Enrico,
Did Tim's comment help? Did this resolve it?
Have you had any other porting issues in either
compilation or configuration? I would like for us to
keep up with these sorts of issues because it would
be great if we could support MSVC as one of the
development _and_ target type
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Nov 1, 2005, at 9:05 PM, Robin Garner wrote:
Actually my colleagues at ANU and I were remarking last week that
all the recent discussion on the Harmony list (configure scripts,
packed structs etc etc) were close to being proof that Java was the
easier way to
Hi you two,
I tried a similar thing (using Visual Studio 2005 Professional). The
empty structs are still an error in that compiler version (What do you
need empyt structs for anyway? Allocation a zero byte memory region
doesn't make much sense to me).
But i also run into problems with pthread.h
C++ allows empty struct or class (gcc 4.0 supports empty struct even in
C). Empty struct/class can be used as a placeholder for future
development.
-Original Message-
From: Sebastian Hartte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 1:23 AM
To:
Enrico Migliore wrote:
Enrico,
Did Tim's comment help? Did this resolve it?
Have you had any other porting issues in either
compilation or configuration? I would like for us to
keep up with these sorts of issues because it would
be great if we could support MSVC as one of the
That seems to be a reasonable explanation. And I don't see
any problem if it's changed to look more like C. ;-)
bye,
Sebastian
Mika Miettinen wrote:
Enrico Migliore wrote:
Right now I got some problems which I'm planning to solve during the
weekend,
here are two examples:
Enrico Migliore wrote:
Sebastian Hartte wrote:
Hi you two,
I tried a similar thing (using Visual Studio 2005 Professional). The
empty structs are still an error in that compiler version (What do you
need empyt structs for anyway? Allocation a zero byte memory region
doesn't make much
Sebastian Hartte wrote:
Hi you two,
I tried a similar thing (using Visual Studio 2005 Professional). The
empty structs are still an error in that compiler version (What do you
need empyt structs for anyway? Allocation a zero byte memory region
doesn't make much sense to me).
But i also run
On Nov 4, 2005, at 3:20 AM, Robin Garner wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Nov 1, 2005, at 9:05 PM, Robin Garner wrote:
Actually my colleagues at ANU and I were remarking last week
that all the recent discussion on the Harmony list (configure
scripts, packed structs etc etc) were
Congratulations!!!
Grettings from Ecuador.
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Nov 4, 2005, at 5:07 AM, Tim Ellison wrote:
Enrico Migliore wrote:
I'm not much familiar with InstallShield scripts and honestly I'd
prefer
to dedicate
my spare time to work on the source code side (C is my daily bread).
FWIW I spent literally a couple
--- Enrico Migliore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For a win32 pthread implementation, try this:
http://sources.redhat.com/pthreads-win32/
There are two libraries I downloaded this one:
pthreadVC2.lib
Shouldn't more care to be taken RE pointing people to
LGPL resources on this list as the
--- Enrico Migliore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For a win32 pthread implementation, try this:
http://sources.redhat.com/pthreads-win32/
There are two libraries I downloaded this one:
pthreadVC2.lib
Shouldn't more care to be taken RE pointing people to
LGPL resources on this list as
My favorite subject...
We have to address this. We started a while ago and it didn't go
well, but we now have two VMs to work with, bootVM and jcheVM, and we
need to get going here in a serious way. We're about to finish up
the legal framework with the bulk contributuion rules, and as
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
We have to address this. We started a while ago and it didn't go well,
but we now have two VMs to work with, bootVM and jcheVM, and we need to
get going here in a serious way. We're about to finish up the legal
framework with the bulk contributuion rules, and as
Matt == Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't understand this (sorry if I wasn't paying attention
earlier). If extend means defining public API's in those
packages, then Classpath doesn't purport to do that. The
java.lang.VMClass, etc. stuff are all internal API's not meant for
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Nov 4, 2005 10:24 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: VM/Class Library Interface (or Storming the Gates! Take 3!)
My favorite subject...
... snip...
1) I didn't look at how jcheVM does it -
Seems like the difference is that once the little bootstrap piece is
done you wouldn't need to recompile it every time... heck, you might
not ever have to if you could just download a little binary for your
platform.
Craig
On Nov 4, 2005, at 4:21 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Nov 4,
Thanks for pointing that out Matt. It is worth noting that many of us
are here specifically due to the terms of the ASL, and of course the
project could not exit the incubator with dependencies upon
ASL-incompatible code. [1]
Regards,
Tim
[1]
Tom Tromey wrote:
Matt == Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't understand this (sorry if I wasn't paying attention
earlier). If extend means defining public API's in those
packages, then Classpath doesn't purport to do that. The
java.lang.VMClass, etc. stuff are all internal API's
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Probably the _first_ thing that will need to be tested will be the built-in
implementations
of the java.lang classes Object, Class, String, and Thread. They are partly
done, but
will need to be tested and any remaining holes filled in. (See also comments
Rodrigo Kumpera wrote:
I cannot see how adding package private classes can possibly be
classified as 'extend the defined namespaces'. This makes perfect
sense and allow implementation classes easier access the guts of spec
classes (eg, org.apache.harmony.ClassLoaderStuff will have some hard
Tim Ellison wrote:
Matt Wasn't one of the issues here the theoretical What
Matt happens when Sun defines a public VMClass class in
Matt java.lang?
There's no bad (i.e., security violating) situation that can arise
from this. It is no different from Sun adding any other class that is
not yet
23 matches
Mail list logo
