Re: [os] freebsd

2006-07-14 Thread Mark Hindess
On 13 July 2006 at 19:34, Anton Luht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Some time ago I installed FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE on my home computer and tried to build original Harmony VM donation [1] + corresponding classlib on it. In the end of the efforts I've managed to build it and print something

Re: [classlib] HARMONY-820 (beautifying of java.beans classes)

2006-07-14 Thread Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
Geir Magnusson Jr skrev den 11-07-2006 08:23: return getValue((ObjectNode) nodes.get(oldInstance)); } (added newline after method decl, space after the if, and removed spaces inside getValue()) When using the Eclipse debugger it is hard to see what a given method returns (I may

Re: [classlib] Testing conventions - a proposal

2006-07-14 Thread George Harley
Hi, If annotations were to be used to help us categorise tests in order to simplify the definition of test configurations - what's included and excluded etc - then a core set of annotations would need to be agreed by the project. Consider the possibilities that the TestNG @Test annotation

Re: [DRLVM] build fixes that allow normal single step debug of the Jitrino.JET write barrier patch

2006-07-14 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
Rana Dasgupta wrote: Weldon, Thanks. If jitrino building in debug mode was switched off to not make it crawl, is it an option to not apply these mods, but just leave this thread as a reference for people who need this? The solution I think is to get rid of the build.sh/build.bat wrappers

Re: [DRLVM] build fixes that allow normal single step debug of the Jitrino.JET write barrier patch

2006-07-14 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
Weldon Washburn wrote: All, The following build mods will create a drlvm binary that can be used to debug the Jitrino.JET write barriers. Rather than make everyone suffer through long email chains, Alex and I collaborated offline. When you do that, no one else can participate... try to

Re: [classlib] compatibility nuances

2006-07-14 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
Vladimir Gorr wrote: On 7/14/06, Alexey Varlamov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2006/7/14, Richard Liang [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Magnusson, Geir wrote: -Original Message- From: Alexei Zakharov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 10:19 AM To:

Re: [classlib] compatibility nuances

2006-07-14 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
Alexey Varlamov wrote: 2006/7/14, Richard Liang [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Magnusson, Geir wrote: -Original Message- From: Alexei Zakharov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 10:19 AM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [classlib]

Re: [classlib][testing] excluding the failed tests

2006-07-14 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
Vladimir Ivanov wrote: New page http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Excluded_tests was added to WIKI (refered from http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/ClassLibrary). It would be good if before test investigation one would specify 'in progress, Name' near module name, showing it is under investigation

Re: [DRLVM] build fixes that allow normal single step debug of the Jitrino.JET write barrier patch

2006-07-14 Thread Andrey Chernyshev
On 7/14/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rana Dasgupta wrote: Weldon, Thanks. If jitrino building in debug mode was switched off to not make it crawl, is it an option to not apply these mods, but just leave this thread as a reference for people who need this? The solution I

Re: [DRLVM] build fixes that allow normal single step debug of the Jitrino.JET write barrier patch

2006-07-14 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
Andrey Chernyshev wrote: On 7/14/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rana Dasgupta wrote: Weldon, Thanks. If jitrino building in debug mode was switched off to not make it crawl, is it an option to not apply these mods, but just leave this thread as a reference for

Re: [drlvm] using the harmony launcher

2006-07-14 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
Oliver Deakin wrote: Andrey Chernyshev wrote: (5) What to do with the _org.apache.harmony.vmi.portlib option that launcher is offering to VM? This passes the classlib port library function table to the VM. I think this just makes the classlib port library available to the VM for it to

Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-857) Quick impl for invocation API - make drlvm work with classlib launcher

2006-07-14 Thread Mark Hindess
On 14 July 2006 at 4:04, Andrey Chernyshev (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-857?page=comments#action_1 2421079 ] Andrey Chernyshev commented on HARMONY-857: --- Thanks Mark! I'm looking

RE: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-857) Quick impl for invocation API - make drlvm work with classlib launcher

2006-07-14 Thread Magnusson, Geir
I really think that we should resolve this issue and find a middleground... -- Geir Magnusson Jr SSG/MPD [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 203 665 6437 -Original Message- From: Mark Hindess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 8:52 AM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org

Re: [classlib] compatibility nuances

2006-07-14 Thread Richard Liang
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: Alexey Varlamov wrote: 2006/7/14, Richard Liang [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Magnusson, Geir wrote: -Original Message- From: Alexei Zakharov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 10:19 AM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org; [EMAIL

Re: svn commit: r420823 - in /incubator/harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/depends/libs/build: ./ README.txt fetch-awt-depends.sh

2006-07-14 Thread Alexey Petrenko
I've finally finished building awt with the jpeg and png binaries from the GnuWin32. Everything seems fine. Tests are loading and draw png and jpeg images whithout any problem. But we face 3 problems here: 1. lcms version in GnuWin32 is not compatible with Harmony. 2. png libary from GnuWin32

Re: [classlib][testing] excluding the failed tests

2006-07-14 Thread Richard Liang
Great job. Vladimir ;-) Vladimir Ivanov wrote: New page http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Excluded_tests was added to WIKI (refered from http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/ClassLibrary). It would be good if before test investigation one would specify 'in progress, Name' near module name, showing it

Re: [classlib][testing] excluding the failed tests

2006-07-14 Thread Alexei Zakharov
Yes Vladimir, nice job! I have updated the data for beans module. Since the reason of failures for the most of excluded test is not known yet I just put their names there without any comment why they were excluded. Thanks, 2006/7/14, Richard Liang [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Great job. Vladimir ;-)

Re: [DRLVM] build fixes that allow normal single step debug of the Jitrino.JET write barrier patch

2006-07-14 Thread Matt Benson
--- Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrey Chernyshev wrote: [SNIP] I guess the primary job of these scripts is to setup the classpath correctly. We can get of them under assumption that everyone has a cpptasks (which is needed for native code compilation) and antcontrib

Re: [classlib] compatibility nuances

2006-07-14 Thread Alexei Zakharov
Vladimir wrote: (I believe Alexey used it to test. *Or J9 nevertheless*? IMHO it needs to specify when same discussions start). I have tried both. And both differ from RI. Richard wrote: For getDeclaredMethods(), J9 has the same behavior as RI. Well, there are some nuances nevertheless. I

Re: [classlib] compatibility nuances

2006-07-14 Thread Vladimir Gorr
In this case I'd like to understand what behaviour is correct and what should be made to satisfy the users. I have no any preference. Thanks, Vladimir. On 7/14/06, Alexei Zakharov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Vladimir wrote: (I believe Alexey used it to test. *Or J9 nevertheless*? IMHO it needs

Re: [drlvm] using the harmony launcher

2006-07-14 Thread Andrey Chernyshev
On 7/13/06, Oliver Deakin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrey Chernyshev wrote: With some changes I was able to run the DRLVM with classlib's launcher. Here is what I did (you can see the experimental patch at http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-857): - I have added JNI_CreateJavaVM

Re: [DRLVM] build fixes that allow normal single step debug of the Jitrino.JET write barrier patch

2006-07-14 Thread Weldon Washburn
On 7/14/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Question: Should the above be bundled up as a JIRA patch? I think the goal should be allowing people interested in this mode to simply pass a sensible flag/property, such that for everyone else, there is no change. And no - you're a

RE: [classlib] HARMONY-820 (beautifying of java.beans classes)

2006-07-14 Thread Nathan Beyer
The way to do this in Eclipse is to select the code that you want to see a return value for and invoke the inspect functions. This will cause the code to be execute and the result is displayed in a pop-up, which you can inspect. Although the code executes, it does not move the current line of

Re: [DRLVM] GC heap verification infrastructure

2006-07-14 Thread Egor Pasko
On the 0x1A6 day of Apache Harmony Vera Volynets wrote: * GC heap verification infrastructure *** Hi, I have been working on implementing GC heap verification infrastructure for Stop-The-World GC in DRLVM. This infrastructure is intended be used with any

Re: [classlib] Testing conventions - a proposal

2006-07-14 Thread Andrew Zhang
On 7/14/06, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, If annotations were to be used to help us categorise tests in order to simplify the definition of test configurations - what's included and excluded etc - then a core set of annotations would need to be agreed by the project. Consider the