Re: [ANNOUNCE] GHC 9.4.3 is now available

On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 at 05:00, Ben Gamari wrote: > The GHC developers are happy to announce the availability of GHC 9.4.3. > Thank you - I updated the Fedora ghc9.4 package to 9.4.3. Fedora users can install it from updates-testing repos already (available for several days now) . The EPEL9 build

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GHC 9.4.2 is now available

On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 at 02:56, Ben Gamari wrote: > The GHC developers are happy to announce the availability of GHC 9.4.2. > Thanks! I have built it for Fedora Linux and EPEL 9, where it can be installed now from the testing repos, eg: $ sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing ghc9.4

Re: [Haskell] [ANNOUNCE] GHC 9.2.4 released

Late follow-up on Fedora... On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 19:17, Zubin Duggal wrote: > The GHC developers are very happy to at announce the availability of GHC > 9.2.4. > That was great news, thank you. I just wanted to share that the Fedora Linux ghc9.2 packages have been updated to 9.2.4 (and have

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GHC 9.4.1 is now available

On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 at 05:30, Ben Gamari wrote: > The GHC developers are very pleased to announce the availability of GHC > 9.4.1. > Thank you for the new major version release. I have built it for all current Fedora releases and EPEL9 in the ghc9.4 package. For those interested you can check

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GHC 9.2.2 is now available

On Mon, 7 Mar 2022 at 07:02, Ben Gamari wrote: > The GHC developers are very happy to at announce the availability of GHC > > 9.2.2. > Great, thank you! I have updated the Fedora ghc9.2 package to 9.2.2. So if you are running Fedora 35 or higher you can install it now from the updates-testing

Re: [Haskell] [ANNOUNCE] GHC 9.0.2 released

I am talking about. (I first discovered this because it broke the Fedora build - so I just remove it before building.) Jens On Sun, Jan 23, 2022, 2:31 AM Jens Petersen wrote: > >> First of all a big thank you and congratulations on the highly >> anticipated 9.0.2 release. >>

Re: [Haskell] [ANNOUNCE] GHC 9.0.2 released

First of all a big thank you and congratulations on the highly anticipated 9.0.2 release. I have been putting off this mail for a while: I actually built it last month right away in Fedora's new ghc9.0 package (available now for all current Fedora releases). Also Stackage Nightly (primarily

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GHC 9.2.1 now available

On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 at 23:54, Ben Gamari wrote: > https://downloads.haskell.org/ghc/9.2.1 > If you are on Fedora you can now install ghc-9.2.1 with: sudo dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular module install ghc:9.2/default Cheers, Jens ___

Re: [Haskell] [ANNOUNCE] GHC 8.10.5 released

On Sun, 6 Jun 2021 at 08:11, Zubin Duggal wrote: > The GHC team is very pleased to announce the availability of GHC 8.10.5. > Thank you and congratulations on the release. Fedora users can try it now already with : sudo dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular module install ghc:8.10 on

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GHC 8.10.4 released

On Sun, 7 Feb 2021 at 00:17, Ben Gamari wrote: > The GHC team is very pleased to announce the availability of GHC 8.10.4. > Thank you! This is now already built for Fedora and can be tested/installed with: dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular module install ghc:8.10/default It should go

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GHC 9.0.1 released

On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 at 02:04, Ben Gamari wrote: > The GHC team is very pleased to announce the availability of GHC 9.0.1. > This is now testable in Fedora with: sudo dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular install ghc:9.0/default Thanks, Jens ___

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Glasgow Haskell Compiler 9.0.1-rc1 released

Thanks - I forgot to follow up earlier but on Fedora you can test 9.0.1 RC1 now with: sudo dnf module install ghc:9.0/default Jens ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Glasgow Haskell Compiler 9.0.1-alpha1 released

Very late followup, but I just wanted to share that Fedora users can install this now (stable since last week) with: sudo dnf module install ghc:9.0/default Thanks, Jens ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Glasgow Haskell Compiler 8.10.1 released

On Sun, 17 May 2020 at 10:18, Jens Petersen wrote: > Is it intentional that the text library in 8.10.1 is older than the one in > 8.8? > Ben pointed me at https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/issues/17956 in irc. Thanks, Jens ___ Glasgow-hask

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Glasgow Haskell Compiler 8.10.1 released

Hi, late question, I just noticed: Is it intentional that the text library in 8.10.1 is older than the one in 8.8? (1.2.3.2 vs 1.2.4.0 ) Thanks, Jens ___

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Glasgow Haskell Compiler 8.10.1 released

On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 23:04, Ben Gamari wrote: > The GHC team is happy to announce the availability of GHC 8.10.1. > In Fedora 31 and above it can be now installed with sudo dnf module install ghc:8.10 Thanks, Jens ___ Glasgow-haskell-users

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GHC 8.8.3 is now available

On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 at 09:52, Ben Gamari wrote: > > Ben Gamari writes: > >> The GHC team is proud to announce the release of GHC 8.8.3. > Thank you, if you are in Fedora you can now install this with: `sudo dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular` module install ghc:8.8` Jens

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GHC 8.8.3 is now available

Thank you for the release. On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 at 02:02, Ben Gamari wrote: > [1] > https://downloads.haskell.org/ghc/8.8.3/docs/html/users_guide/8.8.3-notes.html > I am getting 404 from the docs. Cheers, Jens ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Glasgow Haskell Compiler 8.10.1-alpha2 released

On Thu, 12 Dec 2019 at 02:28, Ben Gamari wrote: > https://downloads.haskell.org/ghc/8.10.1-alpha2/ I also built this for fedora in 2 test builds (the latter for

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GHC 8.8.2-rc1 is now available

On Fri, 13 Dec 2019 at 04:11, Ben Gamari wrote: > https://downloads.haskell.org/~ghc/8.8.2-rc1 > Thanks! I finally got round to doing some Fedora test builds . LGTM

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GHC 8.6.5 is now available

On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 12:56, Ben Gamari wrote: > The GHC team is proud to announce the release of GHC 8.6.5. Fedora users can install this now (to test) from the ghc:8.6 module stream using the Fedora updates-testing-modular repo. ie You can install with say `sudo dnf

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GHC 8.6.3 is now available

On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 10:44, Ben Gamari wrote: > The GHC team is very happy to announce the availability of GHC 8.6.3, a > bugfix release in the GHC 8.6 series. Thanks, I have built 8.6.3 in the Fedora ghc:8.6 module for Fedora 28, 29, and also Rawhide. Currently it is still in the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GHC 8.4.4 released

On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 at 07:17, Ben Gamari wrote: > The GHC team is pleased to announce the availability of GHC 8.4.4 Thank you > As always, the full release notes can be found in the users guide, https://downloads.haskell.org/~ghc/8.4.4/docs/html/users_guide/8.4.4-notes.html#base-library I

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GHC 8.6.1 released

I have built 8.6.1 for Fedora 27, 28, 29, Rawhide, and EPEL7 in: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/petersen/ghc-8.6.1/ The repo also includes latest cabal-install. Thanks for the release! Jens On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 at 09:58, Ben Gamari wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > The GHC team is pleased

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GHC 8.6.1-beta1 available

On Sat, 11 Aug 2018 at 11:31, Ben Gamari wrote: > The GHC development team is very pleased to announce the first beta > leading up to GHC 8.6.1 release. Thank you! I have built it for Fedora and RHEL 7 in my Copr repo last week: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/petersen/ghc-8.6.1/ I was

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GHC 8.6.1-alpha2 available

On 16 July 2018 at 10:07, Ben Gamari wrote: > The GHC development team is pleased to announce the second alpha release > leading up to GHC 8.6.1. Thanks, I built it for Fedora and EPEL7 in my Copr repo: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/petersen/ghc-8.6.1/ Jens

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GHC 8.4.3 released

On 30 May 2018 at 05:07, Ben Gamari wrote: > https://downloads.haskell.org/~ghc/8.4.3 Thanks! I have built it for Fedora and EPEL 7 (RHEL/CentOS) in a Copr repo: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/petersen/ghc-8.4.3 Cheers, Jens ___

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GHC 8.4.2 released

I have built ghc-8.4.2 for Fedora and EPEL7 in https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/petersen/ghc-8.4.2/ Thanks, Jens ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GHC 8.4.1 released

On 9 March 2018 at 01:57, Ben Gamari wrote: > The GHC developers are very happy to announce the 8.4.1 release of > Glasgow Haskell Compiler. Thanks! I have built it for Fedora and EPEL7 in a copr repo: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/petersen/ghc-8.4.1/ Cheers,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GHC 8.2.2 released

On 22 November 2017 at 07:00, Ben Gamari wrote: > The Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 8.2.2 Thanks, I have finally built it for current Fedora releases and EPEL7 in my Copr repo: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/petersen/ghc-8.2.2 Jens

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Glasgow Haskell Compiler 8.0.2 is available!

On 12 January 2017 at 03:40, Ben Gamari wrote: > The GHC team is happy to at last announce the 8.0.2 release of the > Glasgow Haskell Compiler. Source and binary distributions are available > Thank you Fedora 24+ and RHEL 7 et al users can install it from my Fedora Copr

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GHC 8.0.2 release candidate 2

On 23 December 2016 at 04:38, Ben Gamari wrote: > The GHC team is happy to announce the second candidate of the > 8.0.2 release of the Glasgow Haskell Compiler. > Thanks Fedora users can install it from my Fedora Copr Repo:

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GHC 8.0.2 release candidate 1

On 26 November 2016 at 07:38, Ben Gamari wrote: > http://downloads.haskell.org/~ghc/8.0.2-rc1/ > Thank you, I built it for Fedora 25 (just released last week) and Rawhide: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/petersen/ghc-8.0.2 Hopefully there will be a build for

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GHC 8.0.1 is available!

On 22 May 2016 at 00:18, Ben Gamari wrote: > The GHC developers are very pleased to announce the release of the first > new super-major version of our Haskell compiler in six years, GHC 8.0.1. > Congratulations on the release! I forgot to mention I built it for Fedora and

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GHC 8.0.1 release candidate 4 available

On 28 April 2016 at 18:10, Ben Gamari wrote: > The GHC team is happy to announce the availability of fourth release > candidate of the Glasgow Haskell Compiler's 8.0.1 release. Thank you! I almost finished the Fedora/RHEL building in time in my Fedora Copr repo:

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GHC 8.0.1 release candidate 3 available

On 19 April 2016 at 04:54, Ben Gamari wrote: > The GHC team is happy to announce the availability of third release > candidate of the Glasgow Haskell Compiler's 8.0.1 release. Source and > binary distributions can be found at, > >

Re: Dropping bzip2 release tarballs?

On 14 January 2016 at 01:19, Ben Gamari wrote: > tl;dr do you rely on the .bz2 release tarballs on downloads.haskell.org? I don't have a strong opinion about it and understand the desire to standardize on one archive type. I use the xz src tarballs myself, but how about

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Glasgow Haskell Compiler version 7.10.3

On 9 December 2015 at 21:17, Ben Gamari wrote: > We are pleased to announce the release of GHC 7.10.3 Awesome, thank you! I have build it for Fedora and RHEL/CentOS in my Fedora Copr repo: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/petersen/ghc-7.10.3 The repos also include

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC 7.10.2 Release Candidate 2

On 3 July 2015 at 15:49, Austin Seipp aus...@well-typed.com wrote: We are pleased to announce the first release candidate for GHC 7.10.2: Thanks! I have updated my Fedora Copr 7.10.2 repo to RC2: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/petersen/ghc-7.10.2 There are builds for Fedora 22 (release)

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC 7.10.2 Release Candidate 1

On 15 June 2015 at 09:16, Austin Seipp aus...@well-typed.com wrote: We are pleased to announce the first release candidate for GHC 7.10.2: Thank you I did a 'quick' build of it for Fedora 22 in my Copr repo: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/petersen/ghc-7.10.2 I will try to update it to a

Fedora ghc-7.10.1 repo

Hi, It is a bit later than I wanted but I have prepared a Fedora Copr repo for ghc-7.10.1. https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/petersen/ghc-7.10.1/ (note the EPEL7 and F20 builds are currently quick builds and the F21+ builds are perf builds) I will probably add a cabal-install build soon.

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC 7.10.1 Release Candidate 2

On 27 January 2015 at 01:13, Austin Seipp aus...@well-typed.com wrote: We are pleased to announce the second release candidate for GHC 7.10.1: Thanks, I updated my Fedora ghc-7.10 Copr repo to RC2: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/petersen/ghc-7.10/ (The build is currently only for

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 7.8.4

The GHC Team is pleased to announce a new patchlevel release of GHC, 7.8.4. Thanks, I created a Fedora Copr repo with 7.8.4: http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/petersen/ghc-7.8.4/ it has builds for current Fedora releases and EPEL 7. Cheers, Jens

Re: [Haskell] ANNOUNCE: jhc-0.8.1

Thank you for the new release. :) On 13 May 2014 04:40, John Meacham j...@repetae.net wrote: as for the packages i've been testing with fgl,regex-compat,bytestring,binary,mtl,containers,unix,utf8-string,zlib,HsSyck,filepath,process,syb,old-time,pretty. and editline ? For me it fails to

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 7.8.2

On 12 April 2014 22:30, Austin Seipp aus...@well-typed.com wrote: https://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/7.8.2/html/users_guide/release-7-8-2.html Thank you very much! I have built it for Fedora 20 in my Copr repo: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/petersen/ghc-7.8/. (You can also install

RHEL/EPEL 5 ghc packages

Hi, I wanted to mention some newer ghc builds I have made for RHEL5. EPEL5 currently has ghc-6.12.3 in stable, but I have built ghc-7.0.4 which has been in EPEL5 testing now for over a month. The update also includes cabal-install. I am planning to push it to stable this month but I wanted to

test build of current ghc-7.8

Hi, I did a test build [1] of the current ghc-7.8 branch for Fedora 21 devel, which I think should also install to Fedora 20. I put the packages for x86_64, i386 and armv7hl into the yum repos under http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/petersen/ghc-7.7/ I haven't tested this latest build yet but

Re: test build of current ghc-7.8

Hi Joachim, Am Montag, den 03.02.2014, 19:49 +0900 schrieb Jens Petersen: Hi, I did a test build [1] of the current ghc-7.8 branch for Fedora 21 devel, which I think should also install to Fedora 20. I’m surprised that it worked for you. Did not you not hit http://ghc.haskell.org/trac

Re: RFC: include a cabal-install executable in future GHC releases

+1 for Carter's proposal - I had actually been planning to make the same suggestion, but just saw this thread now... On 27 January 2014 09:39, Austin Seipp aus...@well-typed.com wrote: As for shipping with GHC itself: this is technically possible, but slightly annoying to implement, and it

Re: ghc src snapshots

I uploaded a newer source tarball snapshot to: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc/ghc-7.7.20131217-src.tar.bz2 I think it builds okay. Jens ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org

Re: ghc src snapshots

I built http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc/ghc-7.7.20131005-src.tar.bz2http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc/ for Fedora (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6034005) and uploaded the builds for x86_64, i686 and armv7hl to my fedorapeople repo:

Re: Linux deployment requirements for GHC-produced binaries

I suspect the OP's exectuable is already being compiled static. Yes; which leaves the question of why it requires libgmp.so, and if it's static the only things I can think of are (a) it's using dlopen(), or (b) it's running something else that is not static and requires libgmp.so. You

Fedora ghc-7.7 repo

I setup an experimental Fedora 20 repo for ghc-7.7 at http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/petersen/ghc-7.7 which currently has builds of ghc-7.7.20130828 for x86_64, i686, and armv7hl without profiling. Let me know if you notice any problems with it. Thanks, Jens

Re: bundled libraries in ghc

On 3 September 2013 18:14, Jens Petersen peter...@fedoraproject.org wrote: The libraries in question here are haskeline, terminfo, and xhtml. : Besides I am anyway not really sure how to handle having both those 3 shared libraries installed for runtime ghc along with the same versions

Re: bundled libraries in ghc

On 3 September 2013 23:11, Stephen Paul Weber singpol...@singpolyma.netwrote: Somebody claiming to be Jens Petersen wrote: The libraries in question here are haskeline, terminfo, and xhtml. Are those libraries needed by GHCI? libdir/bin/ghc is linked to haskeline and terminfo. ghc-pkg

bundled libraries in ghc

Hi, I have been doing some test builds of ghc-7.7 recently. Since ghc gets built now with dynamic linking by default, the bundled linked libraries that ghc does not ship are more visible now: this is not really a new problem per se just that now with shared libraries by default it is more

executable stack flag

Hi, We noticed [1] in Fedora that ghc (7.4 and 7.6) are linking executables (again [2]) with the executable stack flag set. I haven't starting looking at the ghc code yet but wanted to ask first if it is intentional/necessary? (ghc-7.0 doesn't seem to do this.) Having the flag set is considered

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 7.6.3

The GHC Team is pleased to announce a new patchlevel release of GHC, 7.6.3. I made a test repo for Fedora 19 (in development) x86_64: http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/petersen/ghc-7.6.3/ Once Haskell Platform for ghc-7.6 is available I will add that too. ghc-7.6.3 should be in the future

Re: [Haskell] ANNOUNCE: GHC version 7.6.3

The GHC Team is pleased to announce a new patchlevel release of GHC, 7.6.3. I made a test repo for Fedora 19 (in development) x86_64: http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/petersen/ghc-7.6.3/ Once Haskell Platform for ghc-7.6 is available I will add that too. ghc-7.6.3 should be in the future

ghc and aarch64?

I am curious if anyone has started or is planning to work on porting GHC to the new ARM 64bit architecture AArch64 for Linux? Jens ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 7.6.2

On 30 January 2013 02:25, Ian Lynagh i...@well-typed.com wrote: The GHC Team is pleased to announce a new patchlevel release of GHC, 7.6.2. http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/7.6.2/html/users_guide/release-7-6-2.html Thank you for the release! I have done test scratch builds for Fedora 19

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC 7.6.2 Release Candidate 1

Sorry rather late follow up: On 10 December 2012 06:39, Ian Lynagh i...@well-typed.com wrote: We are pleased to announce the first release candidate for GHC 7.6.2: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/7.6.2-rc1/ BTW the ghc-7.6 source tarballs are huge: does

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC 7.6.2 Release Candidate 1

http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-7.6/ghc-7.6.1.20121207-10.1.fc19.src.rpm Also successfully did a test build on Fedora Rawhide ARM: http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=140431 Jens ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC 7.6.2 Release Candidate 1

Also successfully did a test build on Fedora Rawhide ARM: Sorry, the correct url is: http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1404311 (this build is against ghc-7.4.2 btw). ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list

Re: Dynamic libraries by default and GHC 7.8

Hi, GHC HEAD now has support for using dynamic libraries by default (and in particular, using dynamic libraries and the system linker in GHCi) for a number of platforms. I am very happy to hear this news. I have long been a quiet proponent for defaulting ghc and Cabal to shared libraries and

Re: Dynamic libraries by default and GHC 7.8

On 28 November 2012 03:02, Ian Lynagh i...@well-typed.com wrote: We actually have half a plan to fix this, so that a single compilation would build both static and dynamic libraries. Most of the work (parsing, type checking, optimising) can be shared; it's just the codegen phase that needs to

Re: Dynamic libraries by default and GHC 7.8

On 28 November 2012 08:28, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org wrote: Open question: What should GHC on Debian do when building binaries, given that all libraries are likely available in both ways – shared or static. Shared means that all locally built binaries (e.g. xmonad!) will suddenly

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 7.6.1

(Note that ghc-7.4.1 at least does not build [on ARM] with ghc-patched llvm-3.1.) But ghc-7.4.2 does, for the record. ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 7.6.1

Thanks! I have done a full test build for Fedora 18 Development on x86_64 which you can install from my new testing repo: http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/petersen/ghc/ It seems to work fine on Fedora 17 too for me. There is now a working cabal-install-0.15.1 build there too (patching

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 7.6.1

On 7 September 2012 01:05, Ian Lynagh i...@well-typed.com wrote: The GHC Team is pleased to announce a new major release of GHC, 7.6.1. Thanks! I have done a full test build for Fedora 18 Development on x86_64 which you can install from my new testing repo:

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC 7.6.1 Release Candidate 1

On 13 August 2012 04:57, Ian Lynagh i...@well-typed.com wrote: We are pleased to announce the first release candidate for GHC 7.6.1: Thanks! Seems to build ok for me on Fedora 17. Small thing: I noticed that all libraries got bumped except pretty - I assume that is intentional? Jens

Re: GHC ARM builds?

On 12 July 2012 14:41, Jens Petersen j...@community.haskell.org wrote: ghc-7.4.2 should also build fine on Fedora 17 ARM. Well, at least with Karel's armhfp patch... Just yum install ghc llvm first. I tested building RC1 on Fedora ARM, and this is basically the same srpm (src rpm package

Re: GHC ARM builds?

ghc-7.4.2 should also build fine on Fedora 17 ARM. Just yum install ghc llvm first. I can provide a src rpm if it helps. Jens ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Announce: Haskell Platform 2012.2.0.0

Congratulations on the release! Thank you for all the hard work and great to see it come out in this timely manner. :-) It's a relatively minor thing, but I noticed that the above URL redirects to    http://hackage.haskell.org/platform// which is incidentally considered a different URL from

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC 7.4.2 Release Candidate 1

On 18 May 2012 10:34, Jens Petersen j...@community.haskell.org wrote: I also just started a test build on Fedora ARM but that will take a little longer to finish. The ARM also finished successfully: http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=838546 (with the same ARM patches

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC 7.4.2 Release Candidate 1

On 16 May 2012 19:05, Ian Lynagh ig...@earth.li wrote: We are pleased to announce the first release candidate for GHC 7.4.2:    http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/7.4.2-rc1/ Thanks! I did a test scratch build on Fedora 18, which should also work on Fedora 17 which will be released soon.

Re: trouble building ghc-7.4 on Fedora 18 (devel) ARM

A late followup, just to let you know, everything is good now. Not sure if +d16 is actually essential on Fedora though guess it doesn't hurt. It is... I hope llvm will make it the default for armv7 hardware fp. So finally ghc-7.4.1 is built for Fedora ARM and working: I also had to

Re: trouble building ghc-7.4 on Fedora 18 (devel) ARM

   - debian/patches/armhf_llvm_abi: Pass -float-abi=hard to llc on armhf if      __ARM_PCS_VFP is defined (needs to be preprocessed for this)    - debian/rules: Define __ARM_PCS_VFP on armhf for the above patch. you might need to set __ARM_PCS_VFP. This is the code in debian/rules: Thanks

trouble building ghc-7.4 on Fedora 18 (devel) ARM

Hi, I have been struggling to build ghc74 on ARM (ideally with llvm3) on Fedora 18 (the current development tree). After applying 4 recent ARM patches from Debian the ghc-7.4.1 build gets to: : inplace/bin/ghc-stage1 -H32m -O-package-name base-4.5.0.0 -hide-all-packages -i

Re: [Haskell] ANNOUNCE: GHC version 7.2.2

The GHC Team is pleased to announce a new bugfix release of GHC, 7.2.2. Thanks! I have done a test build for Fedora 17 development: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3512016 http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/scratch/petersen/task_3512016/ The testsuite results look pretty

Re: GHC 7.2.2 RC 1

We are pleased to announce the first release candidate for GHC 7.2.2:    http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/7.2.2-rc1/ Thanks, I did a test build for Fedora 17 Development. If you wish to test it on Fedora you can get the srpm or binary packages from:

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 7.2.1

On 19 August 2011 17:15, Jens Petersen j...@community.haskell.org wrote: I have done a test build of 7.2.1 for Fedora [17]: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3267317 Since the test rpms are now gone from Koji and I don't think I will start building 7.2 properly for Fedora until

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 7.2.1

I have done a test build of 7.2.1 for Fedora [17]: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3267317 The test results with system libffi are the same as I reported earlier except for 1 unexpected failure on x86_64:   ghci/should_run  3171 [bad stdout] (normal) Out of curiosity and

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 7.2.1

The GHC Team is pleased to announce a new major release of GHC, 7.2.1. Thank you! I have done a test build of 7.2.1 for Fedora: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3267317 You can download the binary packages for example like this for 2 weeks: $ lftp

Re: [Haskell] ANNOUNCE: GHC version 7.2.1

The GHC Team is pleased to announce a new major release of GHC, 7.2.1. Thank you! I have done a test build of 7.2.1 for Fedora: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3267317 You can download the binary packages for example like this for 2 weeks: $ lftp

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC 7.2.1 Release Candidate 1

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3251249name=build.log . | *** unexpected failure for fed001(normal) Note the Fedora build is patched to use system libffi. Hmm. What happens if you don't patch it? More hmmm: that makes the x86 unexpected errors go to 0!

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC 7.2.1 Release Candidate 1

On 5 August 2011 05:27, Ian Lynagh ig...@earth.li wrote: from http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3251249name=build.log . | *** unexpected failure for fed001(normal) but it works fine for me on x86/Linux. Note the Fedora build is patched to use system libffi. Hmm. What

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC 7.2.1 Release Candidate 1

We are pleased to announce the first release candidate for GHC 7.2.1: Thanks! I have done a test build in Fedora's buildsystem: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3249014 If you want to try it, you should be able to download and install it as follows: $ lftp

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC 7.2.1 Release Candidate 1

On 3 August 2011 19:01, Jens Petersen j...@community.haskell.org wrote: Thanks!  I have done a test build in Fedora's buildsystem: (Note this is a bootstrap build without shared libraries.) Ok I did a more normal build today with shared libs and ran the testsuite too: http

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 7.0.4

 http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/7.0.4/html/users_guide/release-7-0-4.html Thank you for the release! I build it for the Fedora 16 Rawhide development tree last week. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=248071 Now gradually working through rebuilding all the hackages... Jens

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC 7.0.4 Release Candidate 1

On 4 June 2011 02:18, Ian Lynagh ig...@earth.li wrote: We are pleased to announce the first release candidate for GHC 7.0.4: Great, I did a buildsystem testbuild ghc-7.0.3.20110531-23.1.fc16 for Fedora. If you want to try it, you should be able to install it as follows: $ lftp

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 7.0.3

I made a test build for F16 development: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2955509 We'll probably move Fedora rawhide to 7.0.3 before too long. Jens FYI testsuite results: 59 unexpected failures on x86-64: 2592(profc) 3586(normal) 4038(normal) Cpr001(optc)

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 7.0.3

On 29 March 2011 11:33, Jens Petersen j...@community.haskell.org wrote: I made a test build for F16 development: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2955509 Note since there are a lot of subpackages now, they can be downloaded with a client like lftp from http

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC 7.0.2 Release Candidate 1

http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/7.0.2-rc1/ Thanks - I did a test build using Fedora's development tree: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2676700 Jens ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org

Re: [Haskell] ANNOUNCE: GHC version 7.0.1

On 16 November 2010 10:09, Ian Lynagh ig...@earth.li wrote:   =    The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 7.0.1   = Thanks for the release. ghc-7.0.1 has been

Re: [Haskell] ANNOUNCE: GHC version 7.0.1

On 16 November 2010 10:09, Ian Lynagh ig...@earth.li wrote:   =    The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 7.0.1   = Thanks for the release. ghc-7.0.1 has been

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC 7.0.1 Release Candidate 2

On 30 October 2010 04:38, Ian Lynagh ig...@earth.li wrote: We are pleased to announce the second release candidate for GHC 7.0.1:    http://new-www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/7.0.1-rc2/ : Please test as much as possible; bugs are much cheaper if we find them before the release! Thanks I did a

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC 7.0.1 Release Candidate 1

We are pleased to announce the first release candidate for GHC 7.0.1 Thank you! :) Are you going to bootstrap the testsuite? I would like to run it but having trouble working out how to do that. Jens ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC 7.0.1 Release Candidate 1

   http://new-www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/7.0.1-rc1/ I did a successful test build in the fedora buildsys: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2492660 Jens ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org

Re: [Haskell-cafe] ANNOUNCE: darcs 2.5 beta 3

If I understand him correctly, he's saying the tarballs have the same contents but different checksums (well, md5/sha-1/sha-256/whatever hashes).  Which would imply they're duplicating effort and confusing anyone trying to keep archives. Right (the timestamps inside the tarballs are actually

  1   2   3   >