NB: the way GHC handles packages is changing significantly (for the
better) in the HEAD.
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:glasgow-haskell-bugs-
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gregory Wright
| Sent: 01 December 2004 19:07
| To: Axel Simon
| Cc: Donald Bruce Stewart;
Hi Axel,
We are in violent agreement :-)
Greg
On Dec 2, 2004, at 4:05 AM, Axel Simon wrote:
Gregory,
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 19:07, Gregory Wright wrote:
No, I patched the hsshellscript library distribution to build using
-package-name hsshellscript
as you mentioned. I still got the error.
I've installed GHC on a Sparc machine, but when I run ghci, I get the
following error message:
ld.so.1: /net/snowy/danvk/ghc-6.2.1/lib/sparc-sun-solaris2/ghc-6.2.1:
fatal: libreadline.so.4: open failed: No such file or directory
The binary package I downloaded from www.haskell.org/ghc warned
On 02 December 2004 09:06, Axel Simon wrote:
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 19:07, Gregory Wright wrote:
No, I patched the hsshellscript library distribution to build using
-package-name hsshellscript
as you mentioned. I still got the error. (The documentation
asserts that -package-name is a
On 02 December 2004 01:45, Dan Vanderkam wrote:
I've installed GHC on a Sparc machine, but when I run ghci, I get the
following error message:
ld.so.1: /net/snowy/danvk/ghc-6.2.1/lib/sparc-sun-solaris2/ghc-6.2.1:
fatal: libreadline.so.4: open failed: No such file or directory
The binary
Bugs item #1068519, was opened at 2004-11-18 08:45
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by simonpj
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=108032aid=1068519group_id=8032
Category: Template Haskell
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
The Report explicitly specifies that you can export a class method naked, for
exactly the reason you give. So I think GHC is right here.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Meacham
| Sent: 02 December 2004 01:28
| To: [EMAIL
Hi,
I refer to Section 5.3 (title see subject line) in
Type classes: exploring the design space
by Simon Peyton Jones, Mark P. Jones and Erik Meijer
HW 1997.
There it is argued very briefly that a type system
with controlled scope of instances risks coherence.
Likewise, in Wadler's and Blotts
FOAL: Foundations of Aspect-Oriented Languages
A one day workshop affiliated with AOSD 2005 in Chicago, USA, on Monday,
14 March 2005.
Themes and Goals
FOAL is a forum for research in foundations of aspect-oriented
programming languages. Areas of interest include but are not
MissingH 0.7.0 is now available from http://quux.org/devel/missingh
MissingH is a collection of Haskell-related utilities, all written in
pure Haskell with an eye towards portability.
The major new feature in this version is the ConfigParser module, which
is a clean implementation of the Python
Hello everyone,
I'm trying to build hmake on version 10.3.6 of Mac OS, having
installed the ghc 6.2.2 dmg I found on haskell.org, but I'm
encountering the following problem:
Steven-Elkins-Computer:~/haskell/hmake-3.09 sge$ make
cd src/hmake; make HC=ghc all config
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 09:08:21AM +, Keean Schupke wrote:
Ben Rudiak-Gould wrote:
Just a small comment on the Wiki page... it says
Several real-life examples of pure haskell code which needs fast global
variables to either be implemented efficiently or statically guarantee
their
Steven Elkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm trying to build hmake on version 10.3.6 of Mac OS,
GHCSYM=#pragma GCC set_debug_pwd /Users/sge/haskell/hmake-3.09
602
Thanks for the bug report - another MacOS user has already reported
it and supplied a patch (attached). Apparently Apple's
Hi John,
I am not objecting to the top-level TWIs anymore - since I realised
contexts can be
provided by wrapping the MVar or IORef modules. I just thought the wiki
misrepresented
the calims of your examples (or maybe the claims are a little
exaggerated)...
As far as I can tell adding top
Nice summary.
What I think is missing is an explanation of when you would want this
feature (and when you wouldn't, more importantly). Here is the kind of
platonic dialogue that summarises my limited understanding:
[..dialogue snipped..]
This is good, and is the sort of thing that should
Hi Steve,
I see that Malcolm Wallace has already answered your question,
but you might be interested in some of the other haskell tools
for OS X supported under darwinports. See
http://darwinports.opendarwin.org
hmake is supported, as well as a the new haskell-mode for emacs
and a bunch of other
With regards to the following...
There are cases in which this parameterization costs convenience and
gains nothing -- for example, the standard library function (randomIO ::
Random a = IO a) cannot be implemented in Haskell without the
unsafePerformIO hack, yet there's nothing semantically
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 10:53:57AM +, Keean Schupke wrote:
Hi John,
I am not objecting to the top-level TWIs anymore - since I realised
contexts can be
provided by wrapping the MVar or IORef modules. I just thought the wiki
misrepresented
the calims of your examples (or maybe the
Just a few minor nitpicks... mainly about the necessity of using certain
APIs,
however I think we are in general agreement...
Keean.
John Meacham wrote:
That example solves a different problem, I was never claiming that
there wern't efficient ways to solve the unique producer problem in
Keean Schupke wrote:
Ben Rudiak-Gould wrote:
[...]
Just a small comment on the Wiki page... it says
Several real-life examples of pure haskell code which needs fast global
variables to either be implemented efficiently or statically guarantee
their invariants are given in
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
| I also have a very small start on a haskell for hackers (hackers
in
| the non-evil sense) sort of document. One this doesn't ignore I/O as
| hard or unimportant. I/O in Haskell doesn't suck. It's just that
a
| lot of people in the community don't have it as a high
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 10:38:16 +, Malcolm Wallace
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the bug report - another MacOS user has already reported
it and supplied a patch (attached).
Many thanks, the patch did the trick.
Steve
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing
Thanks for reminding me of DarwinPorts. I've been meaning to look at
it. The haskell tools are more complete than Fink's. I didn't see
the new Emacs mode you mentioned when I looked earlier today (and now
I'm getting Parse error: parse error in
I think you may be asking the wrong question.
As one of the rank and file and fairly new to Haskell (less then a
month) I can tell you that there is a growing awareness of functional
programming and that it offers different paradigms to work with.
I think the more important question is - is
On 3 Dec 2004, at 03:48, Jason Bailey wrote:
As one of the rank and file and fairly new to Haskell (less then a
month) I can tell you that there is a growing awareness of functional
programming and that it offers different paradigms to work with.
That's good to hear.
The documentation is sparse
25 matches
Mail list logo
