On Sep 23, 2006, at 12:00 AM, Nathan Beyer wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Shimansky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 7:43 PM
On Saturday 23 September 2006 04:20 Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Hm.
LogManger's initializer does
Logger root =
Now I'm seeing it :)
On Sep 22, 2006, at 5:29 PM, Nikolay Kuznetsov wrote:
Ok then, it was suse 9, ia32.
On 9/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what platform? I'm not seeing that...
On Sep 22, 2006, at 4:01 PM, Nikolay Kuznetsov wrote:
core dumps in debug and prints
PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 5:48 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [drlvm] getting activeMQ to run
On Sep 23, 2006, at 12:00 AM, Nathan Beyer wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Shimansky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September
mechanism won't work correctly.
I'm
fixing that on.
-Nathan
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 5:48 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [drlvm] getting activeMQ to run
On Sep 23, 2006, at 12:00 AM
]
Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 5:48 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [drlvm] getting activeMQ to run
On Sep 23, 2006, at 12:00 AM, Nathan Beyer wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Shimansky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [drlvm] getting activeMQ to run
On Sep 23, 2006, at 12:00 AM, Nathan Beyer wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Shimansky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 7:43 PM
On Saturday 23 September 2006 04:20 Geir Magnusson Jr
-
From: Nathan Beyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 2:38 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [drlvm] getting activeMQ to run
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just gave it a quick look. Given
On Sep 23, 2006, at 3:58 PM, Nathan Beyer wrote:
[1] file:///C:/install/jdk/5.0/docs/api/java/util/logging/
Logger.html#global
/me tries to mount a c-drive on my mac... :)
geir
-
Terms of use :
] getting activeMQ to run
On Sep 23, 2006, at 3:58 PM, Nathan Beyer wrote:
[1] file:///C:/install/jdk/5.0/docs/api/java/util/logging/
Logger.html#global
/me tries to mount a c-drive on my mac... :)
geir
-
Terms
Getting back to original topic.
I have managed to get following message on activemq-4.0.2 in release
build of drlvm:
ica-50215-1159047303002-1:0) started
Is that it? What is the exact scenario to try with activemq?
--
Ivan
On 9/24/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 23,
On Sep 23, 2006, at 5:39 PM, Ivan Volosyuk wrote:
Getting back to original topic.
I have managed to get following message on activemq-4.0.2 in release
build of drlvm:
ica-50215-1159047303002-1:0) started
Is that it? What is the exact scenario to try with activemq?
release runs - I as able
Hello,
I was able to run ActiveQM on Linux with patch attached. Looks like
something is broken in logger static initialization sequence. Though
this patch helpps in running ActiveQM, I would treat this patch as
workaround, this issue requires some more analysis and testing.
Nik.
On 9/22/06,
First, thanks so much for the fast response and good solution.
I don't see any problem with this patch, but you're right - I don't
understand why we have it, since Logger should set it's global
field to getLogger(global) in the static initialization.
I have the same problem with J9, so I
On Sep 22, 2006, at 3:17 PM, Nikolay Kuznetsov wrote:
Looks like there are still some problems...
Frankly I was debugging this issue with J9 too, J9 works fine now,
while drlvm
core dumps in debug and prints something like this in release:
WARN DefaultJDBCAdapter - Could not
Why does this even run?
Logger.global is a public final static... How can it be set like this?
geir
On Sep 22, 2006, at 1:51 PM, Nikolay Kuznetsov wrote:
Hello,
I was able to run ActiveQM on Linux with patch attached. Looks like
something is broken in logger static initialization sequence.
ignore this question please... I was multi-tasking on a conference
call...
geir
On Sep 22, 2006, at 3:52 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Why does this even run?
Logger.global is a public final static... How can it be set like
this?
geir
On Sep 22, 2006, at 1:51 PM, Nikolay Kuznetsov
core dumps in debug and prints something like this in release:
WARN DefaultJDBCAdapter - Could not create JDBC tables;
they could already exist. Failure was:
That might be simply because you created the tables needed when you
ran the first time?
I don't know for sure, but
what platform? I'm not seeing that...
On Sep 22, 2006, at 4:01 PM, Nikolay Kuznetsov wrote:
core dumps in debug and prints something like this in release:
WARN DefaultJDBCAdapter - Could not create JDBC
tables;
they could already exist. Failure was:
That might be
Ok then, it was suse 9, ia32.
On 9/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what platform? I'm not seeing that...
On Sep 22, 2006, at 4:01 PM, Nikolay Kuznetsov wrote:
core dumps in debug and prints something like this in release:
WARN DefaultJDBCAdapter - Could
On Friday 22 September 2006 22:39 Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
First, thanks so much for the fast response and good solution.
I don't see any problem with this patch, but you're right - I don't
understand why we have it, since Logger should set it's global
field to getLogger(global) in the
On Sep 22, 2006, at 7:32 PM, Gregory Shimansky wrote:
On Friday 22 September 2006 22:39 Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
First, thanks so much for the fast response and good solution.
I don't see any problem with this patch, but you're right - I don't
understand why we have it, since Logger should
On Saturday 23 September 2006 04:20 Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Sep 22, 2006, at 7:32 PM, Gregory Shimansky wrote:
On Friday 22 September 2006 22:39 Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
First, thanks so much for the fast response and good solution.
I don't see any problem with this patch, but
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Shimansky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 7:43 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [drlvm] getting activeMQ to run
On Saturday 23 September 2006 04:20 Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Sep 22, 2006, at 7:32
Even though we have the jar issue fixed w/t he launcher-based build,
I still can't run ActiveMQ using release build on Ubuntu.
Can anyone else report success? Or a patch? :)
geir
-
Terms of use :
On 9/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even though we have the jar issue fixed w/t he launcher-based build,
I still can't run ActiveMQ using release build on Ubuntu.
Can anyone else report success? Or a patch? :)
I was succesfull on Windows. No success exist for Linux
On Sep 22, 2006, at 12:47 AM, Vladimir Gorr wrote:
On 9/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 22, 2006, at 12:37 AM, Vladimir Gorr wrote:
On 9/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even though we have the jar issue fixed w/t he launcher-based
build,
26 matches
Mail list logo
