+1
Thank you,
Nadya Morozova
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Egor Pasko
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 11:23 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen
documentation?
On the 0x216 day
On 11/7/06, Morozova, Nadezhda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
For in much wisdom is much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge
increaseth sorrow
I'm also +1 to document all of our sources. But it's not always possible to
write a meaningful comment without a lot of TODO, this is a workaround,
: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen
documentation?
On the 0x21A day of Apache Harmony Mikhail Fursov wrote:
On 11/7/06, Morozova, Nadezhda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
For in much wisdom is much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge
increaseth sorrow
I'm also +1 to document
opinion.
Thank you,
Nadya Morozova
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Egor Pasko
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 12:18 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen
documentation?
On the 0x216 day
With best regards,
Alexei Fedotov,
Intel Java XML Engineering
-Original Message-
From: Morozova, Nadezhda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 6:26 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen
documentation?
Egor,
I
at this stage:)
Thank you,
Nadya Morozova
-Original Message-
From: Fedotov, Alexei A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 7:36 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen
documentation?
Nadya wrote,
we could check
