I just got around to searching for Paint.NET
I can't find it.
Can you post a URL?
Thanks
Kevin
--- David Sommers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find that the most flexible license is one that
doesn't exist - such
as Public Domain.
One of my favorite little programs is a Photoshop
like
VistA is Public Domain, not Open Source, always has been, always (at least
should) will be.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ignacio
Valdes
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 4:38 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject:
I can understand how new modules (a.k.a packages) built on top of VistA
infrastructure could be licensed under GPL, but I cannot believe that
software obtained via FOIA could simply declared to be open source.
Gregory Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Apr 24, 2005, at 1:44 PM, Roy Gaber
Exactly, it couldn't, but the install routines, the additional modules,
the documentation (non-VA) all of that could.
My little attempt at getting greek to work even though it isn't much
more than a hack and a hack explained to me by others could.
And that could aid other Greek or foreign
I should add that we're discussing OpenVistA of course and not FOIA
VistA or any other name to replace OpenVistA as pointed out by Nancy.
Molly
Dr Molly Cheah wrote:
Ignacio,
The games, nay, the discussions started seriously in two other mailing
lists last year, Vista-vendors and
It's the process not the license that really mattersPublic Domain
could work just as well as an open source license in providing a
collaborative medium if improvements are made available to others via
public domainbut IMHO it is naive to expect this to happen given the
past 15+ years
You are absolutely correct, I stand corrected.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Self
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 8:44 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] VistA licensing.
I don't understand
I think there is a distinction being made between varieties of open source. I
don't think anyone is trying to say that public domain isn't open source.
On Sunday 24 April 2005 08:43 pm, Jim Self wrote:
I don't understand why suddenly there is so much repetition on this list of
the mistaken
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nancy
Anthracite
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 9:07 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] VistA licensing.
I think there is a distinction being made between varieties of open
source. I
don't think anyone
