I guess the one thing I'm wondering about on somebody's wish list is
requesting interfaces for commercial devices.
My thought is that the vendor of the commercial system should pay to have a
developer or company, write those interfaces.
Doing it for free, makes the vendor rich, by making his
This is incorrect. Over 50 VA sites have installed GUI Mail, along with
sites outside of the VA. It runs on Forum the National Vista e-mail server.
GUI Mail is a Delphi-based front end to the underlying Vista Mail system. It
allows attachments, and the newest version also addresses the GAB if you
Yes, Exchange is highly utilized in VA. There is no question about that.
But, how many things does Exchange do that VistA Mail can't do, especially
when enhanced with GUI Mail or other GUI clients?
This is even taking into consideration that VistA mail has been in deep
maintenance mode for a
Samuel, there are several ways to assign a patient to a ward and a bed, but
the patient must be admitted first so use the Admit a Patient option in
VistA.
In that option you will be prompted for a ward and a bed.
You can later Transfer him/her to another ward and bed if you wish.
All of these
Samuel, My advice is to go to the Vista Documentation Library at this URL.
http://www.va.gov/vdl/Clinical.asp?appID=55
And read the Supervisor ADT Menu document and then the Bed Control Menu
document.
I think you will find your answers there. Along with the answers to some
questions you haven't
And if you can't see the attachment
it's also at this website
http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/
under "What's New".
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sowinski, Richard J.
Sent: Wednesday, September 14,
2005 9:21 AM
To:
Usha, did you do all your FTP'ing in
ascii mode?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Usha
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005
8:01 AM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Hardhats-members]
Install MPI AUSTIN
Hi
We are doing some
Also, with all of this Open Source development that is supposedly going to
be taking place (and I believe some will because VistA and VOE will garner
some percentage of the marketplace), who will be handing out namespaces and
number spaces, etc, so all of this pent-up creativity plays well
How could someone contribute to VOE (besides being an alpha tester), unless
they work for DAOU? Am I missing something?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin
Toppenberg
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 3:08 PM
To:
Yes, I really don't get caught up in the semantics too much. But you're
right these are more features that I would have liked to have seen
available in M development environments.
I'm guessing there just was not enough competition in the M marketplace to
truly force these issues.
Some vendor(s)
They must have removed the first article on Trademark Arrogance from their
website. It's not there now.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Maury
Pepper
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 2:41 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject:
Mark,
Mark, I'm guessing you're dealing with a non-veteran population.
I don't have time to test using the Fileman Import function, but I was able
to get a record into the patient file programmatically by filling in the
fields Mr. Holloway calls out in his message, as I expected I could.
NAME:
http://news.com.com/Longhorns+new+name+Windows+Vista/2100-1016_3-5799734.html?tag=sas.email
Could have been, I turned 50 this year, so forgive me if I named the wrong
person as the winner.
But getting back to the point, it seems odd to some of us that Microsoft
would choose this name, and at this time.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
A lunchtime search of US copyright code, turned this up. As I read it, the
gov't cannot originate a copyright for its own work, but if someone wants to
transfer to the gov't a copyright they already own, they can, and then the
gov't owns it. But now I'm thinking you need to trademark a name, and
OK, I think I've conceded that.
However, it was Al Gore who invented the internet, correct?
At least I remember the important stuff.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mobley,
Sharon C.
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 12:20 PM
To:
I think there are some +'s and -'s to both.
Obviously, the roll and scroll can run on dumb terminals. Therefore
eliminating the need for PC's and PC operating systems that are vulnerable
to attack. Probably a +, especially in third world implementations, where
cost, and sophisticated network
.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
Bhaskar, KSSent: Sunday, June 19, 2005 10:05 PMTo:
hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.netSubject: [Hardhats-members]
GUIMail 2.2.1 available
Thanks to Richard Sowinski, GUIMail 2.2.1 is available
] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==
Richard Sowinski wrote:
The reason I have asked people on this list if they have VistaWeb up and
running, is because I suspect
they underestimate the infrastructure required under the hood, to make
it,
or RDV run.
I also suspect, some have misconstrued what VistaWeb is. I think
Actually it looks like the file that holds the data about where each
patient has been seen, is file 391.91, the Treating Facility
file.
Now
that I know which RPC you used, it waspretty easy to figure that out.
-
Rich
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We
have just completed a new version of the GUI Mail Client which contains some
nice enhancements.
It is
called version 2.2 andit is not up on Hardhats yet.
GUI
Mail is a class III product, developed here at the Indianapolis VA Medical
Center, which is why you don't see it at
ftp.va.gov
I guess I'd like to hear a possible scenario where some organization like VA
would be calling
World Vista for support, when they have an army of their own in-house
support people.
I'm just trying to understand what future scenario you see Greg, that I
can't visualize, yet.
-Original
I'm not a lawyer either, but I think what you're saying is that it might be
illegal for any current federal employee to moonlight for any organization
that has any contract with the federal gov't.
If this is true, I'm betting that particular law, is violated frequently.
The way I would see
Joseph,
I don't think you are splitting hairs when you raise the question about
VueCentric. I know the developers of VueCentric monitor this list, chime
in on rare occasions, and would be capable of answering your question, if
they choose to.
But, I can also tell you that if I were the
Kevin, I am not aware of any hard feelings between IHS and VA.
Your first annonymous poster seemed to want to create some, though. IMO
anyone who wants to post annonymously, to this board, is expecting to create
controversy, but wants to avoid responsibilty for what they say. Kind of
like
I agree with Richard on this. Changing the DD definition of a commonly used
field like
SSN, would most likely have some unwanted, and unintended side-effects.
Code that references SSN, would not always be in the Data Dictionary. It
would also be in routines, sometimes obscured by indirection.
Nancy,
No, Vista Web is an alternative to Remote Data Views. Its advantage over
RDV's it that it is faater and more efficient. Not as much watching the
hourglass.
It is a view only application.
I think what you are referring to is a new version of CPRS that will be
coming
out later this year.
The
Remote Procedure File #8994
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 1:25
PMTo: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.netSubject:
[Hardhats-members] RPC calls mapping to OpenVista
Jim, the stovepipes are the underlying clinical (and some clinical/administrative) packages, such as Lab, Pharmacy, V-files, PCE, TIU, Bed Control, PTF, Radiology, etc.Many of these packages were developed years ago (I believe initially atdifferentmedical centers, and then at different Field
A rational plan A might have been to re-engineer Vista such that the
clinical packages were lighter, more like front-ends to an underlying
clinical repository, which stored all the results and data for lab tests,
procedures, prescriptions, problem lists, diagnoses, etc. in a standardized,
easily
www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2005/0501.longman.html
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start
Kevin,
You are battling an age-old predjudice against M. It seems M was considered
old technology (by the un-informed), before it was old ! I think alot of
the predjudice goes back to the poorly chosen (IMO) name of MUMPS, for the
language.
Had it has been named Laser or maybe just M in the
Medicine (in some ways) is a more complicated domain.
Launching a spacecraft is simply a matter of kinematics, dynamics, and some
fairly determistic equations that never change.
But, we get your point.
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Dal Molin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
33 matches
Mail list logo
