Nice, except that operator names that start with ':' are constructors.
Have you seen the paper Do we need dependent types
http://www.brics.dk/RS/01/10/? They do the same trick, and go
further.
--Dylan
No; but now I have it.
I do not know where to use zipWith8 instead of operators.
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 06:32:27PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
I'm new to this mailing list. (and still a relative newbie in Haskell -
learning GraphicsLib)
Because the Wish List did not work (maybe it is my browsers fault), I now
write it to this list.
I found the zipWithN
Hi all.
I'm new to this mailing list. (and still a relative newbie in Haskell -
learning GraphicsLib)
Because the Wish List did not work (maybe it is my browsers fault), I now
write it to this list.
I found the zipWithN functions in the standard libs, but imho it would be
much more comfortable
in Haskell).
Cheers,
- Conal
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2002 9:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: zipWith, zipWith3, zipWith4 looks gawky, IMHO
Hi all.
I'm new to this mailing list. (and still a relative
