Re: [build] status

2006-07-21 Thread Alexey Petrenko
As I said in the accordig JIRA we should use properties from the file or remove that commented properties from the properties file. This properties are misleading people. SY, Alexey 21 Jul 2006 10:53:08 +0700, Egor Pasko [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On the 0x1AC day of Apache Harmony Anton Luht wrote:

Re: [build] status

2006-07-21 Thread Alexei Zakharov
Agree. I was confused when I saw it the first time. Regards, 2006/7/21, Alexey Petrenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]: As I said in the accordig JIRA we should use properties from the file or remove that commented properties from the properties file. This properties are misleading people. SY, Alexey 21

Re: [build] status

2006-07-21 Thread Alexey Petrenko
I've filed JIRA issue: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-943 Please vote for it! :) SY, Alexey 2006/7/21, Alexei Zakharov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Agree. I was confused when I saw it the first time. Regards, 2006/7/21, Alexey Petrenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]: As I said in the accordig JIRA

Re: [build] status

2006-07-21 Thread Alexei Zakharov
Too late to vote, it's already closed. :) Regards, 2006/7/21, Alexey Petrenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I've filed JIRA issue: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-943 Please vote for it! :) SY, Alexey 2006/7/21, Alexei Zakharov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Agree. I was confused when I saw it the

Re: [build] status

2006-07-21 Thread Alexey Petrenko
Yep, Mark is lightning fast! :) 2006/7/21, Alexei Zakharov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Too late to vote, it's already closed. :) Regards, 2006/7/21, Alexey Petrenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I've filed JIRA issue: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-943 Please vote for it! :) SY, Alexey

Re: [build] status

2006-07-20 Thread Vladimir Gorr
The issue mentioned below disapperead after the latest changes for class library. Nevertheless I'm not clear a clue for this build error. In any case thanks for this fix. Vladimir. On 7/19/06, Vladimir Gorr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anybody say about the build status on Windows we have

Re: [build] status

2006-07-20 Thread Mark Hindess
mentioned below disapperead after the latest changes for class library. Nevertheless I'm not clear a clue for this build error. In any case thanks for this fix. Vladimir. On 7/19/06, Vladimir Gorr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anybody say about the build status on Windows we have now

Re: [build] status

2006-07-20 Thread Anton Luht
Hello buildmasters, One note: ant fetch-depends seem not to work behind proxy - it fails after timeout. Adding proxy settings to depends.properties didn't help. The problem solved after I've added setproxy proxyhost=${http.proxyHost} proxyport=${http.proxyPort}/ in the beginning of

[testing] locale dependent tests (was: Re: [build] status)

2006-07-19 Thread Tim Ellison
Richard Liang wrote: Although the spec does not require the round-trip of applyPattern and toPattern, we still want to get one *certain* pattern through toPattern. Now the problem is the returned pattern is locale-dependent. I'm uncertain about the reason to remove the assertion: 1) Because

Re: [build] status

2006-07-19 Thread Vladimir Gorr
Can anybody say about the build status on Windows we have now? Unfortunately, I cannot build for the recent sources due to the following issue: [exec] winFont.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol void __cde l throwNPException(struct JNIEnv_ *,char const *) ( ?throwNPException

[build] status

2006-07-18 Thread Tim Ellison
(1) Linux build/tests are passing again, but for some reason the 'BUILD SUCCESSFUL' note didn't go to the commit list? (2) Windows build/test is still failing with: Wrong full date pattern expected:...full... but was:...long... junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: Wrong full date pattern

Re: [build] status

2006-07-18 Thread Mark Hindess
On 18 July 2006 at 9:21, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (1) Linux build/tests are passing again, but for some reason the 'BUILD SUCCESSFUL' note didn't go to the commit list? Size problems again I think. (Some of the awt natives are built by default now - since they don't rely on the

Re: [build] status

2006-07-18 Thread Richard Liang
Hello Tim, I'm looking at this issue :-) Tim Ellison wrote: (1) Linux build/tests are passing again, but for some reason the 'BUILD SUCCESSFUL' note didn't go to the commit list? (2) Windows build/test is still failing with: Wrong full date pattern expected:...full... but was:...long...

Re: [build] status

2006-07-18 Thread Richard Liang
Richard Liang wrote: Hello Tim, I'm looking at this issue :-) Tim Ellison wrote: (1) Linux build/tests are passing again, but for some reason the 'BUILD SUCCESSFUL' note didn't go to the commit list? (2) Windows build/test is still failing with: Wrong full date pattern

Re: [build] status

2006-07-18 Thread Richard Liang
Hello Tim, I have raised Harmony-910[1] for this issue, patch is also available :-) Would you please have a look at it. Thanks a lot. [1]http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-910 Best regards, Richard Richard Liang wrote: Richard Liang wrote: Hello Tim, I'm looking at this

Re: [build] status

2006-07-18 Thread Tim Ellison
Richard Liang wrote: Hello Tim, I have raised Harmony-910[1] for this issue, patch is also available :-) Would you please have a look at it. Thanks a lot. I've had a look at it, but you don't appear to fix the problem described below... Richard Liang wrote: snip The reason is: In

Re: [build] status

2006-07-18 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
Mark Hindess wrote: On 18 July 2006 at 9:21, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (1) Linux build/tests are passing again, but for some reason the 'BUILD SUCCESSFUL' note didn't go to the commit list? Size problems again I think. (Some of the awt natives are built by default now - since

Re: [build] status

2006-07-18 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
This is nuts. We need to chase down the commit that broke this, and reverse it. We can't have a broken build persisting this long. geir Tim Ellison wrote: (1) Linux build/tests are passing again, but for some reason the 'BUILD SUCCESSFUL' note didn't go to the commit list? (2) Windows

Re: [build] status

2006-07-18 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
Now, on my windows box I got a clean build, no failures hm. Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: This is nuts. We need to chase down the commit that broke this, and reverse it. We can't have a broken build persisting this long. geir Tim Ellison wrote: (1) Linux build/tests are passing

Re: [build] status

2006-07-18 Thread Tim Ellison
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: This is nuts. We need to chase down the commit that broke this, and reverse it. We can't have a broken build persisting this long. It was this change that removed the test from the exclusion list:

Re: [build] status

2006-07-18 Thread Tim Ellison
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: Now, on my windows box I got a clean build, no failures hm. The test works on en_US locale and fails on en_UK. I'm guessing that your machine is set up as en_US. Richard offered a patch that sets the locale to en_US for all MessageFormatTest-s, but I suggested

Re: [build] status

2006-07-18 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
Ok - I reversed this, and the tests are passing. Tim Ellison wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: This is nuts. We need to chase down the commit that broke this, and reverse it. We can't have a broken build persisting this long. It was this change that removed the test from the exclusion list:

Re: [build] status

2006-07-18 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
Tim Ellison wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: Now, on my windows box I got a clean build, no failures hm. The test works on en_US locale and fails on en_UK. I'm guessing that your machine is set up as en_US. I'll play with this, switching to en_UK. Richard offered a patch that

Re: [build] status

2006-07-18 Thread Tim Ellison
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: Ok - I reversed this, and the tests are passing. FYI I saw your update and forced a build -- normally it is scheduled on the hour as necessary. I only mention it in case you wonder about non-building later. I see the success message made it through too, bonus.

Re: [build] status

2006-07-18 Thread Tim Ellison
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: Tim Ellison wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: Now, on my windows box I got a clean build, no failures hm. The test works on en_US locale and fails on en_UK. I'm guessing that your machine is set up as en_US. I'll play with this, switching to en_UK. Richard

Re: [build] status

2006-07-18 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
Tim Ellison wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: Ok - I reversed this, and the tests are passing. FYI I saw your update and forced a build -- normally it is scheduled on the hour as necessary. I only mention it in case you wonder about non-building later. I see the success message made it

Re: [build] status

2006-07-18 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
Tim Ellison wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: Tim Ellison wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: Now, on my windows box I got a clean build, no failures hm. The test works on en_US locale and fails on en_UK. I'm guessing that your machine is set up as en_US. I'll play with this, switching

Re: [build] status

2006-07-18 Thread Paulex Yang
Tim Ellison wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: Now, on my windows box I got a clean build, no failures hm. The test works on en_US locale and fails on en_UK. I'm guessing that your machine is set up as en_US. Richard offered a patch that sets the locale to en_US for all

Re: [build] status

2006-07-18 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
Then I guess we just fix the test. geir Paulex Yang wrote: Tim Ellison wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: Now, on my windows box I got a clean build, no failures hm. The test works on en_US locale and fails on en_UK. I'm guessing that your machine is set up as en_US. Richard

Re: [build] status

2006-07-18 Thread Paulex Yang
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: Then I guess we just fix the test. Agree, just think we should not fix the test by removing the assertion. geir Paulex Yang wrote: Tim Ellison wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: Now, on my windows box I got a clean build, no failures hm.

Re: [build] status

2006-07-18 Thread Richard Liang
Tim Ellison wrote: Richard Liang wrote: Hello Tim, I have raised Harmony-910[1] for this issue, patch is also available :-) Would you please have a look at it. Thanks a lot. I've had a look at it, but you don't appear to fix the problem described below... Ah., Let me

Re: [build] status

2006-07-18 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
What do you suggest then? Paulex Yang wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: Then I guess we just fix the test. Agree, just think we should not fix the test by removing the assertion. geir Paulex Yang wrote: Tim Ellison wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: Now, on my windows

Re: [build] status

2006-07-18 Thread Paulex Yang
I think Richard's patch is fine, i.e., specify a locale to the test, what we want to test is toPattern()'s logic, not the locale data or something, and the specified locale is OK to test the logic. And I also think maybe one locale is not enough, so we may want to include some more exceptional

Re: [build] status

2006-07-18 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
Paulex Yang wrote: I think Richard's patch is fine, i.e., specify a locale to the test, what we want to test is toPattern()'s logic, not the locale data or something, and the specified locale is OK to test the logic. And I also think maybe one locale is not enough, so we may want to include

RE: [build] status

2006-07-18 Thread Nathan Beyer
-Original Message- From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Paulex Yang wrote: I think Richard's patch is fine, i.e., specify a locale to the test, what we want to test is toPattern()'s logic, not the locale data or something, and the specified locale is OK to test the

Re: [build] status

2006-07-18 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
Nathan Beyer wrote: -Original Message- From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Paulex Yang wrote: I think Richard's patch is fine, i.e., specify a locale to the test, what we want to test is toPattern()'s logic, not the locale data or something, and the specified locale

[admin] Build status messages

2006-04-25 Thread Mark Hindess
Can one of the list admins for the -commits list check to see why the new build (and test) status messages are not getting through to the list? The From address will be: Apache Harmony Build [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the subjects will be one of: Subject: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE:

Re: [admin] Build status messages

2006-04-25 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
I got [continuum] BUILD ERROR: Classlib/win.ia32 Build/Test about 38 mins ago w/ Message-ID : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mark Hindess wrote: Can one of the list admins for the -commits list check to see why the new build (and test) status messages are not getting through to the list? The From

Re: [admin] Build status messages

2006-04-25 Thread Tim Ellison
Seems that SVN was unreachable from here for a while. I see it is building now so fingers-crossed for a BUILD SUCCESSFUL message any time soon. Regards, Tim Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: I got [continuum] BUILD ERROR: Classlib/win.ia32 Build/Test about 38 mins ago w/ Message-ID : [EMAIL

RE: [admin] Build status messages

2006-04-25 Thread Magnusson, Geir
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [admin] Build status messages Seems that SVN was unreachable from here for a while. I see it is building now so fingers-crossed for a BUILD SUCCESSFUL message any time soon. Regards, Tim Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: I got [continuum] BUILD

RE: [admin] Build status messages

2006-04-25 Thread Magnusson, Geir
-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [admin] Build status messages From my nag system messages, there was a problem in infra, but things look like they are back together. geir -- Geir Magnusson Jr SSG/MPD [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 203 665 6437 -Original Message- From: Tim

Re: Update on build status

2006-03-19 Thread Stepan Mishura
Hi Mark, On 3/16/06, Mark Hindess wrote: Our local builds now complete a two stage build. First with a certified JDK and then with the eclipse compiler running on the VME and deploy directory from the first stage build. They then run the tests. I'm also generating some reports as part of

Re: Update on build status

2006-03-19 Thread Tim Ellison
Stepan Mishura wrote: I found that some classes from javax.crypto (for example, SecretKey) in the list of required classes for continuum and geronimo. I verified that they are present in the repository. What is wrong with them? They are being built into crypto.jar in the SECURITY module build

Re: Update on build status

2006-03-18 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Mark Hindess wrote: Our local builds now complete a two stage build. First with a certified JDK and then with the eclipse compiler running on the VME and deploy directory from the first stage build. They then run the tests. I'm also generating some reports as part

Re: Update on build status

2006-03-16 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Mark Hindess wrote: Our local builds now complete a two stage build. First with a certified JDK and then with the eclipse compiler running on the VME and deploy directory from the first stage build. They then run the tests. I'm also generating some reports as part of the build. The JAPI

Re: Update on build status

2006-03-16 Thread Stuart Ballard
Mark Hindess mark.hindess at googlemail.com writes: Our local builds now complete a two stage build. First with a certified JDK and then with the eclipse compiler running on the VME and deploy directory from the first stage build. They then run the tests. This seems a good point to jump in

Re: classlib build status emails?

2006-02-27 Thread Tim Ellison
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark Hindess wrote: Hi, Is there any interest in having build status emails sent to this list? I'm building classlib trunk with continuum and it would be simple for me to have messages like the following sent to the list whenever the status of our builds change

Re: classlib build status emails?

2006-02-27 Thread Mark Hindess
On 27/02/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I (ahem) 'tested' the build machine by checking in some code that would not compile, at 16:23 GMT today -- but no complaint sent on the dev list? Thanks Tim. It's about time someone tested it! ;-) The mail logs show the message leaving

Re: classlib build status emails?

2006-02-22 Thread Oliver Deakin
Yup, got to echo Tims words - very cool :) It's great for us to be able to see how near/far we are from a full J2SE implementation, and provides a simple way for people to find areas that need work. Thanks! Stuart Ballard wrote: Stuart Ballard stuart.a.ballard at gmail.com writes: If

Re: classlib build status emails?

2006-02-21 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
Mark Hindess wrote: On 21/02/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark Hindess wrote: Hi, Is there any interest in having build status emails sent to this list? I'm building classlib trunk with continuum and it would be simple for me to have messages like the following sent

Re: classlib build status emails?

2006-02-21 Thread Mark Hindess
On 21/02/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark Hindess wrote: On 21/02/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark Hindess wrote: Hi, Is there any interest in having build status emails sent to this list? I'm building classlib trunk with continuum and it would

Re: classlib build status emails?

2006-02-21 Thread Stuart Ballard
Stuart Ballard stuart.a.ballard at gmail.com writes: If you can give me an url that will always point to the latest jar file(s), I can set up nightly japi results and mail diffs to this list. Geir gave me a pointer to the latest snapshots, so the japi results are now online:

Re: classlib build status emails?

2006-02-21 Thread Tim Ellison
These are very cool -- thanks Stuart. We need to figure out a way that we can run the japitools on a regular basis to track progress. It is also a great way to indicate where people can help round-out a particular package for example. How should I interpret a line whose percentage figures

classlib build status emails?

2006-02-20 Thread Mark Hindess
Hi, Is there any interest in having build status emails sent to this list? I'm building classlib trunk with continuum and it would be simple for me to have messages like the following sent to the list whenever the status of our builds change. Currently I'm building only on linux but I plan

Re: classlib build status emails?

2006-02-20 Thread Tim Ellison
Mark Hindess wrote: Hi, Is there any interest in having build status emails sent to this list? Well we've discussed this privately, but for the record yes! I'd like to see build results posted to the dev list when the build is broken/repaired. I'm building classlib trunk with continuum

Re: classlib build status emails?

2006-02-20 Thread Stuart Ballard
Mark Hindess mark.hindess at googlemail.com writes: Is there any interest in having build status emails sent to this list? I'm building classlib trunk with continuum and it would be simple for me to have messages like the following sent to the list whenever the status of our builds change

Re: classlib build status emails?

2006-02-20 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
Mark Hindess wrote: Hi, Is there any interest in having build status emails sent to this list? I'm building classlib trunk with continuum and it would be simple for me to have messages like the following sent to the list whenever the status of our builds change. Currently I'm building only

Re: classlib build status emails?

2006-02-20 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
Stuart Ballard wrote: Mark Hindess mark.hindess at googlemail.com writes: Is there any interest in having build status emails sent to this list? I'm building classlib trunk with continuum and it would be simple for me to have messages like the following sent to the list whenever the status

Re: classlib build status emails?

2006-02-20 Thread Mark Hindess
On 21/02/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark Hindess wrote: Hi, Is there any interest in having build status emails sent to this list? I'm building classlib trunk with continuum and it would be simple for me to have messages like the following sent to the list