RE: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime

2000-08-11 Thread R.S. Nikhil
-Original Message- From: Fergus Henderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 11, 2000 4:18 AM ... In particular http://commnet.pdc.mscorpevents.com/sessions.asp. However, as seems to be usual (%*^#*^#@!) for MS, this page is NOT written in portable HTML. Certainly

Re: Sets of IOErrors?

1999-09-29 Thread R.S. Nikhil
[ Apologies that this message is not about Haskell, but it is about interesting use of language! ] Amazingly, Perec's book has been translated into English, by Gilbert Adair, completely maintaining it's "e-less" constraint! The title of the English translation is "A Void" (the French title

RE: Cryptarithm solver - Haskell vs. C++

1999-09-22 Thread R.S. Nikhil
-Original Message- From: Manuel M. T. Chakravarty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 1999 4:35 AM ... * While Sisal is arguably nice than Fortran, it doesn't really provide a new killer feature - rewriting all this Fortran code, just for getting nice

RE: Modifying the monomorphism restriction

1999-02-24 Thread R.S. Nikhil
-Original Message- From: Joe English [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 1999 2:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Modifying the monomorphism restriction This is a good idea, except for the use of ':='. I'd hate to lose that symbol from the programmers'

RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing?

1998-10-16 Thread R.S. Nikhil
What Simon is probably referring to is the fact that Fortran compilers attempt to convert the internal representation of the program into "SSA-form" (Static Single Assignment form). You might want to take a look at the following article that makes this point well: "SSA is Functional

RE: Haskell in Scientific Computing?

1998-10-16 Thread R.S. Nikhil
From: Alex Ferguson[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Various people write: cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] And so on. Please, these are _not_ the correct list addresses to us for this list -- all list mail ought to go to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and not any of these variants. And

Rationale available somewhere?

1997-08-13 Thread R.S. Nikhil
Is there a ``rationale'' document for Haskell 1.4 available somewhere? I'm trying to figure out some things without having to bug the whole mailing list (such as why the Ix class needs Show and Ord, and why it contains range; aren't the functions index and inRange enough?) Nikhil

Re. Stumped without mutation...

1997-08-09 Thread R.S. Nikhil
Jim Callahan says: It seems that there is no way to update even the smallest part of the data-structure without having to traverse the entire thing. This seems to be an inherent property of purely functional languages. This might not be a big deal with linked lists but