Re: [Hardhats-members] GTM prompt weirdness with FreeBSD

2006-10-10 Thread K.S. Bhaskar
If GT.M works at all on OS X, I would expect it the compiler to run unchanged. This is because while GT.M generates object files in a standard format, it uses its own dynamic loader. In Ismet's case, I suspect that the 1h is coming from some mismatch having to do with terminal characteristics

Re: [Hardhats-members] GTM prompt weirdness with FreeBSD

2006-10-10 Thread Greg Woodhouse
--- K.S. Bhaskar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If GT.M works at all on OS X, I would expect it the compiler to run unchanged. This is because while GT.M generates object files in a standard format, it uses its own dynamic loader. Maybe. Obviously, habing your own linker makes a big

Re: [Hardhats-members] GTM prompt weirdness with FreeBSD

2006-10-10 Thread Ismet Kursunoglu
In Ismet's case, I suspect that the 1h is coming from some mismatch having to do with terminal characteristics on the server side (e.g., libncurses). I wonder if something like stty sane before going into GT.M might make a difference. I tried that but you still see the GTM1h displayed

Re: [Hardhats-members] GTM prompt weirdness with FreeBSD

2006-10-09 Thread Norman Dodd
We have been using Putty for our remote sites with no problems -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ismet Kursunoglu Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 9:32 AM To: Hardhats Subject: [Hardhats-members] GTM prompt weirdness with FreeBSD I see a '1h'

Re: [Hardhats-members] GTM prompt weirdness with FreeBSD

2006-10-09 Thread Kevin Toppenberg
Could that be part of an escape code sending a terminal control sequence? Have you tried putty? Does it do the same thing? Can you tell us more about the linux compatibility layer for FreeBSD? I wonder how that would work with OS X? Kevin On 10/9/06, Ismet Kursunoglu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [Hardhats-members] GTM prompt weirdness with FreeBSD

2006-10-09 Thread Ismet Kursunoglu
Could that be part of an escape code sending a terminal control sequence? Have you tried putty? Does it do the same thing? If it is related to the terminal then why the different behavior with C-VT100 series of terminal emulation from Debian to FreeBSD? My understanding that putty is a