Jerome K. Jerome wrote
> George said:
>
> "You know we are on a wrong track altogether. We must not think of the
> things we could do with, but only of the things that we can't do
> without."
("Three Men in a Boat", chapter III)
By all means write new libraries. But this doesn't have to have anything
to do with the Haskell standard. Plenty of people use functions from
Posix or GMP in C programs without needing them to be part of the ANSI
standard.
The Haskell standard (including libraries) is already quite complicated
enough. I repeat my call that it would be better to document what
we have than to add yet more badly-documented facilities.
