Re: [Hardhats-members] Steer future direction of VivA packages

2005-02-11 Thread Kevin Toppenberg
Bhaskar, When I wrote asking about CoLinux a month or so ago, you cautioned against using CoLinux in a production environment because it wasn't mature enough, and for other reasons. Are these still true? If the WorldVistA community demo's an all-Windows XP package, will this encourage people to

Re: [Hardhats-members] Steer future direction of VivA packages

2005-02-11 Thread TMaynard
100 points for Colinux I think there is value in offering Vista and GTM prepared for Windows/Colinux for reasons already mentioned by Nancy and if according to John it is easier to employ other Linux apps with access to legacy info on mounted windows partitions. This is the kind of

Re: [Hardhats-members] Steer future direction of VivA packages

2005-02-10 Thread Nancy Anthracite
I assume this CoLinux virtual machine can have configuration work done on it just as a VMWare virtual machine, correct? If so, my 100 points go straight to that right now and we should endeavor, as a group, to work on configuring a copy of VistA for you to stick on there and warm up for

Re: [Hardhats-members] Steer future direction of VivA packages

2005-02-10 Thread John Leo Zimmer
there. :-) Healthcare, a human right. -- Original Message --- From: K.S. Bhaskar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:01:46 -0500 Subject: [Hardhats-members] Steer future direction of VivA packages (while I reserve the right to do what I darn well