Hi All,
As i was trying to add a new consult from CPRS and was
unsuccesful as i cannot select a Service/Speciality
for the Consult. The only selectable
Service/Speciality is ---All Services and when i
click on the 'Accept Order' button
the message,
'The order cannot be saved for the following
I do not know if the feature changed about S DUZ(0)=^. I do not remember
ever being able to edit a field that was write protected with the ^. But
I have not tried S DUZ(0)=^ in years.
Uneditable and write protection using ^ are two different things with
similarities. An uneditable field is
Problem solved, thx!
Nick
--- Nick James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
As i was trying to add a new consult from CPRS and
was
unsuccesful as i cannot select a Service/Speciality
for the Consult. The only selectable
Service/Speciality is ---All Services and when i
click on the 'Accept
Problem solved, thx!
Nick
--- Nick James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When i try to order a procedure in CPRS, i do not
have
any procedures in the 'procedure' drop down list and
the 'Service to perform this proedure' drop down
list.
How can i populate this list?
Nick
No fair, Nick, You need to tell us how you solved it! Think of the archives
of this mailing list as a FAQ for those who follow us on these configuration
adventures - like me, for instance.
More of us need to document what we do on these adventures as well. We should
be putting together a
My e-mail address at work is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fidelity National
Financial purchased Sanchez Computer Associates last year, but the
infrastructure integration is a large project, still underway. Since I
was migrated to the Fidelity mail server yesterday, there is an e-mail
address change. For a
A web page offering the tributes many have given for Fil (those in and
outside the VA) has been posted to Hardhats. It is linked to the
History page.
http://www.hardhats.org/history/HSTmain.html
Greg Kreis wrote:
We have heard that funeral services are being held in the Phillipines,
but that
I'm having a hard time with my transcription upload
system. At first the KERMIT upload system built into
the TIU system would work after 1-4 tries. But today
it's absolutely refusing to upload a text file.
So I have tried to use the other built-in system: HFS.
This is a screen log of what I
Greg, I do not know if you are the sole architect of the Hardhats web site or
not, but whoever is, in single or multiple, that site is a great site. It is
jammed full of information and things that are important to the Hardhats and
friends, and I think it is a great service to the VistA
I would appreciate more detailed discussion on this point if possible. It would
seem from
what you write that such fields cannot be properly edited from the Fileman DBS
API. If so,
that would seem to present a severe impediment to any attempts to put a more
modern
general database driven user
It seems to me that VistA is not just a database, with
secondarily important routines to adjust that data.
Instead, it seems that it is both. Thus this locked
database field is not supposed to be altered except
through the proper channels (the program code.)
So it may well be problematic trying
Since this seems to be a new issue for Kevin and he has been crawling around
in VistA for a while now, is this sort of field not rare as hen's teeth?
I would think that some internal policy in the VA might be responsible for
locking up this field. For instance, perhaps they did not want
In view of recent discussion on the list on production
issues, instead of a planned 1-day workshop on GT.M itself in conjunction with
the Boston VistA Community Meeting, I wonder if I should put together a 1-day
(no charge) workshop to cover topics associated with putting VistA into
My e-mail address at work is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fidelity National
Financial purchased Sanchez Computer Associates last year, but the
infrastructure integration is a large project, still underway. Since I
was migrated to the Fidelity mail server yesterday, there is an e-mail
address change. For a
Title: RE: [Hardhats-members] GTM database replication at remote site
With GT.M logical dual site operation, there is always a single primary on which updates occur. A couple of other ways to accomplish what you want come to mind:
The BCMA backup system developed for the VA so that there is
Nancy,
I thought i would write how i solved it in may mail,
but was wondering if anyone would find it useful!
Sorry.
This mailing list has been a source of great help and
support, i think it is something that i would find my
privelege to contribute to, if i can with the little i
know!!!
As far
HiYesterday I just tried to see how a patient
can be made SENSITIVE. I created an entry in the DG SECURITY LOG file for that
patient. And it is working fine.But my system has started behaving very
strangely. Following are some of the problems I faced: 1) I cannot add a new
entry into the
Title: RE: [Hardhats-members] GTM database replication at remote site
Bhaskar;
You are correct, BCMA Backup is a good
start. It is a full implementation of VistA. It is kept up to date
with a stream of HL7 messaging from the server. Each of the BCMA backup
machines only have to precess
Well, its 1am, and I'm up way too late...
I decided that I entirely didn't like the way the HFS
upload was being done in this function, so I have
rewritten it. It now uses $$FTG^%ZISH to load the HFS
file, rather than opening an IO channel through a
device, and then reading the file in line by
19 matches
Mail list logo
