Hi Doug,
thanks for joining the discussion.
Doug Lea wrote:
No matter whether you think you are starting with a JVM written in
Java or a micro-kernel-ish one in C (which seem to be the leading
options), you will probably discover that you end up writing most of
it in Java.
I think that a
hi Tom,
Tom Tromey wrote:
Jakob == Jakob Praher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jakob do we want to build something that competes with sun j2se/mono on the
Jakob desktop side (gnome/redhat would be interested in that)
I don't speak for Red Hat, but I can explain a little about why we
ship gcj
hi Geir,
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On May 19, 2005, at 8:18 AM, Jakob Praher wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On May 19, 2005, at 5:24 AM, Jakob Praher wrote:
Both of these are conventional expectations, and we can meet this via
pluggability, right?
If you have for instance completly
hi David,
thanks for pointing that out. I haven't looked into the application but,
some notes from my side.
David Griffiths wrote:
From the llvm web site: LLVM does not currently support garbage
collection of multi-threaded programs or GC-safe points other than
function calls, but these will
I've put some corrections in, so that its more understandable.
Jakob Praher wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On May 19, 2005, at 5:24 AM, Jakob Praher wrote:
I don't understand
Take classpath project. It aims at working accross open vms. So you have
to build a glue layer between what
