On 11/9/06, Ivanov, Alexey A wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Beyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 5:49 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Japi diffs for harmony
No problem on the name change, but doesn't what Stuart is talking
about
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Beyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 5:49 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Japi diffs for harmony
No problem on the name change, but doesn't what Stuart is talking
about require that methods add
Nathan Beyer wrote:
No problem on the name change, but doesn't what Stuart is talking
about require that methods add this exception to the signature to
actually show up in the reports?
That's correct. If it's a subclass of RuntimeException (which it ought
to be, otherwise it'd have to be in
Stuart Ballard wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
I'm no fan of stubs for just such reason. But for those dev's that are
following along, there is an
org.apache.harmony.luni.util.NotYetImplementedException that is defined
for just such purposes.
Would you consider renaming this to
No problem on the name change, but doesn't what Stuart is talking
about require that methods add this exception to the signature to
actually show up in the reports?
On 11/8/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stuart Ballard wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
I'm no fan of stubs for just such
Stuart Ballard wrote:
Wow, I'm impressed that harmony is 94.66 against 1.5. That's
incredibly good progress - especially if all of that is actual
functional implementations rather than stubbed out methods. (If you
have stubbed out methods by the way, I suggest defining a
RuntimeException
Tim Ellison wrote:
I'm no fan of stubs for just such reason. But for those dev's that are
following along, there is an
org.apache.harmony.luni.util.NotYetImplementedException that is defined
for just such purposes.
Would you consider renaming this to NotImplementedException since Japi
, 2006 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: Japi diffs for harmony
To: Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
(this will probably bounce from harmony-dev, I'm not subscribed; feel
free to forward it)
On 11/3/06, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stuart,
I'm a *huge
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Ah, also, would it be possible to have a list of the percentage over
time? It would be very interesting to plot the evolution of coverage
over time.
Here's the basic data from the build we've been doing since July.
I wonder if you can do a neat dump of the harmony svn archive in a
lump for local processing. This is one interesting difference between
CVS and SVN - you can always take a copy of the CVS data just for the
files you care about. I don't know enough about SVN to know if you can
get the
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Ah, also, would it be possible to have a list of the percentage over
time? It would be very interesting to plot the evolution of coverage
over time.
Here's the basic data from the build we've been doing since July.
http://people.apache.org/~tellison/build.csv
If
org.omg packages looks much better after applying latest Yoko.
javax.rmi looks much better too! :)
http://www.kaffe.org/~stuart/japi/htmlout/h-jdk15-harmony.html
Thanks, Stuart, for these regular comparison updates!
SY, Alexey
2006/9/28, Stuart Ballard [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Japi diff jdk12 vs
Stuart,
Any chance that we can get a link to Harmony results on the
http://www.kaffe.org/~stuart/japi/ page, to show people who come via
your tool?
Thanks!
Tim
Stuart Ballard wrote:
Japi diff jdk11 vs harmony:
Full results:
http://www.kaffe.org/~stuart/japi/htmlout/h-jdk11-harmony.html
13 matches
Mail list logo
