Nancy,
I'm still not completely following you here. I think
you are saying that you want to set up one server that
everyone could connect to, so we could colaborate.
The only need for port forwarding would be if the
server is behind a firewall. But one could also make
the server secure (i.e.
Yes, I have done that - put the server out in the DMZ and had someone connect
CPRS to it, but I did not consider what I did to be secure. However, with
port forwarding (tunneling), and private key public key authentication, I
think it could be made secure. I think what you have done to CPRS
Sorry this was late getting to the list. It was posted from an address
not in the mailing list, so it required me to approve it.
Beron, Claudine wrote:
VistA Community Call 021105
VistA Community Call
1-866-639-4718 Access 9185610
February 11, 2005
Attendees:
Kevin, Rusty, et al --
Although VistA on GT.M on Linux on CoLinux on Windows is likely to be a
perfectly good demonstration environment, it is not supported for
production or even safe for situations where you need to ensure data
integrity (like production). Please do not use it in production.
On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 12:38 -0500, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
[KSB] ...snip...
Last but not least, buy support contracts - from your hardware
vendor, for your operating system (you can purchase support for
all major Linux distributions - Crawford Rainwater may want to
As always, Bhaskar's advice seems well thought out, knowledgeable, and solid.
I think that we in VMTH are pretty closely in alignment with it. I am no longer
directly
involved in the setup of our production systems, so I may have missed some
details. I
think we are still using ext3 file systems
OK, now I think I am following you. I wasn't thinking
of port forwarding as tunneling. Sorry. I think you
would have to do that, as someone wrote that the RPC
broker communications are in clear-text. But right
now I don't know how to do port forwarding with SSH.
Can PuTTY do this?
Kevin
Yes, Putty can do it.
On Saturday 12 February 2005 09:47 pm, Kevin Toppenberg wrote:
OK, now I think I am following you. I wasn't thinking
of port forwarding as tunneling. Sorry. I think you
would have to do that, as someone wrote that the RPC
broker communications are in clear-text.
