2006/8/17, Richard Liang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Andrew Zhang wrote:
Hi folks,
I'd like to say something more about jetty integration. We should
reach an
agreement on how to integrate/use jetty in Harmony. There are some
concerns
I can image now:
1. Where to put jetty? support or luni
Hi, Mikhail:
These days i have read a lot of paper about dynamic optimization. I got
the following ideas
to profile the drlvm with PMU:
1. Prefetch Injection Based on Hardware Monitoring and Object Metadata: this
paper is a good
example about how to PMU to dynamic prefetch data with high cache
Iñigo wrote:
C:\Archivos de programa\FreeMind\libjava -Xmx1g -verbose:gc* -jar
freemind.jar
GC v4 M1-39 (2006-03-28)
GC will incrementally slide compact at each GC, using algorithm = 2
Chunks will be swept on allocation
WARNING: final heap size is too large, reduced to 900 Mb
java heap
On the 0x1C8 day of Apache Harmony Weldon Washburn wrote:
Windows uses ia32 segment register fs:14 for fast thread-local storage
access. I think Linux somehow uses the gs segment register.
In general, it is implementation-specific (not older kernels).
Here is a good link for that:
On 8/17/06, Rana Dasgupta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- So we will write the inlinable fastpaths wherever possible in pure
Java, using an annotated calling convention to call the slowpath ( to
support developer freedom :-) ).
- Where the fastpaths cannot be expressible in pure Java,
Hi,
Buffer Size is definitely implementation dependent.
The test should be re done so that it doesn't assume the size of the buffer.
A simple way to structure the test would be :-
- Create a Sub class of BufferedOutputStream.
- Since count and buf have protected access in
Hi folks,
I'd like to investigate tests/api/java/net/DatagramSocketTest.java and
tests/api/java/net/DatagramSocketTest.java in luni module. I have updated
the wiki page(http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Excluded_tests). I'll also plan
to study other excluded tests in luni module when I finish these
On 8/17/06, Richard Liang wrote:
Hello All,
One test case tests.api.java.io.BufferedOutputStreamTest.test_write$BII
fails on RI (passes on Harmony) because the default buf size between RI
and Harmony are different. The default buf size is not specified in the
Java Specification. If we can
On 8/17/06, Andrew Zhang wrote:
Hi folks,
I'd like to say something more about jetty integration. We should reach an
agreement on how to integrate/use jetty in Harmony. There are some
concerns
I can image now:
1. Where to put jetty? support or luni module or somewhere else? It
depends
on
Hi Daniel,
Please resubmit the patch with license granted to ASF
Seems like the patch was generated against original H-935 contribution
and does not take into account later changes. Could you please regenerate the
patch?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/8/17, Mikhail Loenko (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Vijay Yellapragada wrote:
Hi,
Buffer Size is definitely implementation dependent.
The test should be re done so that it doesn't assume the size of the
buffer.
Yes. Just thinking about if there are any user applications depending on
this behavior :-)
A simple way to structure the test
On 8/17/06, Stepan Mishura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/17/06, Andrew Zhang wrote:
Hi folks,
I'd like to say something more about jetty integration. We should reach
an
agreement on how to integrate/use jetty in Harmony. There are some
concerns
I can image now:
1. Where to put jetty?
Hi folks,
After applying Harmony-1024, tests.api.java.net.DatagramSocketTest passes
against Harmony on my machine.
Before enabling it, I'd like to hear more feedbacks from community. Would
you please provide your test result on running DatagramSocketTest against
Harmony?
Thank you very much in
Salikh,
as far as I understood he runs a snapshot...
SY, Alexey
2006/8/17, Salikh Zakirov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Iñigo wrote:
C:\Archivos de programa\FreeMind\libjava -Xmx1g -verbose:gc* -jar
freemind.jar
GC v4 M1-39 (2006-03-28)
GC will incrementally slide compact at each GC, using algorithm
Stepan Mishura wrote:
On 8/17/06, Richard Liang wrote:
Hello All,
One test case tests.api.java.io.BufferedOutputStreamTest.test_write$BII
fails on RI (passes on Harmony) because the default buf size between RI
and Harmony are different. The default buf size is not specified in the
Java
Jimmy,
Ah, we are trying to catch the exact exception name, not its message. I
agree parsing the message is a bad idea, but find an exact exception
name in the output is still stable, am I right?
Yes, it's stable.
In fact, I have no idea to catch an exception in exec, it surely
contains no
Hello,
Please try to apply patch
Index: vm/vmcore/src/verifier/ver_utils.cpp
===
--- vm/vmcore/src/verifier/ver_utils.cpp(revision 432184)
+++ vm/vmcore/src/verifier/ver_utils.cpp(working copy)
@@ -1391,6 +1391,9 @@
Anton, your patch is a dutty hacking.
With and without the patch ActiveMQ crashes as Gregory described.
On 17/08/06, Anton Luht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Please try to apply patch
Index: vm/vmcore/src/verifier/ver_utils.cpp
On 17 Aug 2006 14:01:51 +0700, Egor Pasko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the 0x1C8 day of Apache Harmony Weldon Washburn wrote:
Windows uses ia32 segment register fs:14 for fast thread-local storage
access. I think Linux somehow uses the gs segment register.
In general, it is
All,
I found some GC requirements description in the OPEN spec [1], section
5.3.5 and something inside 6.*. How does those suggestions relate to
what is being discussed?
Do you think we can use that doc as the basis and maybe track major
decisions there? Mail threads tend to drop, and are not
Weldon,
I agree that we need TLS access in vmmagic, but I thought about slightly
different and more primitive implementation.
Writing something like this:
SegmentRegisterFS segFs = new SegmentRegisterFS();
or this:
SegmentRegisterGS segGs = new SegmentRegisterGS();
we add the knowledge of the
Hi all,
I have developed a tool to generate JNI-style headers. This tool is a
replacement for javah tool from the JavaSE 1.5.0. I would like it to
be included in Harmony tools sections.
The archive can be found there:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1217
The archive contains the
On 17 August 2006 at 17:25, Andrew Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
After applying Harmony-1024, tests.api.java.net.DatagramSocketTest passes
against Harmony on my machine.
Before enabling it, I'd like to hear more feedbacks from community. Would
you please provide your test
Right - what I was worried about was that I *thought* that
HARMONY-956 got me to where Gergory is describing, but he's applying
HARMONY-1179.
I'll just stop worrying about this for the snapshot, post it, and
move on w/ 1179 and keep going.
Thanks all for looking into this - I could
Hello,
Now some people in this list are trying to make ActiveMQ run on
Harmony. ActiveMQ is based on MX4J [1] . MX4J 3.0.1 has 812 unit
tests. Results of those tests:
BEA WebLogic JRockit(TM) 1.4.2_04 JVM :
810 tests, 1 failure, 1 error (99.75%)
Harmony DRLVM version 11.2.0
766 tests, 2
that's a great idea.
Have you isolated any of the errors?
geir
On Aug 17, 2006, at 10:40 AM, Anton Luht wrote:
Hello,
Now some people in this list are trying to make ActiveMQ run on
Harmony. ActiveMQ is based on MX4J [1] . MX4J 3.0.1 has 812 unit
tests. Results of those tests:
BEA WebLogic
FYI : cannot reproduce on the classlib r432241 running on IBM VME
Windows XP. Freemind seems to work fine there[1].
[1] http://people.apache.org/~tellison/Harmony-1209.jpg
Regards,
Tim
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
Salikh,
as far as I understood he runs a snapshot...
SY, Alexey
2006/8/17,
Andrew Zhang wrote:
Hi folks,
After applying Harmony-1024, tests.api.java.net.DatagramSocketTest passes
against Harmony on my machine.
Before enabling it, I'd like to hear more feedbacks from community. Would
you please provide your test result on running DatagramSocketTest against
Vladimir,
I was trying a buildtest module from svn repository.
You wrote,
When I tried to run it for the first time I saw problems with get
and svn commands - they did not work in my environment due to:
- no proxy settings for get and exec svn command.
- some problems with my certificate for
well, yeah. clearly it's DRLVM
geir
On Aug 17, 2006, at 11:34 AM, Tim Ellison wrote:
FYI : cannot reproduce on the classlib r432241 running on IBM VME
Windows XP. Freemind seems to work fine there[1].
[1] http://people.apache.org/~tellison/Harmony-1209.jpg
Regards,
Tim
Alexey Petrenko
Great! Thanks.
This is very useful tool.
SY, Alexey
2006/8/17, Dmitry M. Kononov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
I have developed a tool to generate JNI-style headers. This tool is a
replacement for javah tool from the JavaSE 1.5.0. I would like it to
be included in Harmony tools sections.
The
Hi!
Have a look at
http://common.l2fprod.com/
https://l2fprod.dev.java.net/
https://l2fprod-common.dev.java.net/
there existing a JFontChooser
https://l2fprod-common.dev.java.net/images/FontChooser.jpg
under the Apache License. :-)
And at
http://jfontchooser.sourceforge.net/
is one under the
I'm sure they'll make JDK7 open source...
geir
On Aug 17, 2006, at 2:35 PM, theUser BL wrote:
Hi!
Have a look at
http://common.l2fprod.com/
https://l2fprod.dev.java.net/
https://l2fprod-common.dev.java.net/
there existing a JFontChooser
Not yet. I think that making minimal test cases from JUnit tests is
simpler than making ones from an application though. I'm going to get
down to it soon - I just wanted to discuss it before acting to make
sure that nobody objects such approach.
On 8/17/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 17, 2006, at 3:28 PM, Anton Luht wrote:
Not yet. I think that making minimal test cases from JUnit tests is
simpler than making ones from an application though. I'm going to get
down to it soon - I just wanted to discuss it before acting to make
sure that nobody objects such approach.
All is in order and in SVN for Harmony-1044 wrt BCC and ACQ.
Please vote to accept or reject this codebase into the Apache Harmony
class library :
[ ] + 1 Accept
[ ] -1 Reject (provide reason below)
Lets let this run a minimum of 3 days unless a) someone states they need
more time or b) we
All is in order and in SVN for Harmony-1105 wrt BCC and ACQ.
Please vote to accept or reject this codebase into the Apache Harmony
class library :
[ ] + 1 Accept
[ ] -1 Reject (provide reason below)
Lets let this run a minimum of 3 days unless a) someone states they need
more time or b) we
All is in order and in SVN for Harmony-1125 wrt BCC and ACQ.
Please vote to accept or reject this codebase into the Apache Harmony
class library :
[ ] + 1 Accept
[ ] -1 Reject (provide reason below)
Lets let this run a minimum of 3 days unless a) someone states they need
more time or b) we
2006/8/17, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Aug 17, 2006, at 3:28 PM, Anton Luht wrote:
Not yet. I think that making minimal test cases from JUnit tests is
simpler than making ones from an application though. I'm going to get
down to it soon - I just wanted to discuss it before
+1
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
All is in order and in SVN for Harmony-1044 wrt BCC and ACQ.
Please vote to accept or reject this codebase into the Apache Harmony
class library :
[ ] + 1 Accept
[ ] -1 Reject (provide reason below)
Lets let this run a minimum of 3 days unless a) someone
+1
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
All is in order and in SVN for Harmony-1105 wrt BCC and ACQ.
Please vote to accept or reject this codebase into the Apache Harmony
class library :
[ ] + 1 Accept
[ ] -1 Reject (provide reason below)
Lets let this run a minimum of 3 days unless a) someone
+1
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
All is in order and in SVN for Harmony-1125 wrt BCC and ACQ.
Please vote to accept or reject this codebase into the Apache Harmony
class library :
[ ] + 1 Accept
[ ] -1 Reject (provide reason below)
Lets let this run a minimum of 3 days unless a) someone
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
2006/8/17, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Aug 17, 2006, at 3:28 PM, Anton Luht wrote:
Not yet. I think that making minimal test cases from JUnit tests is
simpler than making ones from an application though. I'm going to get
down to it soon - I just
On 8/17/06, Mikhail Fursov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Weldon,
I agree that we need TLS access in vmmagic, but I thought about slightly
different and more primitive implementation.
Writing something like this:
SegmentRegisterFS segFs = new SegmentRegisterFS();
or this:
SegmentRegisterGS segGs =
On 8/17/06, Morozova, Nadezhda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I found some GC requirements description in the OPEN spec [1], section
5.3.5 and something inside 6.*. How does those suggestions relate to
what is being discussed?
Actually section 5.3.5 describes an interface between GC and JVM.
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
+1
+1
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
All is in order and in SVN for Harmony-1044 wrt BCC and ACQ.
Please vote to accept or reject this codebase into the Apache Harmony
class library :
[ ] + 1 Accept
[ ] -1 Reject (provide reason below)
Lets let this run a
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
+1
+1
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
All is in order and in SVN for Harmony-1105 wrt BCC and ACQ.
Please vote to accept or reject this codebase into the Apache Harmony
class library :
[ ] + 1 Accept
[ ] -1 Reject (provide reason below)
Lets let this run a minimum
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
+1
+0, I don't know enough to understand if this is good or bad
don't take this as diplomatic negative vote, I just don't like to vote
on things I don't know enough about.
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
All is in order and in SVN for Harmony-1125 wrt BCC and ACQ.
Tim Ellison wrote:
Andrew Zhang wrote:
Hi folks,
After applying Harmony-1024, tests.api.java.net.DatagramSocketTest passes
against Harmony on my machine.
Before enabling it, I'd like to hear more feedbacks from community. Would
you please provide your test result on running
Hi, all:
I wonder if we need to get the exception from the exec framework. As an
exec result, we need only get whether it succeeds or not. Besides, I do not
think it is so reliable to parse error message to get exception.
We can design sophisticated testcase to deduce whether the expected
Tim Ellison wrote:
Andrew Zhang wrote:
Hi folks,
After applying Harmony-1024, tests.api.java.net.DatagramSocketTest passes
against Harmony on my machine.
Before enabling it, I'd like to hear more feedbacks from community. Would
you please provide your test result on running
build of drlvm failed today on my pc with message:
[cc] compile.cpp
[cc] C:\harmony\drlvm1.5\vm\vmcore\src\jit\compile.cpp(750) : error
C3861: 'get_default_stack_size': identifier not found, even with
argument-dependent lookup
Could anybody reproduce it or it is my local failure?
On the 0x1C8 day of Apache Harmony Mikhail Fursov wrote:
Egor,
Why do you think we need to support platform specific issues in helpers? Is
there any example that shows that we can't write a helper without reference
platform details?
It depends on how much of a helper code we want to write in
53 matches
Mail list logo
