This is beginning to annoy people. Actually, someone registered several
thousand accounts (of the form XX), though almost all of them
have not been used. The others have been used to add spam.
I can block user accounts and IP addresses, and I can grant this
privilege to others on
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 12:10:10 +0100, Ashley Yakeley ash...@semantic.org
wrote:
This is beginning to annoy people. Actually, someone registered several
thousand accounts (of the form XX), though almost all of them
have not been used. The others have been used to add spam.
I can
Hello ,
http://blogs.msdn.com/dsyme/archive/2008/12/10/fsharp-to-ship-as-part-of-visual-studio-2010.aspx
now we can say definitely that 201x decade will be years of FP
replacing OOP in programmers' minds
--
Best regards,
Bulat mailto:bulat.zigans...@gmail.com
---
Haskell Weekly News
http://sequence.complete.org/hwn/20081213
Issue 97 - December 13, 2008
---
Welcome to issue 97 of HWN, a newsletter covering
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 03:42:35PM +0300, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello ,
http://blogs.msdn.com/dsyme/archive/2008/12/10/fsharp-to-ship-as-part-of-visual-studio-2010.aspx
now we can say definitely that 201x decade will be years of FP
replacing OOP in programmers' minds
hehe :-) funny. do
ashley:
This is beginning to annoy people. Actually, someone registered several
thousand accounts (of the form XX), though almost all of them
have not been used. The others have been used to add spam.
I can block user accounts and IP addresses, and I can grant this
privilege to
circularfunc:
I suggest Haskell introduce some syntactic sugar for Maps.
Python uses {this: 2, is: 1, a: 1, Map: 1}
Clojure also use braces: {:k1 1 :k2 3} where whitespace is comma but
commas are also allowed.
I find the import Data.Map and then fromList [(hello,1), (there,
2)]
Hi all,
The Haskell syntax script for vim mentions this mailing list as the
maintainer. Perhaps one of you could fix this bug.
Comments on the same line as import declarations don't get highlighted:
import A -- This comment isn't highlighted
import B {- Neither is this -}
import C {- and
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Ori Avtalion o...@avtalion.name wrote:
Comments on the same line as import declarations don't get highlighted:
import A -- This comment isn't highlighted
import B {- Neither is this -}
import C {- and
this -}
I think the way vim tries to do syntax
Today yet another newbie in #haskell asked about a 'split' function
for lists, and I got fed up with saying 'no one can agree on the right
interface so it doesn't exist, just write it yourself', because it's a
really dumb answer, even if it's true.
Instead of trying to get a 'split' function
A very nice initiative I must say; although the page should contain
the usual explanation for why such a split method can't be universal.
That is, add the same explanation you give every time; but to the
page.
/Gianfranco
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Brent Yorgey byor...@seas.upenn.edu
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 05:39:55PM +0100, Gianfranco Alongi wrote:
A very nice initiative I must say; although the page should contain
the usual explanation for why such a split method can't be universal.
That is, add the same explanation you give every time; but to the
page.
Good idea; I've
I have actually been thinking about a similar thing, but on the group subject.
One can actually group things in many ways, such as groupBy (==) , so
that groupBy (==) [1,2,1,2] should give
[[1,1],[2,2]]. Of course other ideas are possible.
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Brent Yorgey
---
Haskell Weekly News
http://sequence.complete.org/hwn/20081213
Issue 97 - December 13, 2008
---
Welcome to issue 97 of HWN, a newsletter covering
Hello all. I've got a puzzling Parsec problem. Perhaps the collective wisdom
of haskell-cafe can point me in the right direction.
I want to be able to parse a string of digits to a type level numeral as
described in the Number parameterized
2008/12/13 Nathan Bloomfield nblo...@gmail.com:
I want to be able to parse a string of digits to a type level numeral as
described in the Number parameterized types paper.
Hi, I'm at UA too (bsl04). Here's a quick try. Sorry if I'm not
getting what you're doing.
import Text.Parsec
import
2008/12/11 Luke Palmer lrpal...@gmail.com:
If you could guarantee that the ID of a key is globally unique, even through
different invocations of the monad (using eg. unsafePerformIO newUnique),
then you could ensure type safety and allow transport of keys between
different monads.
Well, for
You're almost there, but you have correctly determined the problem;
you need to know the type of the parse result in order to parse.
However, it is possible to hide the type from the parser; try writing
this function instead:
{-# LANGUAGE ExistentialQuantification #-}
data AnyCard = forall t.
2008/12/13 Nathan Bloomfield nblo...@gmail.com:
I want to be able to parse a string of digits to a type level numeral as
described in the Number parameterized types paper. After fiddling with the
problem for a while, I'm not convinced it's possible- it seems as though one
would need to know
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Andrew Coppin
andrewcop...@btinternet.com wrote:
BTW, does anybody know how rank-N types are different from existential
types?
You mean the Haskell extensions?
ExistentialQuantification lets you define types such as,
data SomeNum = forall a. Num a =
Hello,
I've presented a small practical course[0] in EMSL[1]. Any comments are
welcome.
0: http://marcot.iaaeee.org/mini-curso.pdf (Portuguese only)
1: http://emsl.softwarelivre.org/
Greetings.
--
marcot
http://marcot.iaaeee.org/
___
Haskell-Cafe
marcot:
Hello,
I've presented a small practical course[0] in EMSL[1]. Any comments are
welcome.
0: http://marcot.iaaeee.org/mini-curso.pdf (Portuguese only)
1: http://emsl.softwarelivre.org/
Wonderful. Maybe you can add it to the .pt section of the Haskell wiki?
Em Sáb, 2008-12-13 às 13:07 -0800, Don Stewart escreveu:
marcot:
Hello,
I've presented a small practical course[0] in EMSL[1]. Any comments are
welcome.
0: http://marcot.iaaeee.org/mini-curso.pdf (Portuguese only)
1: http://emsl.softwarelivre.org/
Wonderful. Maybe you can
David Menendez wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Andrew Coppin
andrewcop...@btinternet.com wrote:
BTW, does anybody know how rank-N types are different from existential
types?
You mean the Haskell extensions?
ExistentialQuantification lets you define types such as,
data
Am Sonntag, 14. Dezember 2008 00:00 schrieb Andrew Coppin:
David Menendez wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Andrew Coppin
andrewcop...@btinternet.com wrote:
BTW, does anybody know how rank-N types are different from existential
types?
You mean the Haskell extensions?
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Coppin
andrewcop...@btinternet.com wrote:
So how is
foo :: ((forall b. a - m b) - m a) - m a
different from
bar :: forall b. ((a - m b) - m a) - m a
Lets use a simpler example:
foo :: (forall a. a - a) - (Int, String)
bar :: forall a. (a - a) -
* On Saturday, December 13 2008, Gianfranco Alongi wrote:
I have actually been thinking about a similar thing, but on the group
subject.
One can actually group things in many ways, such as groupBy (==) , so
that groupBy (==) [1,2,1,2] should give
[[1,1],[2,2]]. Of course other ideas are
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 00:35 -0500, Adam Vogt wrote:
On another note, is there much use of such simple library functions: does
concatMap, for instance, save anything other than a couple parantheses, or
does (concat . map) not necessarily get optimized into the same thing
Bart Massey’s results
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 19:46 +1300, George Pollard wrote:
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 00:35 -0500, Adam Vogt wrote:
On another note, is there much use of such simple library functions: does
concatMap, for instance, save anything other than a couple parantheses, or
does (concat . map) not
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Andrew Coppin
andrewcop...@btinternet.com wrote:
David Menendez wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Andrew Coppin
andrewcop...@btinternet.com wrote:
BTW, does anybody know how rank-N types are different from existential
types?
You mean the Haskell
30 matches
Mail list logo
