Re: NDA issues and acceptable use of sun source (was: Re: JavaSound Was: java.sql.*)

2006-02-15 Thread Dalibor Topic
Leo Simons mail at leosimons.com writes: Since the JDK stuff is now all mostly out in the public, and most NDAs are effectively voided once the information they are meant to protect is available through other means not involving an NDA. Missing the cue by just a few days, Sun Microsystems

NDA issues and acceptable use of sun source (was: Re: JavaSound Was: java.sql.*)

2006-02-12 Thread Leo Simons
Vorbis is cool :-) Thanks for thinking this stuff through and being careful about protecting everyone and yourself from legal mess. IANAL. Not Legal Advice. On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 12:08:20AM +0100, Tor-Einar Jarnbjo wrote: Which code, and what were the terms of the NDA? The CLA is fairly

Re: NDA issues and acceptable use of sun source (was: Re: JavaSound Was: java.sql.*)

2006-02-12 Thread Dalibor Topic
Leo Simons mail at leosimons.com writes: If you put a notice to that effect onto your authorized contributor form that should probably be fine. If you can't remember what bit of the implementation you looked at, chances are you also don't remember what you saw! People have been successfully