Uploaded information on configuring Surgery in VistA to the wiki at the link
below:
http://openforum.worldvista.org/~forum/index.php?title=Configuration_of_Surgery
Will appreciate feedback and any correction /improvements.
Thank you
Anna
Edgeware Technologies
New Delhi
Very nice. I don't need this right now, but it appears very well done. Thanks!
Kevin
On 6/20/06, Anna Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uploaded information on configuring Surgery in VistA to the wiki at the link
below:
How can I use kids to export the data for 1 record in a file
of 5? There is no need to export the DD. The record is not an option or
function.
___
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
--- Hay, James (DHS-CMS) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I use kids to export the data for 1 record in a file of 5?
There
is no need to export the DD. The record is not an option or function.
You can use a screen to select records to be exported.
===
Gregory Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is this on the second screen in Kids? If so, aren't I stuck with aa full
or partial DD export?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Greg Woodhouse
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 9:52 AM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re:
--- Hay, James (DHS-CMS) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this on the second screen in Kids? If so, aren't I stuck with aa
full
or partial DD export?
I'm afraid I don't really have time to look into this right now. Is the
problem not being able to export a single record, or is it that you are
Using the KIDS, the best that you can do is export a partial DD. Select a field to be updated that would do no harm to the target system. Then you can use the data screen on the second page to export the entries that you wish. When many have to do this they normally select the .01 field of the
I dont think that's correct. I think once you tell KIDS that you want to
export data, it forces you to a full DD export.
At 03:11 PM 6/20/2006, Steven wrote:
Using the KIDS, the best that you can do is export a partial DD. Select a
field to be updated that would do no harm to the target
I told kids not to update the DD, and set the DD update screen to I 0. I
hope this is all.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 12:56 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members]
--- Hay, James (DHS-CMS) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I told kids not to update the DD, and set the DD update screen to I
0. I
hope this is all.
If that works, I think it probably qualifies as a bug. The intent of
the DD screen is to aloow developers to create patches updating the DD
for
http://govhealthit.com/article94945-06-19-06-Webnewsletter=yes
--
Nancy Anthracite
___
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
From i Health Beat
http://www.ihealthbeat.org/index.cfm?Action=dspItemitemID=122546
--
Nancy Anthracite
___
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
--- Nancy Anthracite [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From i Health Beat
http://www.ihealthbeat.org/index.cfm?Action=dspItemitemID=122546
--
Nancy Anthracite
That kind of gives new meaning to the phrasse financial bill of
health, doesn't it?
===
Gregory Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Judge a
The VA needs to replace VistA because VHA needs a system that users can
easily search instead of sifting through VistA's free text, Kolodner said.
Okay.
At 04:27 PM 6/20/2006, Nancy wrote:
http://govhealthit.com/article94945-06-19-06-Webnewsletter=yes
--- Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The VA needs to replace VistA because VHA needs a system that users
can
easily search instead of sifting through VistA's free text, Kolodner
said.
Okay.
is that really so strange a thing to say? After all, progress notes are
just
What's interesting about all this is that searches through unstructured
text are increasingly common. That's what Google is all about. That's
what Google appliances do inside corporate Intranets. That's what
beagle does on file systems. Presumably, it would be a minimal amount
of extra
--- K.S. Bhaskar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's interesting about all this is that searches through
unstructured
text are increasingly common. That's what Google is all about.
That's
what Google appliances do inside corporate Intranets. That's what
beagle does on file systems.
Gregory wrote:
--- Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The VA needs to replace VistA because VHA needs a system that users can
easily search instead of sifting through VistA's free text, Kolodner said.
Okay.
is that really so strange a thing to say?
Yes, it strikes me that way also. I
This is also one of the historical strengths of VMACS and it is something that
I could
help bring to VistA with M2Web.
Bhaskar wrote:
What's interesting about all this is that searches through unstructured
text are increasingly common. That's what Google is all about. That's
what Google
Here's a thought: if we put the health information in the hands of
patients, they would likely store it in Google, which would increase
accessibility for all :-\ Think MySpace...
Kevin
On 6/20/06, Nancy Anthracite [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From i Health Beat
This was the strength of the Hypertext system I built around VistA years
ago. We had an entity file which helped to manage the documents and the
entities that they were attached to. My basic model was used to build the
library system of Belgium. I built the hypertext system for the US Public
21 matches
Mail list logo
