Hey,
Is it just me, or do vowels break shaping in Arabic? If so, what should
be done to fix it? I can't think of a way of solving it, maybe only
removing the vowels, shaping without them and then adding previously
shaped glyphs, and then vowels and then the glyphs again and reshaping,
but that's
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 01:28:38PM +0200, Tom Hacohen wrote:
Hey,
Is it just me, or do vowels break shaping in Arabic?
It shouldn't, either the font is broken or you are not doing it right.
Regards,
Khaled
--
Khaled Hosny
Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team
Free font
On 10/27/10 07:28, Tom Hacohen wrote:
Hey,
Is it just me, or do vowels break shaping in Arabic?
Pango has code to work around Arabic fonts that have no GDEF table, and no
GPOS table. I've had planned to implement that in HarfBuzz but been putting
it off for a while. I'll go ahead and do
Maybe you can attach a screenshot at least?
On 10/27/10 09:19, Tom Hacohen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 14:26 +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 01:28:38PM +0200, Tom Hacohen wrote:
Hey,
Is it just me, or do vowels break shaping in Arabic?
It shouldn't, either the font is
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 09:48 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Maybe you can attach a screenshot at least?
I just get isolated forms of all of them, anyhow, screenshot attached.
But please also look at the bottom of the previous message where I
described a SEGFAULT I was getting and also what I
On 10/27/10 09:58, Tom Hacohen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 09:48 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Maybe you can attach a screenshot at least?
I just get isolated forms of all of them, anyhow, screenshot attached.
I fixed that bug and pushed out this morning. Please check with master.
But
On 10/27/10 09:19, Tom Hacohen wrote:
because c-buffer-info[i].gproperty == 65535
So I think there's still an issue.
Fixed that too. Pushed out.
behdad
___
HarfBuzz mailing list
HarfBuzz@lists.freedesktop.org
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 10:41 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On 10/27/10 09:19, Tom Hacohen wrote:
because c-buffer-info[i].gproperty == 65535
So I think there's still an issue.
Fixed that too. Pushed out.
Cool to know my assumptions were correct.
Thank you very much, works like a charm.