+1
This is a great news!
On 21/10/06, Weldon Washburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 10/20/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're trying something a little different. I think Roy Fielding one
said something along the lines of when a community gets organized
enough to
+1
--
Alexey A. Ivanov
Intel Middleware Product Division
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 11:30 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [vote] Graduate Apache Harmony podling from the Incubator
We're trying
Hi
I've developed two "impossible tests, which shows "fake" circularity errors. One test is more simple and use SecurityManager. The other is a bit more complex and usescustom ClassLoader. You can findthem in attachment.
Thanks.
Pavel Afremov
On 10/17/06, Pavel Pervov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Dan Lydick
[Original Message]
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date: 10/20/06 2:30:42 PM
Subject: [vote] Graduate Apache Harmony podling from the Incubator
We're trying something a little different. I think Roy Fielding one
said
All,
Just a few minutes ago I sent a mail titled, [DRLVM][MMTk] current status
and plan. It is way too long and detailed to include in this list of drlvm
enhancements. Below is a summary that hopefully is at the appropriate level
of detail. Please refer to the above email for more information.
+1
+ 1. ;-)
Best regards,
Richard
On 10/21/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're trying something a little different. I think Roy Fielding one
said something along the lines of when a community gets organized
enough to vote itself out of the Incubator, it's appropriate.
So to
I am trying to become more familiar with the jit code. I ran the
following to see what all was compiled when running Hello World.
java -Xtrace:compile Hello. I was very surprised to see the number of
methods that seem to be loaded. I think there are about 1079 methods
that get compiled for
Congratulations! Great news!
Sorry for being a bit outdated - I was on vacations last week.
On 10/18/06, Nathan Beyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations to all the new committers.
-N
On 10/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please join the Apache Harmony PPMC in
+1
Thank you,
Nadya Morozova
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 11:30 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [vote] Graduate Apache Harmony podling from the Incubator
We're trying something a little
On 10/20/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[X] +1 Graduate Apache Harmony from incubation, and let it petition the
board for Top Level Project status
the community still has things to learn about the release process (see
-Original Message-
From: Alex Blewitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 3:32 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: RE: Thoughtless fixes considered harmful Was: [OT]
Automated
fixes considered harmful
On 21/10/06, Fedotov, Alexei A [EMAIL PROTECTED]
467 Tests Run
94% Pass (443 tests passed)
6% Fail (24 tests failed)
5 Suites skipped
The main progress focuses here:
1. Harmony classlib fails to load class when user-defined security policy
exists. It is due to the sequence of library loading of VM, which has been
resolved now.
2. A new
This can be controlled a bit more. An svn:externals link can point to
a specific revision, not just a SVN URL. This way the working copy
download has to be changed at the point of link.
-Nathan
On 10/21/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great - I wanted to make sure. I was
+1
On 10/20/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're trying something a little different. I think Roy Fielding one
said something along the lines of when a community gets organized
enough to vote itself out of the Incubator, it's appropriate.
So to bring the Harmony
+1
On 10/22/06, Weldon Washburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 10/20/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're trying something a little different. I think Roy Fielding one
said something along the lines of when a community gets organized
enough to vote itself out of the
+1
On 21/10/06, Weldon Washburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 10/20/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're trying something a little different. I think Roy Fielding one
said something along the lines of when a community gets organized
enough to vote itself out of the
Actually it would be easy to inspect the unresolvable
reference name, and if it were in ${.*} format
(meaning it is an unexpanded property reference) issue
a warning... I'll think on that. ;)
-Matt
--- Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/10/06, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Alex,
I believe only committers can close an issue. Once an issue is
resolved, I usually leave a comment and ask the reporter to verify it
and then when that happens I close it. It's not uncommon that
verification just gets missed, so I just come back and close anything
that has been resolved for
It seems JIRA is down for maintenance. If HARMONY-1904 is still open
perhaps it makes sense to put a counter in the while (...) { select...}
loop. And after every N loops, print a warning/diagnostic message. The
value for N would have to be tuned. I don't know what the best number would
be.
I haven't had a chance to look at the issue (JIRAs down right now,
probably part of the infrastructure move), but have you tried
comparing the actual class files of the problematic class or classes.
I'd suggest compiling the files using ECJ, save them off, compile with
Sun/BEA/etc, save them off
+1 from me
let's make things better
On 10/21/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're trying something a little different. I think Roy Fielding one
said something along the lines of when a community gets organized
enough to vote itself out of the Incubator, it's appropriate.
Hi.
On First question I think that alternative 1 is better. It's allow to avoid
creating of special or magic registration subsystem which should
provide addresses for magic native call.
On the Second question I agree with Pavel P. Null should be OK.
On Third question, I think no
I think Harmony does the right thing as spec requires, the difference is
caused by underlying system call, so it should be acceptable, i.e., the
test needs to be rewritten or excluded.
+1 from me
Thanks,
2006/10/20, Paulex Yang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Denis Kishenko wrote:
I have researched
Current status
- Robin Garner's mmtk_20061016.zip snapshot of MMTk source now runs
the simple user-level MarkSweep.java test on DLRVM svn HEAD of
10/20/2006. The mods to MMTk porting layer to support the above have
been committed to DRLVM HEAD. The next steps for the MMTk/DRLVM port are
Maksim,
Am I right, that at the place you need to retrieve field from a class, you
have both field's name AND descriptor?
If so, you should move definion of FIeld*
class_lookup_field_recursive(Class*, const char*, const char*) from
vmcore/include/Class.h to include/jit_intf.h and change its
Hello,
This morning I have been trying to build Harmony and I'm having a problem
with the fetch-depends part of the build script. I am getting the following
output:
Buildfile: *C:\eclipse32harmony\eclipse\workspace\Harmony\build.xml
fetch-depends*:
*
-download*:
[*echo*] Checking
+1
Pavel Afremov.
On 10/21/06, Weldon Washburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 10/20/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're trying something a little different. I think Roy Fielding one
said something along the lines of when a community gets organized
enough to vote
On 10/21/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're trying something a little different. I think Roy Fielding one
said something along the lines of when a community gets organized
enough to vote itself out of the Incubator, it's appropriate.
So to bring the Harmony community and the
Have you tested it on windows, for example, signing in as admin, and the
file which is set read only is still writable?:)
It is always good to follow RI or else we might encounter odd problems in
real applications.
Furthermore, root is the concept of OS, so I do not think the role should
be
Mikhail,
can relative path be specified in -Dvm.gc_dll/-Dvm.em_dll? If so, the path
should be extended to represent full path.
Regards,
On 10/21/06, Mikhail Fursov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/21/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the reason I've corrected the code.
Hi Gerald,
Boris and I resolved the problem. This was an incorrect Certificate
Verify message sent to the server peer during mutual authentication.
Please try the attached patch and tell us how it works. If it is OK
for you I will attach it to the JIRA report you created (when the
server will
+1 from me. Our community seems to be very active and healthful.
Best regards,
2006/10/20, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We're trying something a little different. I think Roy Fielding one
said something along the lines of when a community gets organized
enough to vote itself out of
What is the goal here?
1. If the goal is to create a single thread library that can be used
by multiple VM and classlib implementations, then the unified thread
lib should contain everything needed to support a VM implementation.
2. If the goal is to simply define the interface between the
Welcome Armand!
My comments are inlined.
On 10/23/06, Armand Navabi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to become more familiar with the jit code. I ran the
following to see what all was compiled when running Hello World.
java -Xtrace:compile Hello. I was very surprised to see the number of
Pavel, I see no attachment.. ?
On 10/23/06, Pavel Afremov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I've developed two impossible tests, which shows fake circularity
errors. One test is more simple and use SecurityManager. The other is a bit
more complex and uses custom ClassLoader. You can find them in
Pavel,
I've found only one problem in your design.
Why do we need 1) if every component must have 2)
E.g. why not to implement get_address(int) method in C language too? AFAIU
Pavel Afremov's design has no C-interface methods at all.
--
Mikhail Fursov
Mikhail,
What i've meant is that we should account for all interchangeable components
which can/want/should provide fast-path helpers.
Pavel.
On 10/21/06, Mikhail Fursov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pavel, I'm sorry I do not understand what the replacement do you mean?
I said that only about a
--- Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[SNIP]
First, there are minor 'nits' here and there related
to license and
license headers. For example, we're missing the
antlr license in our
NOTICE file.
wrt this particular nit, antlr 2.x.x versions are
public domain... text:
---
ANTLR
that's not a bad idea...
Nathan Beyer wrote:
This can be controlled a bit more. An svn:externals link can point to
a specific revision, not just a SVN URL. This way the working copy
download has to be changed at the point of link.
-Nathan
On 10/21/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 10/23/06, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[SNIP]
First, there are minor 'nits' here and there related
to license and
license headers. For example, we're missing the
antlr license in our
NOTICE file.
wrt this particular nit, antlr
--- robert burrell donkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/23/06, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[SNIP]
wrt this particular nit, antlr 2.x.x versions
are
public domain...
the public domain has become difficult in recent
times. in
-- Forwarded message --
From: Weldon Washburn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Oct 23, 2006 9:07 AM
Subject: [DRLVM][MMTk] current status and plan
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Current status
- Robin Garner's mmtk_20061016.zip snapshot of MMTk source now runs
the simple
Lets stuff the whole thing in there...
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 10/23/06, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[SNIP]
First, there are minor 'nits' here and there related
to license and
license headers. For example, we're missing the
On Monday 23 October 2006 22:05 Mikhail Fursov wrote:
Pavel, I see no attachment.. ?
I think Geir has commented on this once. Apache mail list filters some types
of attachments away (IIRC to keep all intellectual property clean from code
taken from unknown code sources). To make some files
On Monday 23 October 2006 20:21 Weldon Washburn wrote:
All,
Just a few minutes ago I sent a mail titled, [DRLVM][MMTk] current status
and plan. It is way too long and detailed to include in this list of
drlvm enhancements. Below is a summary that hopefully is at the
appropriate level of
On Monday 23 October 2006 14:15 Pavel Pervov wrote:
Mikhail,
can relative path be specified in -Dvm.gc_dll/-Dvm.em_dll? If so, the path
should be extended to represent full path.
So it should be something like
class GCv5Magics {
static {
String gcPath =
Hello, All,
Paulex wrote,
the test needs to be rewritten or excluded
+1, and the option to exclude the test is pretty understandable.
I wonder about the first option. Is there any way to check that symbolic
name corresponds to the local computer? I can imagine the following
condition to check
+1 from me !
thanks,
Pavel
On 10/21/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're trying something a little different. I think Roy Fielding one
said something along the lines of when a community gets organized
enough to vote itself out of the Incubator, it's appropriate.
So to
On Sunday 22 October 2006 01:08 Nathan Beyer wrote:
I haven't had a chance to look at the issue (JIRAs down right now,
probably part of the infrastructure move), but have you tried
comparing the actual class files of the problematic class or classes.
I'd suggest compiling the files using ECJ,
Yeah,
harmony is sorta fun. has more than 640 subscribers on the dev list!
that's a lot for a podling.
That is double of that what we have at myfaces!
so let's move forward here!
-M
On 10/20/06, Fedotov, Alexei A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
As far as I understand the main goal of incubation
Hi Folks,
Sorry for the delay.
[ +1] Graduate Apache Harmony from incubation, and let it petition the
board for Top Level Project status
-- dims
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers)
By inner class you mean an automatic/local class in this case; a
class declared inside a method. It would seem appropriate that a local
class is declared private. Only the method that contains the class
declaration can see it.
Do you disagree with what ECJ is generating?
-Nathan
On 10/23/06,
congratulations!
On 10/23/06, Leo Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
467 Tests Run
94% Pass (443 tests passed)
6% Fail (24 tests failed)
5 Suites skipped
The main progress focuses here:
1. Harmony classlib fails to load class when user-defined security policy
exists. It is due to the sequence of
+1 certainly.
Pavel Pervov,
Enterprise Solutions Software Division.
On 10/20/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're trying something a little different. I think Roy Fielding one
said something along the lines of when a community gets organized
enough to vote itself out of the
Leo Li 写道:
467 Tests Run
94% Pass (443 tests passed)
6% Fail (24 tests failed)
5 Suites skipped
The main progress focuses here:
1. Harmony classlib fails to load class when user-defined security policy
exists. It is due to the sequence of library loading of VM, which has
been
resolved now.
2.
On 10/20/06, Fedotov, Alexei A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Denis,
Can we consider a patch from
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-73 as a fourth option?
Simply speaking, the patch adds a conditional operator which forces API
to returning localhost in this case.
No. I think Harmony
I think we have several different items/questions to discuss:
1) Is it legal to generate private modifier to a local class?
The Java Language Specification, Third Edition part 14.3 states
snip
It is a compile-time error if a local class declaration contains any
one of the following access
On 10/23/06, Evgueni Brevnov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we have several different items/questions to discuss:
1) Is it legal to generate private modifier to a local class?
The Java Language Specification, Third Edition part 14.3 states
snip
It is a compile-time error if a local class
On 10/24/06, Evgueni Brevnov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we have several different items/questions to discuss:
1) Is it legal to generate private modifier to a local class?
The Java Language Specification, Third Edition part 14.3 states
snip
It is a compile-time error if a local class
60 matches
Mail list logo
