Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also, GHCi retains CAFs in the same way as Hugs, the difference is
that GHCi can be configured to throw away the results after
evaluation (:set +r).
If I set this flag, does GHCi discard CAFs during evaluation or at the
end of evaluation? Or, to put it
Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also, GHCi retains CAFs in the same way as Hugs, the difference is
that GHCi can be configured to throw away the results after
evaluation (:set +r).
If I set this flag, does GHCi discard CAFs during evaluation or at the
end of evaluation? Or, to
PADL'03: Second Call for Participation
o PADL Registration Deadline is fast approaching (Dec 20th).
Please register electronically asap.
o Please also note that the special conference rate for the hotel
is available only until Dec. 23rd.
o Highlights
==
1st International Workshop on
Security Issues in Coordination Models, Languages and Systems
(SecCo 2003)
June 28-29, 2003, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
Hi all,
With Foo in the file c.out and the module
\begin{code}
module Main (main) where
import IO (openFile, hGetContents, hClose, IOMode(ReadMode))
import System (getArgs)
import Monad (when)
main :: IO ()
main = do [x] - getArgs
let you_want_it_to_work = read x
cout -
With Foo in the file c.out and the module
\begin{code}
module Main (main) where
import IO (openFile, hGetContents, hClose, IOMode(ReadMode))
import System (getArgs)
import Monad (when)
main :: IO ()
main = do [x] - getArgs
let you_want_it_to_work = read x
cout -
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 02:51:48PM -, Simon Marlow wrote:
in fact, any prefix of Foo, including the empty string, would be
correct. See section 21.2.2 in the (revised) Haskell 98 report.
Aha, thanks. I've kludged around it with
last (' ':s) `seq` hClose cout
Ian
I got this on the Types Forum, but thought people here might find it of
interest, too.
[- The Types Forum, http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/types -]
Dear colleagues: We would like to advertise the following
symposium, and are pleased to invite you to participate. We
apologize if you
Mark Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 17 Dec 2002, Ketil Z. Malde wrote:
Ah - I was never sure what to make of that - I normally just use the GHC
online Haddockised stuff which tells me no more than the type signatures,
but I suppose split must be more than (\x-(x,x))!
Well, as SPJ
I am also not quite sure of your motivation!
The current version of GpH is (or can be with very little difficulty) implemented using
library calls. There is really no language extension per se, rather there are
calls to tightly-coupled C code, plus a set of high level libraries to provide
10 matches
Mail list logo
