Re: recent summary for basAlgPropos discussion

2000-05-06 Thread Bart Demoen
. Waiting until runtime is bad. (sorry if this was beside the point) Bart Demoen

Re: recent summary for basAlgPropos discussion

2000-05-06 Thread Bart Demoen
Marcin Kowalczyk wrote: I am quite happy with not getting a compile-time error for non-implemented class methods, as long as I get a compile-time error when I try to use a non-implemented class method. This is impossible. Thank you. In that case I agree with Fergus. Bart Demoen

Re: Partial Type Declarations

1999-11-17 Thread Bart Demoen
is allowed even in the type definitions. Abduction in this case is close to constraint solving (in spirit at least). By the end of next week, there should be a home page for HAL at http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~mbanda/hal Bart Demoen

Re: Cryptarithm solver - comparing oranges and oranges

1999-09-18 Thread Bart Demoen
is an issue as well. Cheers Bart Demoen

Re: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++

1999-09-18 Thread Bart Demoen
you want to compete with C on. And feasability, not speed. Cheers Bart Demoen

Re: Again: Referential Equality

1999-07-28 Thread Bart Demoen
programmer in heart and kidneys (as the flemmish expression goes) and still stick to Mercury. Bart Demoen

Re: more on Rules

1999-05-06 Thread Bart Demoen
I am for sure going to read the paper of Ariola Arvind, but Without optimizations this program will produce _|_ but with optimizations it will produce 3. wouldn't such an optimisation be called "a bug in the compiler" ? Bart Demoen

Re: Goals for Haskell 2 - and a proposal

1999-02-14 Thread Bart Demoen
] i l = l Bart Demoen