On 8/30/06, Richard Liang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Also some tag for regression tests should be added.
Yes. Do you think we could annotate regression test as
*level.regression*? Thanks a lot.
Yes, I do. While tests can have more than one group it will enough.
On 8/30/06, Andrew Zhang wrote:
Hi folks,
When SecurityManager is enabled and all file permissions are disabled, RI
fails to new a FileHandler while Harmony allows.
Following test code shows the differences:
public void test_FileHandler() throws Exception {
FileHandler handler = new
On 8/30/06, Stepan Mishura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/30/06, Andrew Zhang wrote:
Hi folks,
When SecurityManager is enabled and all file permissions are disabled,
RI
fails to new a FileHandler while Harmony allows.
Following test code shows the differences:
public void
Mark and Geir thanks a lot. I understand you need time but most of
them have pretty simple patches.
2006/8/30, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Also, remember that people have to review the patch and decide that it's
reasonable, not just blindly add them.
That said, I'll start looking as
On 8/30/06, Andrew Zhang wrote:
On 8/30/06, Stepan Mishura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was browsing thought logging tests and realized that running logging
test
suite cause updates of tested JRE configuration.
The ant script changes jre/lib/logging.properties file by:
target
Hi, Jimmy!
It's great that you are interested in it!
Unfortunately there is no automatic externalization generation tool that
fits our needs. However, you can combine Eclipse externalization tool with
some manual work to get what is need. You can take a look into the
[classlib]strings
On 30 August 2006 at 11:14, Denis Kishenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark and Geir thanks a lot. I understand you need time but most of
them have pretty simple patches.
Just because they are simple doesn't mean we can apply them without
thinking or without taking the time to run sufficient
Stepan Mishura wrote:
On 8/30/06, Andrew Zhang wrote:
On 8/30/06, Stepan Mishura wrote:
On 8/30/06, Andrew Zhang wrote:
Hi folks,
When SecurityManager is enabled and all file permissions are
disabled,
RI
fails to new a FileHandler while Harmony allows.
Following test code
+1
However, I'd also like to hear the end of the dependency saga.
It would also be useful (when the vote is complete) to have an up to
date patch. The current patch has lots of rejects due to previously
applied hunks, etc. It will be quite difficult to integrate in its
current state.
Regards,
On 8/30/06, Stepan Mishura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/30/06, Andrew Zhang wrote:
On 8/30/06, Stepan Mishura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was browsing thought logging tests and realized that running logging
test
suite cause updates of tested JRE configuration.
The ant script
On 8/30/06, Stepan Mishura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/30/06, Andrew Zhang wrote:
On 8/30/06, Stepan Mishura wrote:
On 8/30/06, Andrew Zhang wrote:
Hi folks,
When SecurityManager is enabled and all file permissions are
disabled,
RI
fails to new a FileHandler while
On 8/30/06, Andrew Zhang wrote:
On 8/30/06, Stepan Mishura wrote:
On 8/30/06, Andrew Zhang wrote:
On 8/30/06, Stepan Mishura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was browsing thought logging tests and realized that running
logging
test
suite cause updates of tested JRE
+1
On 8/30/06, Mark Hindess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
However, I'd also like to hear the end of the dependency saga.
It would also be useful (when the vote is complete) to have an up to
date patch. The current patch has lots of rejects due to previously
applied hunks, etc. It will be
I'd add
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-650
to the list of unassigned issues with patches. It has a patch for the
test also. Could somebody take a look, please?
On 8/30/06, Stepan Mishura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/30/06, Mark Hindess wrote:
On 30 August 2006 at 11:14, Denis
On 30 August 2006 at 14:02, Sergey Soldatov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually all these rejects were integrated during Swing text
integration and they doesn't matter.
Ok, but it would still be more reassuring to have a clean patch.
Currently, the only way I'd be confident that the patch has
Hi,
I have just tried to use JIRA to see how many unapplied patches are there for
DRLVM,
but couldn't search just for the issues with patch provided.
Does anyone know of a good way to find just the issues with patches submitted?
If there is no good way, probably subtasks feature of JIRA could
Anton,
Sorry for a long response. Here is what I've been able to make out of
the Keytool help document. At first I thought of generating a diff, but
then saw that too much has changed and giving a newer version of the
file might have more common sense in it.
Key changes in the doc:
- added
The selection of header bits for object hash is controlled by HASH_MASK
located in mon_enter_exit.h. By happy coincidence, there was an unused bit
in the header. The old version:
#define HASH_MASK 0x7e
The hacked on version for MMTk:
#define HASH_MASK 0xfc
A question for those who know the
On 30 August 2006 at 12:03, Stepan Mishura [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I was browsing thought logging tests and realized that running logging test
suite cause updates of tested JRE configuration.
The ant script changes jre/lib/logging.properties file by:
target name=copy.resources
Mark,
I'll clean up the patch from those fixes which were applied during HTML
integration, and attach the new one.
A quick look shows that Sergey is right, and many Swing fixes have been
applied already.
Regards,
Alexey.
--
Alexey A. Ivanov
Intel Middleware Product Division
-Original
Thanks!
-Mark.
On 30 August 2006 at 17:56, Ivanov, Alexey A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark,
I'll clean up the patch from those fixes which were applied during HTML
integration, and attach the new one.
A quick look shows that Sergey is right, and many Swing fixes have been
applied
Andrew Zhang wrote:
Yes, they're different. :-) Static first initialization acts differently
from readConfiguration if you take a look at the source code. :)
But I do agree that we should not change jre config in this way! I suggest
solve this problem in following way:
1. backup jre default
Ok, but the correct way here is probably not a completely new patch, but
one that can follow the original patch with fix-ups
geir
Ivanov, Alexey A wrote:
Mark,
I'll clean up the patch from those fixes which were applied during HTML
integration, and attach the new one.
A quick look
can you add as a JIRA so we can just integrate into the site?
Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
Anton,
Sorry for a long response. Here is what I've been able to make out of
the Keytool help document. At first I thought of generating a diff, but
then saw that too much has changed and giving a newer
On 30 August 2006 at 10:54, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, but the correct way here is probably not a completely new patch, but
one that can follow the original patch with fix-ups
I don't think I understand what you mean. So I'd do:
1) apply the original patch with
Mark Hindess wrote:
On 30 August 2006 at 10:54, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, but the correct way here is probably not a completely new patch, but
one that can follow the original patch with fix-ups
I don't think I understand what you mean. So I'd do:
1) apply the
I'm going to be the patcher.
If you can assert that when I apply the patch to SVN head that I'll be
all right, I'll take your word for it.
geir
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
Most (probably all) of the failures are already applied failures.
So additional patch has no sense here.
Alexey can just
Time to take another run at this since I didn't get any responses on
the drlvm thread.
We have the problem that DRLVM uses SIGUSR2 in the thread manager
(not an unreasonable thing to do, I believe) but this results in
knocking threads out of select() in hysock.c (and I'm sure we'll see
+1
I've tried to use this before too - it would be really useful to also be
able to find issues without patches for people looking for something to work
on.
Regards,
Sian
On 30/08/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Salikh Zakirov wrote:
Hi,
I have just tried to use JIRA
Salikh Zakirov wrote:
I have also seen that other projects in JIRA use Patch available
status,
Geir Magnusson Jr. replied:
We could turn this on for non-committers - I see no danger... does anyone?
That would be great!
JIRA seems to log all changes to the issues, and important information
Hello,
I've tried to run 'ant test' in classlib on a recent build hand-made
from SVN and came across several problems.
First problem was that a popup window with assertion appeared - it was
easy to solve it - see HARMONY-1340 .
The second one is more tricky for me.
---details start---
vm
Yep, I had some popups while run tests on drlvm.
But I do not remember exact message.
SY, Alexey
2006/8/30, Anton Luht [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I've tried to run 'ant test' in classlib on a recent build hand-made
from SVN and came across several problems.
First problem was that a popup
I agree. That's a good idea.
2006/8/30, Salikh Zakirov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Salikh Zakirov wrote:
I have also seen that other projects in JIRA use Patch available
status,
Geir Magnusson Jr. replied:
We could turn this on for non-committers - I see no danger... does anyone?
That would be
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 19:29 Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
So - does anyone have any other bright ideas? Why don't we see this
with J9?Would it be better to do a per-thread signal mask after
asking the thread manager what signal it's using du jour? (Andrey
noted that Sun allows one to
Try this for classlib :
$ svn update
$ ant clean
$ ant
$ cd modules/luni
$ ant test -Dtest.case=tests/api/java/net/DatagramSocketTest
I get a java.io.FileNotFoundException when the ant JUNIT task is
trying to createFormatter(). I've tried this on Ubuntu 6 w/ DRLVM
and J9, and winXP w/ J9.
On Aug 30, 2006, at 8:04 PM, Gregory Shimansky wrote:
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 19:29 Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
So - does anyone have any other bright ideas? Why don't we see this
with J9?Would it be better to do a per-thread signal mask after
asking the thread manager what signal it's
Could you please prefix your subject lines with [drlvm] to help
people sort through the mail traffic?
geir
On Aug 30, 2006, at 10:14 PM, zouqiong wrote:
Hi,
I am reading JET in DRLVM now. And try to add some profile
instrument via
JET, mainly recording the memory accessing patterns.
On 8/30/06, Mark Hindess wrote:
On 30 August 2006 at 12:03, Stepan Mishura
wrote:
Hi,
I was browsing thought logging tests and realized that running logging
test
suite cause updates of tested JRE configuration.
The ant script changes jre/lib/logging.properties file by:
target
Hi,
I am reading JET in DRLVM now. And try to add some profile instrument via
JET, mainly recording the memory accessing patterns. Anyone who are
interested with it can discuss with me. Thanks!
--
Best Regards,
Qiong,Zou
On 8/31/06, Stepan Mishura wrote:
On 8/30/06, Mark Hindess wrote:
On 30 August 2006 at 12:03, Stepan Mishura
wrote:
Hi,
I was browsing thought logging tests and realized that running logging
test
suite cause updates of tested JRE configuration.
The ant script changes
On the 0x1D6 day of Apache Harmony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am reading JET in DRLVM now. And try to add some profile instrument via
JET, mainly recording the memory accessing patterns.
Sounds interesting again :)
Anyone who are interested with it can discuss with me. Thanks!
2006/8/30, Anton Luht [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I've tried to run 'ant test' in classlib on a recent build hand-made
from SVN and came across several problems.
First problem was that a popup window with assertion appeared - it was
easy to solve it - see HARMONY-1340 .
The second one is more
42 matches
Mail list logo
