On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 03:39:34PM -0700, Isaac Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 30 lines which said:
> One of the main topics was the perceived need of a new standard, As someone who is not an academic researcher and not a student in CS, I would like to express a personal opinion; we don't need a new standard. To me, Haskell needs more libraries, more users (which means more debugging and more documentations), more implementations, of course more real applications (darcs did a lot of the success of Haskell), so we can read their code, push sysadmins to install Haskell, etc. Most functional programming languages have been killed by the "CS effect": the fact that most users are more interested in exploring new areas of computer science than in producing code. Lisp and ML were killed by the explosion of many different and incompatible versions. I am not interested in Haskell++ or OOHaskell or anything like that. If people want to standardize things, their time could be, IMHO, best spent by standardizing libraries (I just recently discovered that Text.Regex is not standard and my programs do not run under hugs). _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list Haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
