Re: JCHEVM builds and runs

2005-11-15 Thread Enrico Migliore
Archie Cobbs wrote: For anyone who wants to play with the JCHEVM contribution, the code in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/harmony/enhanced/trunk/sandbox/contribs/jchevm/jchevm should now be buildable and runnable (on x86 machines only). The file APACHE.README contains some

Re: GNU Classpath hacker room at FOSDEM 2006

2005-11-15 Thread David Tanzer
I'll try to come too. David. On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 22:50 -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: I'll definitely be there - thanks for the note, Mark. Will you let us in the GNU Classpath hacker room though? :) geir On Nov 14, 2005, at 11:33 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote: Hi all, Like the

Re: Code contribution to harmony

2005-11-15 Thread Andrey Chernyshev
Hello, First of all, good job with this class libraries contribution! Sorry for being late, but I have one question related to build. I noticed that make is used to build native sources. Did you try using ant cpptask? If yes, what kind of issues did you face that influenced the choice in favor

Re: VM/Class Library Interface (or Storming the Gates! Take 3!)

2005-11-15 Thread Tim Ellison
Mark Wielaard wrote: Right. It might be instructive to participate in the discussion started this week about the newly proposed network VM interface classes suggested by Ingo and Roman on the classpath-patches mailinglist. http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath-patches (Subject RFC:

Re: Code contribution to harmony

2005-11-15 Thread Tim Ellison
Andrey Chernyshev wrote: Hello, First of all, good job with this class libraries contribution! Thanks Andrey (on behalf of a wide group of people who worked hard to make it happen). Sorry for being late, but I have one question related to build. I noticed that make is used to build native

Re: [legal] Proposed changes for the Bulk Contributor Questionnaire

2005-11-15 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On Nov 15, 2005, at 6:53 AM, Tim Ellison wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: I'm sorry, but I don't understand the issue here. I'm proposing that a) We suggest to people that are about to contribute to us to do some careful inspection before they do that. The assumption here is that people

Re: [legal] Proposed changes for the Bulk Contributor Questionnaire

2005-11-15 Thread Zoe Slattery
Zoƫ Slattery IBM Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 15/11/2005 11:53:44: Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: I'm sorry, but I don't understand the issue here. I'm proposing that a) We suggest to people that are about to contribute to us to do some careful inspection before they do that.

Re: JCHEVM builds and runs

2005-11-15 Thread Archie Cobbs
Enrico Migliore wrote: For anyone who wants to play with the JCHEVM contribution, the code in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/harmony/enhanced/trunk/sandbox/contribs/jchevm/jchevm should now be buildable and runnable (on x86 machines only). The file APACHE.README contains some

Re: [legal] Proposed changes for the Bulk Contributor Questionnaire

2005-11-15 Thread Dalibor Topic
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: On Nov 14, 2005, at 3:18 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote: On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 09:57:48AM -0500, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Leo Simons wrote: Rant below. Decided not to tone it down. Leo++ +1 from me, too. sounds like an excellent way to shoot oneself to

Re: [legal] Proposed changes for the Bulk Contributor Questionnaire

2005-11-15 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On Nov 15, 2005, at 4:28 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: On Nov 14, 2005, at 3:18 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote: On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 09:57:48AM -0500, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Leo Simons wrote: Rant below. Decided not to tone it down. Leo++ +1 from me, too.

Notice - we are having rare but intermittent mail problems.

2005-11-15 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
It appears that we are having very rare mail problems. If you see anything strange, like a mail not making it to you (and then you see responses), please let us know. geir -- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[legal] Take II (Re: [legal] Proposed changes for the Bulk Contributor Questionnaire)

2005-11-15 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
Ok - we gotten some good feedback on this. I'd like to emphasize that these changes really are for what I hope are corner cases, because any contribution for which the contributor has all the ACQs (like the 3 we have already), these new questions aren't asked. The following is the same

Re: [legal] Proposed changes for the Bulk Contributor Questionnaire

2005-11-15 Thread Leo Simons
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 01:51:36AM -0800, Leo Simons wrote: Rant below. Decided not to tone it down. Oh that's a nice examplary attitude Leo. Go and behave just a little will you? I spent some more time thinking about this and soul searching and I talked to Geir for a little bit to get more of

Re: [legal] Proposed changes for the Bulk Contributor Questionnaire

2005-11-15 Thread Leo Simons
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 02:58:55PM +, Zoe Slattery wrote: I like the idea of Apache owning the IP scanning tools. It's easy to write keyword scanners (not much more complicated than grep). I have a few lines of perl that do basic keyword scanning - I'd be happy to put these in JIRA if

Re: [legal] Proposed changes for the Bulk Contributor Questionnaire

2005-11-15 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On Nov 15, 2005, at 8:20 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: You get a list of files. You can go check them. Is how those matches were done significant? Can you tell me the algorithm your head uses? :) Well, we could simply throw a dice, if how the matches were