I spent an awful lot of time doing a brain-dump into these pages and am a
bit dissapointed that they seemed to have dissappeared without
trace. Were these archived anywhere
Yes, they are in fact still there (they are all in RCS). The problem is, the Wiki is
broken. I'm going to try and
PROTECTED]
cc:[EMAIL PROTECTED], (bcc: Chris Angus/Lawson)
Subject:Re: Design patterns in Haskell
size. while there's really no substitute for experience, i really
believe we could benefit from some patterns.
There was a list of design patterns for Haskell on the Wiki (back
Andrew J Bromage wrote (on 03-12-02 09:52 +1100):
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 08:26:06AM +0100, Johannes Waldmann wrote:
well I love design patterns, it's just that in Haskell-land
they are called higher-order functions, or polymorphic functions, etc.
Can I safely translate that as We use
[Frank Atanassow [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Furthermore, design patterns come with a set of informal hints about when and
where to apply the pattern. The notion of HOF is, of course, completely
neutral about this, except insofar as the type system forces you to provide a
HOF where a function is
size. while there's really no substitute for experience, i really
believe we could benefit from some patterns.
There was a list of design patterns for Haskell on the Wiki (back in
the days when it worked):
http://haskell.org/wiki/wiki?CommonHaskellIdioms
--KW 8-)
--
Keith Wansbrough [EMAIL
I shamelessly copy from the abstract of [1]:
We contend that design patterns can be an effective means of
consolidating and communicating program construction expertise for
functional programming just as they have proven to be in
object-oriented programming. One might suppose that the powerful
