Re: performance of drlvm

2006-08-25 Thread zouqiong
En, I list some paper I have read. 1.Efficient Representations and Abstractions for Quantifying and Exploiting Data Reference Locality. 2.Bursty Tracing: A Framework for Low-Overhead Temporal Profiling 3.Dynamic Hot Data Stream Prefetching for General-Purpose Programs 4.Profile-guided

Re: [vm] ArgoUML application crashes IBM VME

2006-08-25 Thread Vladimir Gorr
On 8/24/06, Oliver Deakin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Vladimir Gorr wrote: On 8/23/06, Oliver Deakin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Vladimir, Ive taken a quick look at your bug report, and at first glance the Windows stack trace says: Caused by: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: gl (Not found

Re: [ClassLib][Instrument]Put tests to Harmony (and Support_Exec)

2006-08-25 Thread Oliver Deakin
Jimmy, Jing Lv wrote: Oliver Deakin wrote: Jimmy, Jing Lv wrote: Hi, The development on instrument is going to an end (I may still apply a few patches of refine). And the tests for it do help a lot in finding bugs and applying compatibility with RI, and special thanks to Stepan and

Re: [jira] Resolved: (HARMONY-1271) Writing '\n' to LogStream produces stack overflow

2006-08-25 Thread Alexey Petrenko
Mark, can you please commit the fix for http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-994. It is very close issue for this one. Thanks in advance. SY, Alexey 2006/8/25, Mark Hindess (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1271?page=all ] Mark Hindess

Re: [DRLVM][VM] -- which header bits are available for GC mark and GC forwarding use?

2006-08-25 Thread Ivan Volosyuk
Weldon, look at the patch in http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1269. I have already done this work. After the patch you have whole lowest byte + 2 bits in the second byte for GC use; in expense of implementing hashcode by GC. In my understanding the hashcode can be reduced to 2 status

Re: [jira] Resolved: (HARMONY-1271) Writing '\n' to LogStream produces stack overflow

2006-08-25 Thread Mark Hindess
On 25 August 2006 at 13:05, Alexey Petrenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark, can you please commit the fix for http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-994. It is very close issue for this one. Yeah, I noticed. I'm just doing it. ;-) And I'll add the one-line for the regression test of

Re: [DRLVM][GC] high-level design proposal for GCV5

2006-08-25 Thread Salikh Zakirov
Ivan Volosyuk wrote: Yes, I have experimented with per-slot verification of write barrier. The idea was the following: each word in java heap has external mirror record. After garbage collection all mirror records are synchronized with the heap. Each write barrier updates mirror record with

Re: [DRLVM][GC] high-level design proposal for GCV5

2006-08-25 Thread Xiao-Feng Li
Ivan, Salikh, good idea and thanks for the info. We'd want to apply the work into Harmony GC. Thanks, xiaofeng On 8/25/06, Salikh Zakirov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ivan Volosyuk wrote: Yes, I have experimented with per-slot verification of write barrier. The idea was the following: each

Re: [jira] Resolved: (HARMONY-1271) Writing '\n' to LogStream produces stack overflow

2006-08-25 Thread Alexey Petrenko
Thanks :) 2006/8/25, Mark Hindess [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 25 August 2006 at 13:05, Alexey Petrenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark, can you please commit the fix for http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-994. It is very close issue for this one. Yeah, I noticed. I'm just doing it.

[classlib] HARMONY-790 is not reproducible

2006-08-25 Thread Alexey Petrenko
Committers, can anybody of you close HARMONY-790 issue please. Since it is not reproducible on current build. We got a huge number of open JIRA issues which are has patches or not reproducible... SY, Alexey -- Alexey A. Petrenko Intel Middleware Products Division

Re: [DRLVM][VM] -- which header bits are available for GC mark and GC forwarding use?

2006-08-25 Thread Andrey Chernyshev
On 8/25/06, Weldon Washburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/24/06, Salikh Zakirov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In any way, currently there is no single header file in the system, which would describe the object structure. Rather, DRLVM uses some static assumptions about object header, which are not

RE: [jira] Updated: (HARMONY-1137) [classlib][swing/text] unit test AbstractDocument_DefaultDocumentEventTest fails

2006-08-25 Thread Ivanov, Alexey A
Hello, Can someone take a look and apply patches from HARMONY-1137 [1]? There's also a patch to un-exclude the tests which stop failing after applying the patch for HARMONY-1028 [2]. These tests are: javax.swing.text.AbstractDocument_DefaultDocumentEventTest,

Re: [classlib] HARMONY-790 is not reproducible

2006-08-25 Thread Mark Hindess
On 25 August 2006 at 15:47, Alexey Petrenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Committers, can anybody of you close HARMONY-790 issue please. Since it is not reproducible on current build. Is the regression test also obsolete - i.e. covered elsewhere? If not, then perhaps that should be integrated

[classlib][TestNG] groups of Harmony test

2006-08-25 Thread Richard Liang
Hello All, Now let's talk about the TestNG groups. I have read the related threads which posted by George, Vladimir Ivanov and Alexei Zakharov. All of them are good discussion about TestNG groups. IMHO, we may define Harmony test groups according the following 4 dimensions: 1) [Platform]

Re: [DRLVM][VM] -- which header bits are available for GC mark and GC forwarding use?

2006-08-25 Thread Ivan Volosyuk
On 8/25/06, Andrey Chernyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/25/06, Weldon Washburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/24/06, Salikh Zakirov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In any way, currently there is no single header file in the system, which would describe the object structure. Rather, DRLVM uses

Re: [DRLVM][GC] Goals for 2006/2007

2006-08-25 Thread Ivan Volosyuk
On 8/15/06, Robin Garner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Weldon Washburn wrote: All, There is rough consensus that the immediate goal for Harmony JVM is to reliably run simple commercial workloads with acceptable performance. In regards to a garbage collector for a Harmony JVM in 2006 there are

[classlib] Sun compiler change?

2006-08-25 Thread Nathan Beyer
Is anyone else using the latest Sun JDK, v5.0 Update 8 on Windows? I'm seeing a compilation error in the LUNI that I don't see with 5.0 Update 7. Here's the error I'm getting. compile: [mkdir] Created dir: C:\dev\harmony\enhanced\classlib\trunk\build\classes [javac] Compiling

Re: performance of drlvm

2006-08-25 Thread Ivan Volosyuk
On 8/25/06, Mikhail Fursov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/25/06, zouqiong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... This is the key problem. I hope I will have an opinion on it when I read all of the articles you mentioned. The only idea I have now is that using an address of an object is not a problem.