It looks like that it is possible to get zero bytes even at the very
end of array. IMHO the order of boundary checks makes sense here.
--
Ivan
On 8/11/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2006/8/11, Jimmy, Jing Lv [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
As discussed in the former thread, I
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
I'll add something on the site today, and put notes in the JRE.
Great, that will be very helpful.
I'll also add language to point win2k users to the IBM JRE, but we won't
publish a snapshot using it - we not only don't have the rights, I think
it's safe to say that
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 03:11:48PM +0100, Tim Ellison wrote:
Dalibor Topic wrote:
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 01:35:34PM +0100, Tim Ellison wrote:
Dalibor Topic wrote:
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:27:42AM +0100, Tim Ellison wrote:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
The problem is Base64 functionality is
Elford, Chris L wrote:
Any _primary_ platform that will be supported by Harmony will probably
need to be put thru a pretty full test protocol on that platform
independent of whether it uses the same binary or a different binary.
Yes - the testing for a given platform is independent of the
Elford, Chris L wrote:
Any _primary_ platform that will be supported by Harmony will probably
need to be put thru a pretty full test protocol on that platform
independent of whether it uses the same binary or a different binary.
Yes - the testing for a given platform is independent of the
Dalibor Topic wrote:
'Harmony - runs fewer apps than the leading brand' is hardly a
compelling tag line.
'Harmony - runs 100% of apps Sun does (sure it's obviously a rubbish claim,
but you should trust us anyway on our other claims)' is not a very
compelling tag line either.
The 100%
Dalibor Topic wrote:
'Harmony - runs 100% of apps Sun does (sure it's obviously a rubbish claim,
but you should trust us anyway on our other claims)' is not a very
compelling tag line either.
But this isn't what we're trying to say, so please don't put words in
our mouth.
The issue is
Dalibor Topic wrote:
So if I can't run the sun.misc.Unsafe remote exploit on
Harmony it is a failure? ;)
You keep referring to this, but IMO this is a mischaracterization of the
exploit. The exploit used a bug in JavaScript that allowed access to the
sun.* package, that was the real problem
While doing some work on the ThreadTest I found a discrepancy with the IBM
VM's Thread.destroy() implementation compared to Sun's RI and DRLVM.
According to the spec [1], the destroy method is supposed to always throw
NoSuchMethodError. The IBM VM doesn't seem to.
Anyway to get this changed
Nathan Beyer wrote:
While doing some work on the ThreadTest I found a discrepancy with the IBM
VM's Thread.destroy() implementation compared to Sun's RI and DRLVM.
According to the spec [1], the destroy method is supposed to always throw
NoSuchMethodError. The IBM VM doesn't seem to.
It
On 12/08/06, Jeroen Frijters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You also keep hammering on CharToByteConverter as an example of bad code
that should trivially be fixed (and it obviously should, if possible,
but it's not always that easy), but there is also code out there that
uses sun.* classes to do
Mark Phippard very kindly took on board my comments, and added a FAQ
to subversion as well as raising an issue for this. A couple of things
are worth noting:
1) I should have used 'svn revert' rather than editing the entries
file by hand. mv new.file new.file.old; svn revert new.file will
I think that Stefano points to the right direction. To be more
specific, Harmony will gain market share if it can run the most
popular java applications, mostly open source (tomcat, resin, jetty,
eclipse, hsql, mckoi, etc), and providing an efficient implementation
of the basic libraries.
To add
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 08:50:42PM +0200, Jeroen Frijters wrote:
Dalibor Topic wrote:
So if I can't run the sun.misc.Unsafe remote exploit on
Harmony it is a failure? ;)
You keep referring to this, but IMO this is a mischaracterization of the
exploit. The exploit used a bug in JavaScript
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 02:27:29PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Dalibor Topic wrote:
'Harmony - runs 100% of apps Sun does (sure it's obviously a rubbish claim,
but you should trust us anyway on our other claims)' is not a very
compelling tag line either.
But this isn't what
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 08:19:33PM -0400, Martin Cordova wrote:
I think that Stefano points to the right direction. To be more
specific, Harmony will gain market share if it can run the most
popular java applications, mostly open source (tomcat, resin, jetty,
eclipse, hsql, mckoi, etc), and
16 matches
Mail list logo
