Mark Utting writes:
fb::IO ()
fb =
do {
putStr "Enter Data: ";
line - getLine;
let line2 = line;
putStr line2;
}
ERROR "f.hs" (line 13): Syntax error in definition
(unexpected symbol "putStr")
I find it hard to determine
fb =
do {
putStr "Enter Data: ";
line - getLine;
let line2 = line;
putStr line2;
}
I suggest doing this:
fb =
do { putStr "Enter Data: "
; line - getLine
; let line2 = line
; putStr line2
}
which looks
Mark Utting writes:
fb::IO ()
fb =
do {
putStr "Enter Data: ";
line - getLine;
let line2 = line;
putStr line2;
}
ERROR "f.hs" (line 13): Syntax error in definition
(unexpected symbol "putStr")
I find it hard
Mark Utting wrote:
Summary: Haskell layout has problems within 'do' (see below).
Can we change Haskell to improve it?
I don't think the language has to be changed. It seems to me that the
problems is more with the idea of editing the source code as plain text.
Ideally, I would like
Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:20:19 +1300, Mark Utting [EMAIL PROTECTED] pisze:
fb::IO ()
fb =
do {
putStr "Enter Data: ";
line - getLine;
let line2 = line;
putStr line2;
}
I have a different proposal. Let's drop the 'let' keyword in value
bindings in a
