+1
And I wrote about restrictions to verifier patches.
On 23/07/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All is in order and in SVN for Harmony-856 wrt BCC and ACQ.
Please vote to accept or reject this codebase into the Apache Harmony
class library :
[ ] + 1 Accept
[ ] -1 Reject
Leo Li wrote:
2006/7/24, Jimmy, Jing Lv [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Andrew Zhang wrote:
Hello everybody,
I plan to implement
java.nio.channels.spi.SelectorProvider.inheritedChannel()
method. Currently Harmony simply returns null.
Spec doesn not specify how to detect inheritedChannel clearly,
I agree that we should implement both 3.2 and 4.01 DTDs. Moreover 3.2 is just a
subset of 4.01 and, I believe, it doesn't require much work to support 3.2 too.
--
Alexey A. Ivanov
Intel Middleware Product Division
-Original Message-
From: Alexey Petrenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
2006/7/13, Andrew Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello everybody,
I plan to implement
java.nio.channels.spi.SelectorProvider.inheritedChannel()
method. Currently Harmony simply returns null.
Spec doesn not specify how to detect inheritedChannel clearly, Returns
the
channel inherited from the entity
On 24/07/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that we have a distribution of the VM + classlib in the JRE, we can
start encouraging people to try real applications and tell us what's
wrong. I'm guessing this will be an avalanche of useful information :)
Good idea! Let's just
On 7/19/06, Mikhail Loenko wrote:
A long ago we agreed that providers go into a separate module. But
now I think it's might be not very reasonable.
Hi Mikhail,
Why you think that is not reasonable?
Here is the initial proposal:
Seems no others interest in this;), so I'm going to assign harmony-617
to myself and implement a connection pool if no one objects.
I may need a couple of days to implement and test it, so I plan to add
the class skeleton to o.a.h.luni.net, and enrich them step by step,
until at last I'll
2006/7/22, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
There are not much news to share...
First of all I realized that I did not completely build Yoko. My build
was failed with the test failure. I thought that all the tests are at
the end so all the sources are built. But
If we create separate module for each provider then number of modules is going
to be too big... (e.g. RI has 6 or 7 providers)
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/7/24, Stepan Mishura [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 7/19/06, Mikhail Loenko wrote:
A long ago we agreed that providers go into a separate module. But
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
2006/7/22, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
There are not much news to share...
First of all I realized that I did not completely build Yoko. My build
was failed with the test failure. I thought that all the tests are at
the end so
Hello
Sorry for late replay. It was very nice weekend for me :)
On 7/21/06, Rana Dasgupta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- I could not get the unwind failure that you have mentioned (with
the overflow happening in the first two lines) though I played around
with
the test, but that may depend
2006/7/24, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
2006/7/22, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
There are not much news to share...
First of all I realized that I did not completely build Yoko. My build
was failed with the test failure.
There are several virtual machines in Harmony project and none of them
provides subroutine verification for Java bytecode. I would like to discuss
appropriate methodology of subroutine verification.
In Java bytecode, subroutines represent code in finally construction. The
use of such subroutines
Hi
On 7/22/06, Mikhail Fursov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this must be a JIT heuristics because even a small method can lead
to inlining of whole classlib API :)
Are You think this check should be removed from VM and puted into JIT only?
BR
Pavel Afremov.
Hello, all.
I would like to work on cleaning the insides of Class.h header file.
This header is related to internal representation of java class inside the
VM. Currently it contains all entities for internal class representation:
class itself, constant pool, members (field, method), exceptions
2006/7/24, Pavel Pervov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello, all.
I would like to work on cleaning the insides of Class.h header file.
This header is related to internal representation of java class inside the
VM. Currently it contains all entities for internal class representation:
class itself,
2006/7/21, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've stared at the patch for a bit, and am comfortable enough now (I
didn't doubt you, the patch was very simple, rather I didn't understand
the issue.)
I still am a little worried worried because we didn't care if they were
proper substitutes
Good day,
Are there any licensing limitations for those applications? Someone
can find a bug in an application licensed under GPL, then minimize it
to a test made of a couple of classes from that application and submit
it to JIRA. It's likely that such test can sneak in the test suite.
There's
On 7/24/06, Alexey Petrenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2006/7/24, Pavel Pervov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello, all.
I would like to work on cleaning the insides of Class.h header file.
This header is related to internal representation of java class inside
the
VM. Currently it contains all
Weldon,
I also recently discovered what could be problem with jitrino.JET
compiling OPCODE_LCMP. Jitrino.JET is core dumping. This problem
I'm looking into the issue.
Could you please share the class/method that causes assertion ?
--
Thanks,
Alex
Weldon Washburn wrote:
All,
Hi, Paulex,
On 7/7/06, Paulex Yang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I'm working on the FileChannel completion, and my thought is to
write platform dependent codes for mmap at first(I thought it is easier
to be accepted, so that things can be moved forward), then propose a
mmap related extension
IMO, it is not a big issue. We may create one module for all providers (like
'tools' module) and building 'providers' module will produce a set of
required jars.
Thanks,
Stepan.
On 7/24/06, Mikhail Loenko wrote:
If we create separate module for each provider then number of modules is
going
+1
I think this patches are well classified and very important.
On 7/24/06, Pavel Rebriy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
And I wrote about restrictions to verifier patches.
On 23/07/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All is in order and in SVN for Harmony-856 wrt BCC and ACQ.
In the JSSE provider TwoKeyHashMap is used to store objects in the
session's application layer data (see javax.net.ssl.SSLSession spec).
The name and access control context are used as keys in TwoKeyHashMap
(according the spec. the same named values may not be visible across
different access
No, I think that VM can do this check but use lower border: e.g. 1/100 of
initial.
JIT must do this check more accurate: use knowledge of algorithms it uses.
The requirement to avoid SOE during a compilation can affect any algorithm
in JIT that uses recursion. Jitrino.OPT has a lot of such
Xiao-Feng Li wrote:
Thanks. Those docs are helpful.
Thank,
xiaofeng
That sounds encouraging, thanks :)
On 7/21/06, Morozova, Nadezhda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
I've posted another doc that might be of use to you [1] :-) this is
about plugging in a custom GC implementation.
On 7/23/06, Alex Blewitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This sounds like premature optimisation to me. After all, how many
lookups are being performed in the crypto framework? If it's just a
pairing of (say) provider/hash algorithm, how frequently is it being
used? Do we have any stats that show the
Hi George,
Sorry for the late reply.
It looks like you are using an os.any group for those test methods
(the majority) which may be run anywhere. That's a different approach to
what I have been doing. I have been thinking more along the lines of
avoiding the creation of groups that cover the
On 7/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Weldon Washburn wrote:
All,
Implementations of the abstract classes from:
http://cs.anu.edu.au/~Steve.Blackburn/private/mmtk-20060714.jar :::
src/org/mmtk/vm/*.java have been created.
This is under CPL, right?
Exactly. MMTk is
On 24 Jul 2006 12:17:18 +0700, Egor Pasko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting results! QuickQuestions:
* did you include interface calls in your investigations. Or is it
just invokevirtual that you tried?
I have no idea what was the way of calling a method. The result shows only
the
On 7/21/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Fridlender wrote:
On 7/21/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
While it's not a critical thing, this seems like something we want to
put to bed. Tim tried taking a run at this for one of these
On 7/21/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
I tried to use it. It is OK, but I have some comments on it. First of
all,
let me describe as I see the testing process:
- for developers:
Before the commit of new feature/ fix the developer should run some
+1
I glanced at Harmony-856. It does indeed contain a bunch of small
patches that seem OK to apply.
On 7/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All is in order and in SVN for Harmony-856 wrt BCC and ACQ.
Please vote to accept or reject this codebase into the Apache Harmony
class
Pavel,
Class.h is also used by other modules with by of vm.h public wrappers.
Can you add more class hierarchy analysis (CHA) related methods to the
public interface of Class.h during the refactoring.
The methods I interested in
1) To iterate class hierarchy in two directions: from super to
On 7/21/06, Mark Hindess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was planning to jar up tests from modules just as I have with the test
support classes (in build/test/support.jar) and I'd expect those to
remain in the hdk.
Seems, that it will enough to pack all modules\name\bin\test directories
into
Let me add a couple of words.
The problem: in Harmony unit test suite we need to mark-up somehow and
manage:
- Platform-specific unit tests
- Harmony implementation test vs. API tests
- Broken buggy tests
- Tests failing due to bug in implementation
- [Potentially in future] type of test –
On 7/24/06, Mikhail Fursov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I think that VM can do this check but use lower border: e.g. 1/100 of
initial.
JIT must do this check more accurate: use knowledge of algorithms it uses.
The requirement to avoid SOE during a compilation can affect any algorithm
in JIT
On 7/24/06, Pavel Pervov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, all.
I would like to work on cleaning the insides of Class.h header file.
This header is related to internal representation of java class inside the
VM. Currently it contains all entities for internal class representation:
class itself,
-Original Message-
From: Paulex Yang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 4:17 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Classlib/win.ia32 Build/Test
Ivanov, Alexey A wrote:
Hi all.
BTW, my default locale is Russian
That's
Michail,
If some component external to VM core has direct access to class.h, this
should be eliminated shortly. AFAIU, there are none such components.
Answering your questions:
1) It is possible to traverse class hierarchy downward using available
specialized interfaces. It is also possible to
-Original Message-
From: Paulex Yang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 10:27 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [testing] locale dependent tests
Andrew Zhang wrote:
On 7/19/06, Richard Liang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Weldon,
thank you for catching this.
1) Entities I want to make C++ classes are struct Class and constant pool of
a class.
2) Class members (fields and methods) are already C++ classes.
3) VTables are NOT going to become C++ classes.
The motivation for moving to C++ is encapsulation of access
Hello to all!
Sorry for such a delay in responce, was on vacation and had slow access to
e-mail.
I just would like to summarize our thoughts.
I agree with Tim, that a tool to generate Msg and MsgUtil classes based on
the teamplate may has sence.
I had doubts that these classes are ot be changed
Hi Weldon.
There is a simple test in description of the
*HARMONY-945*https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-945
.
I can add this test in the smoke tests of DRLVM. Is it OK?
Pavel Afremov.
On 7/24/06, Mikhail Fursov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I think that VM can do this check but use lower border: e.g. 1/100 of
initial.
JIT must do this check more accurate: use knowledge of algorithms it uses.
...
I think we can review this issue when the check appears in the JIT.
Pavel
On 7/24/06, Pavel Pervov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michail,
If some component external to VM core has direct access to class.h, this
should be eliminated shortly. AFAIU, there are none such components.
Yes there are no such components, JIT uses 'vm.h' file to access class or
methods
Hi Vladimir,
Cons:
1. More complex algorithms of grouping / selecting tests for execution:
harness (being it Junit, TestNG or my own script) must understand word
mark-up instead of just simple walking directories.
BTW, after brief browsing of the JUnit 4.0 documentation I didn't find
any
Hello,
* As Alex and other have mentioned, just use a simple wrapper object with
correct equals/hashCode.
There can be a single instance of such object - not creation of a new
key before lookup but assigning two keys' values :)
--
Regards,
Anton Luht,
Intel Middleware Products Division
Guys,
don't you think that it is better to add build date to the hdk/jre
archive instead of svn revision? Or add date with svn revision...
I think that how long time ago was this build produced? is a common question.
2006/7/24, Alexey Varlamov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2006/7/21, Geir Magnusson Jr
Hey gang,
I know I've talked about this with a bunch of people (specifically also at the
last apachecon), but I couldn't find it stated anywhere in a public e-mail, so
I figured I'd waste a bit of everyone's time and write an email. I hope its all
obvious stuff anyway.
Harmony has received and
Gregory Shimansky skrev den 22-07-2006 23:57:
classlib but I assure you that all I had installed was Visual Studio
Express
and Platform SDK, not even MASM because it was not available by that time.
Ok, thank you for replying. I have now given up on this, so hopefully
others will get it
Great idea!
I'm trying to run Apache Geronimo (it's a J2EE 1.4 certified application
server, http://geronimo.apache.org) on Harmony VM/classlib. Geronimo
starts (mostly) successfully, but a number of important issues does
exist. It seems that those issues could be good candidates to
App-Oriented
As I understand it, the value added by a broad check like this before the
compile starts may not be very high. At best, it can try to avoid SOE in
native code with a clean failure when it is certain that the stack state
will not permit completion of the compile. So something like 1/100 of the
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
I've asked Sun about this. It would be nice if people could re-use
their root cert store.
What format does IBM and BEA use?
FWIW the IBM Java SDK passes through the Sun format JKS.
Does passes
Pavel Pervov wrote:
On 7/24/06, Alexey Petrenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2006/7/24, Pavel Pervov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
First thing I would like to do is to split the file into a group of
files,
each of which would contain only one entity (and some closely related
entities, if any). This
Weldon Washburn wrote:
On 7/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you up-to-date? We don't have ij.exe anymore...
Actually, I tried several times over the weekend to do a fresh, new
svn checkout. I rolled back to a two week old revision. classlib
and drlvm downloaded OK
Alexey Varlamov wrote:
On windows, I was able to launch Eclipse 3.1.1 sucessfully, edit and run
HWA.
Did just one correction :)
Index: harmony-hdk-r424020\jdk\jre\bin\eclipse.bat
@@ -4,1 +4,1
- set
Leo Simons wrote:
Hey gang,
I know I've talked about this with a bunch of people (specifically also at the
last apachecon), but I couldn't find it stated anywhere in a public e-mail, so
I figured I'd waste a bit of everyone's time and write an email. I hope its
all
obvious stuff anyway.
I think there's an underlying development assumption here. The JIRA issue
would just be a notification of an issue. The investigation and eventual fix
for the issue requires the creation of a regression test case to recreate
the scenario. Then when a fix is applied, this regression test will
If I understood you idea correctly, that would be thread-unsafe
In general before we get rid of that class or decide to keep it, I think
we should work out an approach to performance optimizations.
It's a rare case when perofmance might be significantly improved for free,
a regular price is:
+1
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 1:02 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [vote] acceptance of HARMONY-856 : assorted bug fixed for DRLVM
All is in order and in SVN for Harmony-856 wrt BCC and ACQ.
Ivanov, Alexey A wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Paulex Yang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 10:27 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [testing] locale dependent tests
Andrew Zhang wrote:
On 7/19/06, Richard Liang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Alexei,
The overall idea is to isolate providers' code from 'regular code' and make
it possible to build different 'harmony providers' distributions.
On 7/24/06, Alexei Zakharov wrote:
Hi Stepan,
FYI there are other modules that contain providers, jndi for
example. The JNDI DNS provider
On 25/07/06, Mikhail Loenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In general before we get rid of that class or decide to keep it, I think
we should work out an approach to performance optimizations.
It's a rare case when perofmance might be significantly improved for free,
a regular price is: additional
64 matches
Mail list logo
