On 11/8/06, Alexey Petrenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we want to have unnamed milestones, the solution could be: every
last
month of a quoter is a stability period. No new features are accepted
during
this period. This could work for a long period of time without need
in additional
Hi, I submited a patch to enable parallel compaction of GCv5. It now
works in Windows. Please don't expect any performance improvement yet
since I care only about the framework at the moment. And it's not a
full parallel compactor because not all phases are parallelized, but
that would be easier.
Stepan Mishura wrote:
Hi Alexei,
Sorry, I don't understand your logic. Is the test case valid? If there was
another bug (for example: [another_VM][unit] half of classlib beans tests
crashes VM), would you agree to comment out a half of beans tests?
Thanks Stepan, I had also intended to
Stuart Ballard wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
I'm no fan of stubs for just such reason. But for those dev's that are
following along, there is an
org.apache.harmony.luni.util.NotYetImplementedException that is defined
for just such purposes.
Would you consider renaming this to
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Yeah, put some logging statements in. Ask Tim if you need some help ;)
LOL, I'd be delighted. Of course, native code is different since there
is no opportunity for introspection by the VM, so in this case logging
is a necessary evil^W technique.
Regards,
Tim
I
2006/11/8, Alexey Petrenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2006/11/8, Anton Rusanov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Cocoon 2.1.9 now works on Harmony (IBM VME + Classlib)!
It starts and works normally.
Great news!
Have you tried it with DRLVM?
I'm trying to start Cocoon on DRLVM, but currently unsuccessfully.
It
On 11/8/06, Tim Ellison wrote:
Nathan Beyer wrote:
I just looked at the changes you made and have a question about this
snippet.
+if (VM.callerClassLoader() != null) {
+throw new SecurityException(Unsafe);
+}
I just want to understand what this actually
* While checking up the Hello, World! sample it was discovered that
Cocoon failed to display the JPEG representation of that text because
of this error: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
com.sun.image.codec.jpeg.JPEGCodec.
We have jpeg encoder. But it has another name :)
Probably we need
Really BIG -1 from me.
As Aleksey (Ignatenko) described in original thread, j/l/Class'es and
j/l/ClassLoader's are always available in rootset, so even if no objects
of a class exist, this class will be reachable.
Actually, some sort of class unloading prototype exists in DRLVM code, which
Stepan,
I must be missing something obvious...
What kind of regression test do you expect?
What was done is the signature of the GapContent.replace had been
changed so that it didn't contain 'throws BadLocationException' clause.
What is a regression test to demonstrate? That
Aleksey Ignatenko wrote:
Hi, Robin.
I do really like this proposed idea of marking VTables from objects via
additional word field in VTable.
But I have one question about detecting reachability of the classloaders
(sweep the vtables and check the reachability of the classloaders).
Possibly I
Hi Rana.
I extend guard region as work around. It's only one way, which fix SOE on
my SuSE Linux, without potential regression of your fix. On my Linux machine
violation access signals happen one page before protected page on the stack.
It's it.
I ran all tests, and everything was OK. But
Robin,
The kind of model I had in mind was along the lines of:
- VM maintains a linked list (or other collection type) of the currently
loaded classloaders, each of which in turn maintains the collection of
classes loaded by that type. The sweep of classloaders goes something
like:
for
no regression policy should be relevant to a number of *small* tests
that are easy to run and are running fast, to make them good as pre-commit
criteria.
Actually, I'm thinking about the following model (which goes a little bit
beyond pre-commit testing):
**Unit testing: new feature is
Pavel Pervov wrote:
Really BIG -1 from me.
As Aleksey (Ignatenko) described in original thread, j/l/Class'es and
j/l/ClassLoader's are always available in rootset, so even if no objects
of a class exist, this class will be reachable.
Actually, some sort of class unloading prototype exists in
Hi Daniel
I've tried the patch you suggested. It causes failure of
org.apache.harmony.tests.java.math.BigDecimalArithmeticTest
Could you please take a look?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/11/8, Daniel Fridlender [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
In http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2091 there is an
In general I agrre with what Oleg says. Some comment are below
2006/11/8, Oleg Oleinik [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
no regression policy should be relevant to a number of *small* tests
that are easy to run and are running fast, to make them good as pre-commit
criteria.
Actually, I'm thinking about the
Stepan Mishura wrote:
On 11/8/06, Tim Ellison wrote:
Nathan Beyer wrote:
I just looked at the changes you made and have a question about this
snippet.
+if (VM.callerClassLoader() != null) {
+throw new SecurityException(Unsafe);
+}
I just want to
Richard Liang wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Richard Liang wrote:
On 11/7/06, Nathan Beyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe we're down to agreeing to the Objects/Threads classes [1] in
luni-kernel and getting them implemented in DRLVM and the donated IBM
VM. I believe the Unsafe class
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
So, according to Wheeler's metric, Harmony would have taken 46 million
dollars to build.
If anyone's interested I'll rewrite it for only $40M (upfront)...
...but it will require an advance in medical technology to keep me alive
for the next 350 years
classlib
Nathan Beyer wrote:
Instead of continuing to add functionality to the DRLVM-specific
Atomics class, I'd like to get a consensus on the Threads/Objects
(include CAS operations) interfaces in luni-kernel. Then we can get
DRLVM to implement these classes and the donated IBM VM to do the same
so
Hi,
Do we really need a smiley in the header: Resolution Provider :)?
AFAIK, for headings one should use Title Capitalization, i.e. first
letter of each word is capitalized with exception for articles,
prepositions, and conjunctions. Or am I wrong?
Does anyone mind to mark up file names
Robin.
OK, well how about keeping a weak reference to the j.l.ClassLoader
object instead of a strong one. When the reference becomes (strong)ly
unreachable, invoke the class-unloading phase.
If you have weak reference to j.l.Classloader - GC will collect it (with all
appropriate jlClasses)
Aleksey Ignatenko wrote:
Robin.
OK, well how about keeping a weak reference to the j.l.ClassLoader
object instead of a strong one. When the reference becomes (strong)ly
unreachable, invoke the class-unloading phase.
If you have weak reference to j.l.Classloader - GC will collect it (with
Robin Garner wrote:
Aleksey Ignatenko wrote:
Robin.
OK, well how about keeping a weak reference to the j.l.ClassLoader
object instead of a strong one. When the reference becomes (strong)ly
unreachable, invoke the class-unloading phase.
If you have weak reference to j.l.Classloader - GC
Alexey wrote:
Do we really need a smiley in the header: Resolution Provider :)?
Of course not, since it's not just a friendly correspondence:) suggest
to remove.
AFAIK, for headings one should use Title Capitalization, i.e. first
letter of each word is capitalized with exception for articles,
On 11/8/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nathan Beyer wrote:
Instead of continuing to add functionality to the DRLVM-specific
Atomics class, I'd like to get a consensus on the Threads/Objects
(include CAS operations) interfaces in luni-kernel. Then we can get
Seems like last time we
On 11/8/06, Ivanov, Alexey A wrote:
Stepan,
I must be missing something obvious...
What kind of regression test do you expect?
My logic is quite straightforward: the best way to fix a decision is to
create a regression test. For example, if another volunteer find out that
Harmony
BWT, HARMONY-1809 should be marked as non-bug difference from RI.
I don't think that it's non-bug diff since it fixes an API issue.
On 11/8/06, Stepan Mishura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/8/06, Ivanov, Alexey A wrote:
Stepan,
I must be missing something obvious...
What kind of
-Original Message-
From: Oleg Khaschansky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 4:20 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r472115 -
/incubator/harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/swing/src/main/java/
comm
Evgueni Brevnov wrote:
On 11/8/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oliver Deakin wrote:
SNIP!
2) The bogus FAILED to invoke JVM message.
Looks like this is coming from the launcher (Im running
Harmony + IBM VME).
It appears that this happens because in main_runJavaMain
(in the
-Original Message-
From: Stepan Mishura [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 4:09 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r472115 -
/incubator/harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/swing/src/main/java/
comm
Tim Ellison wrote:
Oliver Deakin wrote:
Hi all,
I was checking out some JIRAs and spotted that when we
print exception stack traces at the moment we're not getting
the full NLS message. For example, running the following:
public class Test {
public static void main(String[] args) throws
OK thanks Pavel, I'll try the patch today.
Rana
On 11/8/06, Pavel Afremov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rana.
I extend guard region as work around. It's only one way, which fix SOE
on
my SuSE Linux, without potential regression of your fix. On my Linux
machine
violation access signals
Hello all,
I've read through the Getting Started with
DRLhttp://incubator.apache.org/harmony/subcomponents/drlvm/getting_started.html
document on the Harmony web and found it completely outdated, for example:
- the term DRL is used instead of DRLVM
- eclipse.bat and eclipse.sh are obsolete
2006/11/8, Oliver Deakin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Evgueni Brevnov wrote:
On 11/8/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oliver Deakin wrote:
SNIP!
2) The bogus FAILED to invoke JVM message.
Looks like this is coming from the launcher (Im running
Harmony + IBM VME).
It appears that this
Alexey Varlamov wrote:
2006/11/8, Oliver Deakin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Evgueni Brevnov wrote:
On 11/8/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oliver Deakin wrote:
SNIP!
2) The bogus FAILED to invoke JVM message.
Looks like this is coming from the launcher (Im running
Harmony + IBM VME).
Guys,
to get a consensus on the interfaces is very good, but this issue is
not about interfaces. j.u.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLong in its original
implementation has private native method: boolean VMSupportsCS8(),
thus to work with original concurrent classes any VM should export
following
Pavel,
JIRA and patch are welcome :)
SY, Alexey
2006/11/8, Pavel Ozhdikhin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello all,
I've read through the Getting Started with
DRLhttp://incubator.apache.org/harmony/subcomponents/drlvm/getting_started.html
document on the Harmony web and found it completely outdated, for
It's not a hard to write a documenation once, it's hard to support it :)
More problems:
1) -Xem options are obsolete.
2) -Xjit options are also obsolete.
3) Do we really need this page today? AFAIU users expect Harmony VM is able
to run the same apps as RI..
?
On 11/8/06, Pavel Ozhdikhin [EMAIL
Hi folks,
According to the japi result, there're 0.29% bad, and 8.7% missing APIs in
javax.sound.sampled package. I'd like to work on this package to make the
statistics look better. :) Anyone else is interested too?
Please let me know if you have any concern/comment/suggestion. :) Thanks!
--
I've just submitted a new JIRA
[http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2110].
I've added the necessary links from the website to the new page and have
tried to perfect it a little.
It would be great, if you could find a chance to look through the patch.
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
http://www.crn.com/sections/breakingnews/breakingnews.jhtml;?articleId=193600331
--
Best regards,
Andrew Zhang
2006/11/7, Vladimir Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 11/7/06, Alexey Varlamov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But do we have needed scripts/tools readily available to run and
analyze such stability testing? I'm also pretty sure existing c-unit
and smoke tests would help to reveal certain problems if
Alexey Varlamov wrote:
2006/11/8, Oliver Deakin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Evgueni Brevnov wrote:
On 11/8/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oliver Deakin wrote:
SNIP!
2) The bogus FAILED to invoke JVM message.
Looks like this is coming from the launcher (Im running
Harmony + IBM VME).
Hi Sveta,
Yes - I'm happy to take a look at that page. I was just thinking that if we
remove the Am I Eligible? section we should probably make sure it is
somewhere else. My proposal is to add it to the Get Involved page -
http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/get-involved.html as I think it's
All,
I'd like to share everyone's grief at the sight of outdated Getting
Started document. However, I'd not hurry to eliminate the page as such.
We might reconsider some of its contents, change structure, and update
individual bits, but please think carefully before removing the page.
I think
About strange things in the website structure: good catch!
I guess the site is just in the middle of some transition:
dev_eclipse_movie.html and dev_eclipse.html probably should be under
documentation, not under subcomponents/classlib. And build_classlib is
just outdated and should not be there
Alexey,
As you suggested I put is the resolution to
http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/ANT_FAQ
With best regards,
Alexei Fedotov,
Intel Java XML Engineering
-Original Message-
From: Alexey Petrenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 12:18 PM
To:
Alexey Petrenko wrote,
The only release I can imagine is Harmony Java5SE 100% compatible.
To be Java5SE 100% compatible we need TCK first.
+1
I hesitate to say that again, but we also need to decide about VM we
will use for that release. I like the following mission: Class library
and DRLVM pass
Hello
I've seen the same failure of clean target several times. Does anyone know why
it happens? When I run clean again, it usually succeeds. The failure is 100%
reproducible, clean usually works, but sometimes finds some files which
weren't deleted.
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 22:05 [EMAIL
Nadya,
I have failed to find web pages copyrighted by IBM on Apache using
Google. Apache copyright usually contains no more than two lines. This
page has fourty lines of legal staff. Is it really needed?
Thanks!
On 11/8/06, Morozova, Nadezhda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I'd like to share
Salikh
I've applied your patch in HARMONY-2112 but I have a question to you. There is
a new condition in jvmti_capability.cpp with the following comment:
// if the global capability can_tag_objects has already been enabled,
// requested by this environment, but not yet posessed by this
Robin,
thank you for detailed description of the algorithm. IMHO, this was
the most complicated place of the whole story: how to have a weak
reference to classloader and still be able to get it alive again. This
shouldn't be performance critical part and is quite doable. I
absolutely agree with
On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 02:01 +0300, Ivan Volosyuk wrote:
Robin,
thank you for detailed description of the algorithm. IMHO, this was
the most complicated place of the whole story: how to have a weak
reference to classloader and still be able to get it alive again. This
shouldn't be
Tim Ellison wrote:
Richard Liang wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Richard Liang wrote:
On 11/7/06, Nathan Beyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe we're down to agreeing to the Objects/Threads classes [1] in
luni-kernel and getting them implemented in DRLVM and the
Richard Liang wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Richard Liang wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Richard Liang wrote:
On 11/7/06, Nathan Beyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe we're down to agreeing to the Objects/Threads classes
[1] in
luni-kernel and getting them implemented
Richard Liang wrote:
Richard Liang wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Richard Liang wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Richard Liang wrote:
On 11/7/06, Nathan Beyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe we're down to agreeing to the Objects/Threads classes
[1] in
luni-kernel and
No problem on the name change, but doesn't what Stuart is talking
about require that methods add this exception to the signature to
actually show up in the reports?
On 11/8/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stuart Ballard wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
I'm no fan of stubs for just such
On the 0x21B day of Apache Harmony Nadezhda Morozova wrote:
All,
I'd like to share everyone's grief at the sight of outdated Getting
Started document. However, I'd not hurry to eliminate the page as such.
We might reconsider some of its contents, change structure, and update
individual bits,
On 11/8/06, Nikolay Kuznetsov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guys,
to get a consensus on the interfaces is very good, but this issue is
not about interfaces. j.u.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLong in its original
implementation has private native method: boolean VMSupportsCS8(),
thus to work with original
On 11/8/06, Andrey Chernyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/8/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nathan Beyer wrote:
Instead of continuing to add functionality to the DRLVM-specific
Atomics class, I'd like to get a consensus on the Threads/Objects
(include CAS operations)
You may want to take a quick scan of JIRA for sound items, just to
make sure there aren't any additional patches that haven't been
applied.
-Nathan
On 11/8/06, Andrew Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
According to the japi result, there're 0.29% bad, and 8.7% missing APIs in
On 11/9/06, Nathan Beyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may want to take a quick scan of JIRA for sound items, just to
make sure there aren't any additional patches that haven't been
applied.
Thanks Nathan. Seems only Harmony-1644 [1] is not applied yet, which is
about SerialVersionUID.
[1]
Well, I have problems. I was on a short trip this week - I'll be back
at home tomorrow morning, and can revisit...
geir
Mikhail Fursov wrote:
It looks very strange to me. I've just checked linux debug build with the
only change in build.sh (replaced -Dvm.jitrino.cfg=releaase to -
I don't care about cool, nor do I have any urge to separate jet if
it's not separable.
That said, I care about portability.
How hard will it be to port jet and opt to a new chip - say PPC?
geir
Egor Pasko wrote:
Refactoring Pros:
* more logical structure, looking cool
Refactoring Cons:
*
Fedotov, Alexei A wrote:
Alexey Petrenko wrote,
The only release I can imagine is Harmony Java5SE 100% compatible.
To be Java5SE 100% compatible we need TCK first.
+1
Yes - and I still think that talk of a release is a bit premature right now.
The key things that I believe we need to
Should we pull it out then? More test good!
Rana Dasgupta wrote:
On 11/5/06, Weldon Washburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/5/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
first, can we also use this test for gcv4.1?
Yes. The test is a Java test. The reason I placed it in gc_gen is
Rana Dasgupta wrote:
Again, this makes sense. Functional completenes is needed, but over a
period, based on when we want to release. Identifying a couple of
milestones
before 1.0 for which we choose features to complete, and performance
objectives can help. For each, we can add a
so, how did it go?
Weldon Washburn wrote:
On 11/7/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 03 November 2006 19:18 Weldon Washburn wrote:
H1558 has been a big battle to get it into committable shape. I would
really like to commit it first. (In fact, Pavel and I are working
Weldon Washburn wrote:
On 11/7/06, Ivan Volosyuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07 Nov 2006 14:35:55 +0600, Egor Pasko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I already have one idea how to benefit from movable vtables.
There would have to be a very compelling argument for making vtables
movable. Like a
Stuart Ballard wrote:
On 11/7/06, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Yes, the japitools list is on an FSF server. I really really hope
that this isn't going to be a political problem for you guys. I
selected Savannah for hosting japitools before Harmony even existed,
because it
I think we should be compatible as possible. People do depend on the
output (sadly). Sun does (did) recognize this problem, and started
documenting the output of toString()...
geir
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
Guys,
have we agreed on toString compatibility? Our compatibility guideline
[1] says
Egor Pasko wrote:
On the 0x21A day of Apache Harmony Mikhail Fursov wrote:
On 07 Nov 2006 18:38:23 +0600, Egor Pasko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* the relative path is still
'working_vm/vm/jitrino/src/codegenerator/ipf', but 'working_vm' would
be better. (this is a minor issue, just for
I'll sell you a copy for only $20M
geir
Tim Ellison wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
So, according to Wheeler's metric, Harmony would have taken 46 million
dollars to build.
If anyone's interested I'll rewrite it for only $40M (upfront)...
...but it will require an advance in medical
Sian January wrote:
Hi Sveta,
Yes - I'm happy to take a look at that page. I was just thinking that
if we
remove the Am I Eligible? section we should probably make sure it is
somewhere else. My proposal is to add it to the Get Involved page -
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
2006/11/8, Anton Rusanov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Cocoon 2.1.9 now works on Harmony (IBM VME + Classlib)!
It starts and works normally.
YAY!
* While checking up the Hello, World! sample it was discovered that
Cocoon failed to display the JPEG representation of that
[First, let me say that, as I am not contributing a class unloading
*implementation* to drlvm, I will understand if the project was more
inclined to chose an actually contributed piece of code over a design
without contributed implementation. :-)]
There was a -1 vote... Hmmm... As I voted +1,
I've managed to get the stacktrace of the exception which prevents
Cocoon from starting on DRLVM. Here it is.
Uncaught exception in main:
java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
at java.lang.reflect.VMReflection.invokeMethod(Native Method)
at
Hello committers,
could somebody take care about
*HARMONY-2107*http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2107?
It is trivial to fix issue allows easily identify tests that leads to vm
hang up/crash in the process of enabling classlib tests over VM.
Thanks in advance, Vladimir
What is passed to java.lang.Float.parseFloat(Float.java:335) ?
2006/11/9, Anton Rusanov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've managed to get the stacktrace of the exception which prevents
Cocoon from starting on DRLVM. Here it is.
Uncaught exception in main:
java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
On the 0x21C day of Apache Harmony Geir Magnusson, Jr. wrote:
I don't care about cool, nor do I have any urge to separate jet if
it's not separable.
That said, I care about portability.
How hard will it be to port jet and opt to a new chip - say PPC?
Experience shows that JET is much
I was making it more complex than it needs...
Here's an improvement...
1- During normal operation, the VM keeps hard references to all class
loader instances. [This prevents any premature class loader death].
2- At the start of an epoch (or just before), all vtable bits (or byte
or word) are
Is it a good news for Harmony?
On 11/9/06, Andrew Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.crn.com/sections/breakingnews/breakingnews.jhtml;?articleId=193600331
--
Best regards,
Andrew Zhang
--
Leo Li
China Software Development Lab, IBM
Thanks Dmitry and Paulex.
After applying Harmony-1887 patch, it returns valid property value.
But there's another problem. Running following code against Harmony will
print NPE while RI returns silently.
public static void main(String[] args) {
MyToolkit myToolkit = new MyToolkit();
Note: For preventing collection of class loaders related to active
method frames, there are various solutions. One could simply walk all
method frame stacks just before the end of epoch collection (my
preferred approach) and mark the bit of related vtables. Another
approach would be to add an
Probably we need to add this info to the site...
2006/11/9, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think we should be compatible as possible. People do depend on the
output (sadly). Sun does (did) recognize this problem, and started
documenting the output of toString()...
geir
Alexey
On 11/8/06, Ivanov, Alexey A wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Oleg Khaschansky
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 4:20 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r472115 -
/incubator/harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/swing/src/main/java/
comm
Java under GPL? It is probably bad news for Java developers...
As far as I understand you'll can not create non GPL application on
top of GPL Java...
License gurus, is that right?
SY, Alexey
2006/11/9, Leo Li [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is it a good news for Harmony?
On 11/9/06, Andrew Zhang [EMAIL
On 11/8/06, Ivanov, Alexey A wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Stepan Mishura
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 4:09 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r472115 -
/incubator/harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/swing/src/main/java/
comm
On 11/9/06, Alexey Petrenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew, you know a way! File a JIRA :)
ya, done, Harmony-2116.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2116
2006/11/9, Andrew Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks Dmitry and Paulex.
After applying Harmony-1887 patch, it returns valid
1558 has been committed. It took two commits since I forgot to svn add 4
files. All in all, one hundred and twenty one files were committed.
Following the commit(s), I did an rm -rf trunk, svn update, build.sh,
build.sh test on my linux box. Everything seems to work OK.
On 11/8/06, Geir
Etienne Gagnon wrote:
I was making it more complex than it needs...
Here's an improvement...
1- During normal operation, the VM keeps hard references to all class
loader instances. [This prevents any premature class loader death].
2- At the start of an epoch (or just before), all vtable bits
Leo Li wrote:
Is it a good news for Harmony?
It should be a good news if Sun chooses Apache License, Version 2.0. ;-)
On 11/9/06, Andrew Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.crn.com/sections/breakingnews/breakingnews.jhtml;?articleId=193600331
--
Best regards,
Andrew Zhang
Etienne Gagnon wrote:
3- Why would it be so hard to add an unconditional write operation
during collection (e.g. during copying or marking of an object) in
drlvm? A detailed technical explanation is welcome. :-)
I actually believe that this should be implementable in a GC-neutral
way,
On 11/8/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Weldon Washburn wrote:
On 11/7/06, Ivan Volosyuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07 Nov 2006 14:35:55 +0600, Egor Pasko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I already have one idea how to benefit from movable vtables.
There would have to be a
2006/11/9, Andrew Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 11/9/06, Nathan Beyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may want to take a quick scan of JIRA for sound items, just to
make sure there aren't any additional patches that haven't been
applied.
Thanks Nathan. Seems only Harmony-1644 [1] is not applied
I'll take a look.
SY, Alexey
2006/11/9, Vladimir Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello committers,
could somebody take care about
*HARMONY-2107*http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2107?
It is trivial to fix issue allows easily identify tests that leads to vm
hang up/crash in the process
I've just finished adding drlvm to the nightly DaCapo benchmark
regression tests. The results are available here:
http://cs/people/Robin.Garner/dacapo/regression/
JikesRVM and DRLVM/Harmony classlib are built from svn checkouts taken
when the nightly run kicks off (00:35 Australian Eastern
Hi Andrew,
I'm working on javax.sound.sampled API now.
I have completed the following classes:
AudioFileFormat, AudioFormat, AudioInputStream, BooleanControl,
CompoundControl, Control, DataLine, EnumControl.
I'll file a JIRA with patch shortly.
Sorry that I didn't notice about this work
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
