Ben Millwood wrote:
I once spent some time and energy making [foo| bar baz |\] quux |] do
the right thing for a quasiquoter I implemented, only to discover that
GHC already supports [foo| bar baz \|] quux |]. So yes, you can escape
it.
Wow, that actually works.
That is very surprising,
Steffen Schuldenzucker wrote:
Btw., does TH parse this correctly? (If I was TH, I would not):
myPHPCode = [s|
?php
$description = Use the quasiquoter like this: [s|some text|];
print $description.\n;
?
|]
(the tricky part is |] occurring in the quoted text)
Can we escape it?
Yes, like
Steffen Schuldenzucker wrote:
* Embed Haskell into some other language is solved by Literate Haskell
* Embed some other language into Haskell is solved by heredocs
Dave Bayer wrote:
Nice pairing. I wrote my own literate preprocessor, which GHC gracefully
accepts, to accomplish both of these
2011/6/28 Steffen Schuldenzucker sschuldenzuc...@uni-bonn.de:
Btw., does TH parse this correctly? (If I was TH, I would not):
myPHPCode = [s|
?php
$description = Use the quasiquoter like this: [s|some text|];
print $description.\n;
?
|]
(the tricky part is |] occurring in the quoted
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:13:19 -0700
Dave Bayer ba...@cpw.math.columbia.edu wrote:
Part of the dominance of scripting languages is clean support for
heredocs. So much of every arena of life comes down to getting It's
not about me! I love Haskell but it doesn't get this. Imagine a
document
Hi Audrey,
are you aware that Haskell already supports multi-line strings?
foo = This is a\
\multi-line\
\string!
See Section 2.6 of http://haskell.org/onlinereport/lexemes.html
Regards,
Jean
On 25.06.11 22:55, 唐鳳 wrote:
Hi all,
I've just released string-qq 0.0.2 to
2011/6/28 Jean-Marie Gaillourdet j...@gaillourdet.net:
Hi Audrey,
are you aware that Haskell already supports multi-line strings?
foo = This is a\
\multi-line\
\string!
See Section 2.6 of http://haskell.org/onlinereport/lexemes.html
I've used this approach for multi-line
Jean-Marie Gaillourdet 於 2011/6/28 下午4:57 寫道：
Hi Audrey,
are you aware that Haskell already supports multi-line strings?
foo = This is a\
\multi-line\
\string!
Hi Jean-Marie,
Yeah, I am aware of that, I wrote a 381-lines multi-lines strings once… :-)
Part of the dominance of scripting languages is clean support for heredocs. So
much of every arena of life comes down to getting It's not about me! I love
Haskell but it doesn't get this. Imagine a document that's nominally Haskell,
but about 80% some other language such as TeX (e.g. code for a
What about Literate Haskell then? People write a lot of LH blog posts, so it
would seem to be quite flexible.
Best regards,
Krzysztof Skrzętnicki
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 16:13, Dave Bayer ba...@cpw.math.columbia.eduwrote:
Part of the dominance of scripting languages is clean support for
On 06/28/2011 08:25 PM, Krzysztof Skrzętnicki wrote:
What about Literate Haskell then? People write a lot of LH blog posts,
so it would seem to be quite flexible.
IMHO, these are different tasks.
* Embed Haskell into some other language is solved by Literate Haskell
* Embed some other
On Jun 28, 2011, at 2:34 PM, Steffen Schuldenzucker wrote:
On 06/28/2011 08:25 PM, Krzysztof Skrzętnicki wrote:
What about Literate Haskell then? People write a lot of LH blog posts,
so it would seem to be quite flexible.
IMHO, these are different tasks.
* Embed Haskell into some other
Hi all,
I've just released string-qq 0.0.2 to Hackage:
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/string-qq
The main interface is the s quasi-quoter:
foo :: IsString a = a
foo = [s|
This is a
multi-line
string!
|]
It allows simple multi-line strings of any IsString type (Text, String,
13 matches
Mail list logo
