On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 10:00:32AM -0700, David Roundy wrote:
Could you summarize the major tickets for 6.6.2?
The list milestoned or 6.6.2 is here:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/query?status=newstatus=assignedstatus=reopenedmilestone=6.6.2order=priority
Not all of them would
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 06:15:49PM +0100, Neil Mitchell wrote:
Release plans:
- get external core working again
Can't this happen entirely separate from any GHC releases?
It will work in the HEAD as soon as it's done, but it won't be in a
released compiler until the release after that.
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 05:08:34PM -0400, Isaac Dupree wrote:
Should other people like me ask to be added to the developer group?
Yes.
(username Isaac Dupree).
I've added you.
Thanks
Ian
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
=
The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 6.6.1
=
The GHC Team is pleased to announce a new patchlevel release of GHC.
This release contains a
Hi Bas,
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 11:54:35AM +, Bas van Dijk wrote:
I'm trying to build GHC from darcs. Unfortunately compilation fails
with the following error:
...
cpphs: #error Please define LEFTMOST_BIT to be 2^(SIZEOF_HSWORD*8-1)
in GHC/Num.lhs at line 27 col 1
make[1]: ***
Hi Cristian,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 07:00:51PM +0200, Cristian Perfumo wrote:
We've been trying to compile GHC 6.6 on ia64, and although we have
applied the patch on http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1150 ,
we still get some mangler errors with nop 0s.
As well as the patch
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 03:25:31PM -0700, Sigbjorn Finne wrote:
In case anyone's interested,
http://www.galois.com/~sof/msi/ghc-6-6-1.msi
contains a Windows installer for 6.6.1;
Thanks Sigbjorne, I've added it to the download page!
Ian
___
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 09:12:00AM -0400, Isaac Dupree wrote:
When I was doing `rm -r` on a build tree it pointed out that
driver/split/ghc-split.prl
and
driver/mangler/ghc-asm.prl
were write-protected. Tacking this down, they're generated from .lprl
with unlit... then (in mk/suffix.mk)
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 10:09:10PM +0100, Adrian Hey wrote:
Can we expect a 6.6.1 binary and/or installer for windows sometime?
You've probably already noticed, but in case not, there are now two
installers available for Windows:
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/download_ghc_661.html#windows
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 02:07:11PM +0200, Christian Maeder wrote:
Ian, could you add and upload these dists to
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/download_ghc_661.html, too?
Thanks for making them! They're now added, along with your Solaris
builds.
I wonder what the build bots said to the
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 02:22:22PM +0100, Neil Mitchell wrote:
The FFI call must create a IO monad box to put the thing in, then the
main loop strips the IO box away. If I could avoid the overhead of
creating the box in the meantime, that would be preferable.
Does the boxing not get
Hi Maxime,
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 03:58:47AM +0200, Maxime Henrion wrote:
To be more precise, I want to know how to create the
ghc-$version-$arch-boot.tar.bz2 file to redistribute to users so
that they can build GHC easily, and that on a platform that already
has a working (but older) GHC
Hi Gregory,
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 05:56:31PM -0400, Gregory Wright wrote:
On May 30, 2007, at 4:05 PM, Simon Marlow wrote:
Gregory Wright wrote:
I have put a binary distribution of ghc-6.6.1 for FreeBSD/amd64
at
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/6.6.1/ghc-6.6.1-x86_64-unknown-
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:23:57PM +0100, Neil Mitchell wrote:
All this seems to indicate that the Prelude is not a part of the
haskell98 package. Is this the case, and if so, is this
intentional? It would be nice if we could create Cabal packages that
explicitly indicate that the library
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 11:56:35AM -0400, Gregory Wright wrote:
Is this a problem with the HEAD branch or do I need a development
version
of cabal from the darcs repository to build the latest ghc?
I'm not sure exactly what you mean. You need the latest darcs Cabal in
libraries/Cabal in
Hi Serge,
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 10:14:07PM +0400, Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
1. How ghc-6.6 runs on 64-bit machines having more that 2^32
byte memory ?
Can it run into Segmentation fault ?
It's a bug if it does.
2. Can you prepare a reliable ghc-6.6 binary for Itanium
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 11:39:27AM -0700, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
Stefan is also correct that the version of GHC used should be cooked
into the name of the shared library. So a library named foo would be
installed as libfoo-ghc661.so.1, or something similar (using the soname
A minor
Hi John,
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 09:17:16AM +1000, skaller wrote:
The rules for package managers like Debian are that a component
library split into /usr/include, /usr/lib MUST have a man page,
I'm not sure where you're getting that from? Debian policy:
Hi Robin,
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 01:21:00AM -0300, Robin Bate Boerop wrote:
My build dies very soon after issuing make. Here are the last few
lines. Does anyone know what is happening and how to fix it? (The
floating constant of which the error message speaks is
__GHC_PATCHLEVEL__,
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 03:58:32PM -0300, Robin Bate Boerop wrote:
On 28/06/07, Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does /sec/bin/ghc --version say? I suspect it'll be
6.4.2.20060331 rather than 6.4.2.
Ian, indeed ghc --version was what you expected. Thank you for the
advice. My
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 03:46:31PM +0200, Christian Maeder wrote:
Christian Maeder schrieb:
I'm currently confused if it must be plural or singular (or any)
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/separate-compilation.html#keeping-intermediates
shows plural options
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 02:42:22PM -0700, Scott Dillard wrote:
You're right. I broke them when experimenting to see where the cycles
were going. I've fixed them, but the other pair of functions, named
gaussElim2, were correct and the issue remains that unsafeRead appears
slower than readArray.
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 03:04:06PM -0400, Norman Ramsey wrote:
As a Debian user who frequently operates disconnected from the
network, I have to say I have found such 'extras' packages highly
productive---the loss of disk space is more than compensated for by
the ability to continue working
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 09:46:39AM +0200, Christian Maeder wrote:
Ian Lynagh schrieb:
If you are using Debian etch then you can do
apt-get install libghc6-.*-dev
to install all GHC 6 libraries. There isn't such an easy way to install
just those (somewhat arbitrarily) defined
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 07:21:20PM -0700, chuckanut wrote:
On 7/7/07, Ronald Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://forte-intl.com/~ronald/haskell/ghc/ .
I've now added these to the GHC download page. Thanks!
Ian
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing
Hi Ronald,
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 04:22:16PM -0700, Ronald Cole wrote:
Thanks, Ian! Should I have expected to see them show up at
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/distribution_packages.html by now?
They're here: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/download_ghc_661.html#rhel
The distribution_packages
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 11:07:40AM +0900, PHO wrote:
same. The documentations of both Foreign.ForeignPtr (*1) and
Foreign.Concurrent (*2) say The only guarantee is that the finalizer
runs before the program terminates.
That's a documentation bug. In the HEAD it says:
newForeignPtr ::
Hi all,
This is just to let you know our plans for the first release of the
up-coming 6.8 branch (which will be called 6.8.1).
We are aiming to have a release candidate by the end of August, with all
the high priority bugs milestoned for 6.8 fixed:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 09:14:27AM -0500, Peter Ilberg wrote:
I've noticed an odd display problem with ghci and vim. The problem occurs
with ghci-6.6 and vim-6 on Mac OS X 10.4.9 (Terminal.app and uxrvt in
X11.app) and with ghci-6.2.2, ghci-6.6.1 and vim-7.0 on OpenBSD 4.1 (via
PuTTY from
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 10:05:17AM +0200, Mads Lindstrøm wrote:
Is this really a bug or am I doing something wrong?
Thanks for the report; it was a bug. Now fixed in the HEAD.
By the way, problems with the HEAD are best reported on the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] list.
Thanks
Ian
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 06:24:50PM +0200, Lars Oppermann wrote:
On Windows, using the binary distribution of GHC Cabal packages are, by
default, placed into C:\Program FIles\Haskell - if the --prefix option is
not used when configuring the package in order to indicate some other
location.
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 06:41:53PM +0100, Brian Hulley wrote:
I know this is a sensitive issue and I absolutely don't want to start
any kind of discussion about the merits or otherwise of LGPL, but I was
wondering if there are any plans to remove the GNU mp library from the
runtime
I'll
Hi Serge,
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 05:10:30PM +0400, Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
Yan Linah wrote about testing ghc-6.8(.1).
Please, where to take its source from?
If it is CVS, then, please, specify the command.
The 6.8 branch hasn't been forked yet.
It will be forked from the HEAD at some
Hi Wolfgang,
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 11:45:37PM +0200, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
what is the option --oldincludedir of the configure script in the current 6.7
nightly snapshot for? ./configure --help says that its default
is /usr/include. Is this directory used to install files into or is
Hi Stefan,
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 07:55:21AM +0200, Stefan Holdermans wrote:
We are pleased to announce the Release Candidate phase for GHC 6.8.1.
That's 6.8, right? Or have I missed something?
No, it's 6.8.1:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:55:31AM +0200, Tomasz Zielonka wrote:
Seems there is a missing do in compiler/main/InteractiveEval.hs on
line 334.
Thanks for the report! It will be fixed in the next snapshot.
Thanks
Ian
___
Glasgow-haskell-users
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:40:49AM -0700, Jeremy Shaw wrote:
Seems like something is wrong with this version number though:
Snapshots beginning with 6.8.20070909 are release candidates for 6.8.1
You are right, thanks. I'll fix it.
Ian
___
Hi Wolfram,
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 01:45:00PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, some of my LANGUAGE pragmas are getting quite long,
and last time I tried I was not allowed to have a line break in there.
What version of GHC are you using? This works in 6.6:
{-# LANGUAGE
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 10:39:48AM +0200, Peter Hercek wrote:
App was compiled with ghc -make -prof -auto-all files
... and run with app.exe appSpecificOptions +RTS -hc
I expected it to be in app.exe.prof (as it is with -hr
option), but that file is empty.
If you also pass -p when
Hi Dirk,
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 10:45:50AM +0200, Dirk Kleeblatt wrote:
ghc-6.8.0.20070920-i386-unknown-linux.tar.bz2
Gen.hs:13:0:
Can't find interface-file declaration for variable GHC.Base.$gfromBool
Probable cause: bug in .hi-boot file, or inconsistent .hi file
On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 10:05:53PM +0200, Wagner Ferenc wrote:
David Schonberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
'ghc -o hello hello.hs' and received the following error: hello.hs:1:0
lexical
error at character '\65279'.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byte_Order_Mark
Somehow you'll have
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 07:45:58PM -0300, Daniel Gorín wrote:
After replacing them with case statements everything compiles fine as
long
as I don't turn on -O2 optimizations :(
This boiled-down example illustrates my problem:
Thanks for the testcase! I've trac'ed it
We are pleased to announce the Second Release Candidate phase for GHC 6.8.1.
The 6.8.1 release is very close now. We only intend to look at the bugs
listed here:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/query?status=newstatus=assignedstatus=reopenedmilestone=6.8.1order=priority
so if you think
Hi Serge,
Thanks for the report!
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 07:13:47PM +0400, Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
http://botik.ru/pub/local/Mechveliani/ghcBugs/bug-6.8.0-sep28.zip
... many modules compiled
GBasFld_.hs: ...
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 12:43:05PM +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote:
For each one I'd like to identify where the HEAD repo is, what the last
released version was, what the current version number in the darcs
version is, if there are any changes since that release and if so what
the new release
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 03:00:42PM +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 14:11 +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
If anyone sees any problems with my suggested version numbers below,
please shout.
I've CCed all addresses listed as Cabal maintainers of extralibs; please
let us know
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 03:04:15PM +0100, Ross Paterson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 02:11:03PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 12:43:05PM +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote:
==
arrows
There have been no changes to the repo since that release, but as Duncan
pointed
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 09:46:39PM +0100, Ganesh Sittampalam wrote:
{-# OPTIONS_GHC -fglasgow-exts #-}
module GADT where
data C x y where
C :: P x y - C x x
data P x y where
P :: Q x y - P x y
data Q x y where
Q :: Q x y
data D x y where
D :: C y z - D x z
f
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 02:11:03PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
We've discussed this in #ghc, and we think it's best to use 4 component
version numbers so Cabal's snapshot (== append $date) version numbers do
what we want and fit in with us following the proposed policy.
Just to clarify, what I
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 09:28:51AM +0200, Jean-Philippe Bernardy wrote:
I ran into this problem with the GHC API (GHC 6.8.1 Second Release Candidate)
upon doing:
session - GHC.newSession (Just path)
I run into:
yi: Can't find package.conf as
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 02:46:13PM +, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
Yes at the moment we allow
LANGUAGE
language
but not
Language
or
LanGUAge
Being allowed to write
Language
would be nice
I concur. Surely it is easy to just
=
The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 6.8.1
=
The GHC Team is pleased to announce a new major release of GHC. There
have been a number of
Hi Bulat,
On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 01:54:19AM +0300, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
i've found that 6.6.1 downloading page
( http://haskell.org/ghc/download_ghc_661.html ) doesn't contain info
about availability of Debian, Fedora and SUSE packages. is it possible
to add it there? (also for other
Hi Christian,
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 04:59:57PM +0100, Christian Maeder wrote:
the binary ghc-6.8.1/lib/ghc-6.8.1/ghc-6.8.1 is not stripped after
installation.
I've filed a bug about make install-strip not working:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1851
Thanks
Ian
Hi Andrea,
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 11:28:53AM +0100, Andrea Rossato wrote:
1. the DocBook XSL StyleSheets (probably autoconf related): Slackware
installs them in /usr/share/xml/docbook/xsl-stylesheets*, but the
I'll apply your patch to fix this.
2. make html fails for libraries.[3]
Hi Daniil,
On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 03:49:54PM +0300, Daniil Elovkov wrote:
A quick look at the 6.8.1 user's guide reveals some broken links:
1)
Obtaining code coverage, pointing to
http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/6.8.1/html/users_guide/hpc.html
redirects to
Hi Robert,
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 10:16:09AM +0100, Robert Andersson wrote:
./../includes/GHCConstants.h:1:25: Not in scope: `zd'
Does changing line 36 of includes/mkDerivedConstants.c from
#ifdef mingw32_HOST_OS
to
#if defined(mingw32_HOST_OS) || defined(solaris2_HOST_OS)
fix it?
I also
Hi Philip,
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 09:58:40AM +0100, Philip K.F. Hölzenspies wrote:
Booting libraries/base
Booting libraries/directory
/usr/share/aclocal/progsreiserfs.m4:13: warning: underquoted definition of
AC_CHECK_LIBREISERFS
run info '(automake)Extending aclocal'
or see
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 11:59:43AM +, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 21:45 +, Ian Lynagh wrote:
Hi Philip,
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 09:58:40AM +0100, Philip K.F. Hölzenspies wrote:
Booting libraries/base
Booting libraries/directory
/usr/share/aclocal
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 05:29:05PM +1100, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
A full binary distribution of GHC 6.8.1 for Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) is
available
Thanks Manuel! I've put it on the download page.
Ian
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 12:25:12PM +0100, Christian Maeder wrote:
binary distributions of GHC 6.8.1 for Mac OS X 10.4 (Tiger)
Thanks Christian! I've put them on the download page.
Ian
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 12:46:14PM +0100, Christian Maeder wrote:
Dear Solaris Users,
binary distributions for Solaris 10 ultrasparc and i383
Thanks Christian! I've put them on the download page.
Ian
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 02:01:30AM -0700, Richard Giraud wrote:
I foggily remember previous versions of GHC being unable to create
programs that use dynamic links to libraries.
Dynamic linking to C libraries works fine.
Support is patchy for Haskell libraries in GHC 6.8.1; the plan is for
GHC
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 06:29:36AM -0700, Hal Daume III wrote:
running ubuntu. The new machine came in and I apt-get installed ghc6
ghc6-prof ghc6-docs haskell-mode ghc6-libsrc.
You probably need libghc6-mtl-dev.
Thanks
Ian
___
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 08:21:09PM -0800, Corey O'Connor wrote:
Anytime I see the linker crash I get nervous. Any clues on where to start
debugging?
Is it deterministic? A hardware fault, e.g. bad RAM, seems likely to me.
Thanks
Ian
___
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 11:24:24PM +, Voldermort wrote:
I assume that porting an existing implementation would
be much easier than starting from scratch.
I doubt this is true, but even if it is I would prefer to see features
chosen based on their merits.
(I'm not familiar with the
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:15:08AM +0100, Christian Maeder wrote:
This would require to allow relative paths in package.conf files (which
would be useful, anyway). The wrapper scripts for ghc, ghci and ghc-pkg
could be easily rewritten.
I'm not sure if ranlib needs to be called, whenever
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 03:02:55PM +, C.M.Brown wrote:
Is there a way for GHC on OS X to find where it was run from, so that it
can find package.conf?
The command:
ghc --print-libdir
should do it.
But the way that knows what to print on unix machines is that ghc is a
shell
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 04:38:28PM -0500, Brian P. O'Hanlon wrote:
Hello, all. I successfully built GHC 6.8.1 on my FreeBSD 7.0_BETA
amd64 machine. I was able to bootstrap it from the GHC 6.6.1 for
FreeBSD 6/amd64 which was posted to this list a while ago (and was
running in FreeBSD 6
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 10:24:43PM +0100, Daniel Fischer wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 15. November 2007 09:57 schrieb Simon Peyton-Jones:
Urk. Well spotted!
I omitted a prime (writing env instead of env') in a late fix, and as a
result practically no top-level rules and specialisations are
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 05:17:37PM -, Claus Reinke wrote:
a lot of ghc-related discussion takes place on ghc's trac
wiki these days, as does the development of ghc docs.
so i'd like to follow wiki changes as an rss feed.
this is supported, according to
Hi Christian,
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 05:27:54PM +0100, Christian Maeder wrote:
I've also created a binary distribution of GHC 6.8.1 for Mac OS X 10.4
Thanks, I've added it to the download page.
Ian
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 07:55:51PM +0100, Johannes Waldmann wrote:
PS: indeed I just checked the docs and found -XDisambiguateRecordFields
Was this advertized?
It's in the 6.8.1 release notes (well, the -fdisambiguate-record-fields
flag is, but we should have advertised
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 05:11:05PM -0800, Stefan O'Rear wrote:
Perhaps someone with with a Trac login should make note
of them.
You have one! User 'guest', password 'guest'. In fact, it says this at
the bottom of every page! (Spammers are smart enough to try and create
accounts, but
Hi all,
It is now possible to register a new user account for yourself on the
GHC trac. To do so, make sure you are logged out and then click the
register link at the top-right, or go to this URL:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/register
Making your own account preferred over using the
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 11:13:26AM -0800, Greg Fitzgerald wrote:
On Windows, HUnit's assertions are not working - trace below in ghci 6.8.1and
6.6.1. Can others reproduce? Is this the right place to report bugs?
Should I confirm a bug here and then create a ticket, create a ticket and
that's
We are pleased to announce the Release Candidate phase for GHC 6.8.2.
Snapshots beginning with 6.8.1.20071206 are release candidates for 6.8.2
You can download snapshots from here:
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/stable/dist/
Right now we have the source bundles:
Hi Greg,
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 02:04:24PM -0800, Greg Fitzgerald wrote:
abc @=? efg
Loading package HUnit-1.2.0.0 ... linking ... done.
*** Exception: (unknown)
On Dec 3, 2007 7:23 AM, Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is caused by a change in the HUnit library, from
Hi Greg,
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 02:24:18PM -0800, Greg Fitzgerald wrote:
Please test as much as possible
One difference between 6.8.1 and 6.8.2 that I see is in running runhaskell
Setup.hs haddock with Haddock 0.8 on Windows XP. Haddock is no longer able
to resolve the names from the
=
The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 6.8.2
=
The GHC Team is pleased to announce a new patchlevel release of GHC.
This release contains a number of
Hi Manuel,
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 04:29:13PM +1100, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
Ian Lynagh wrote:
=
The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 6.8.2
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 12:11:17PM +1100, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
otool -L compiler/stage2/ghc-6.8.2
/opt/local/lib/libgmp.3.dylib (compatibility version 8.0.0,
current version 8.1.0)
Yes, it does. That's very strange for the *stage2* compiler. I ran
otool on pwd and
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 12:53:32PM +1100, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
It seems to be a matter of the precise ld call parameters whether the
gmp/ in the ghc repo is used or the external one. In using the stage1
compiler to link the stage2 compiler, the external one wins, but in
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 12:08:50PM +1100, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
I wrote,
Ian Lynagh wrote:
=
The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 6.8.2
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 08:44:23PM +0100, Christian Maeder wrote:
I've built binary distributions
Thanks! All added to the download page.
Ian
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 08:34:22AM +, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
| 4. A more radical change would be introducing hierarchical modules. This
| could be just a matter of renaming the directories to start with an upper
| case character and changing the import declarations. This gives module
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 06:03:50PM +0100, Christian Maeder wrote:
Christian Maeder wrote:
http://www.dfki.de/sks/hets/mac/versions/ghc-6.8.2-powerpc-apple-darwin.tar.bz2
http://www.dfki.de/sks/hets/intel-mac/versions/ghc-6.8.2-i386-apple-darwin.tar.bz2
Ian, could you replace the dists
Hi Chris,
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 03:38:58PM -0500, Chris Saunders wrote:
Will there be a binary release for Windows x86_64?
Unfortunately not in the near future; see this ticket for more details:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1884
Thanks
Ian
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 09:54:45PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
[Note: already shortly discussed with Wilhelm]
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 12:30:06PM +, Wilhelm B. Kloke wrote:
../../compiler/stage1/ghc-inplace -package-name unix-2.2.0.0
-hide-all-packages -i -idist/build/autogen
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 09:19:25AM -0800, Judah Jacobson wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 6:55 AM, Christian Maeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judah Jacobson wrote:
On Jan 5, 2008 10:29 AM, Thorkil Naur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The alternative is to use static linking of gmp (as suggested by chak)
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 11:38:21AM +0100, Christian Maeder wrote:
Simon Marlow wrote:
The i386 machine I use here for building the bindists is running a
rather old version of RedHat. I do intend to upgrade it at some point,
but it's entirely possible for someone else to build a bindist
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 11:34:08AM +0100, Christian Maeder wrote:
You may try my version built on:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ uname -a
Linux denebola 2.6.18.8-0.7-bigsmp #1 SMP Tue Oct 2 17:21:08 UTC 2007
i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
using: gcc version 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux)
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 11:23:59AM +0100, Wagner Ferenc wrote:
Ravi Nanavati [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well... I built some (not all) of the 6.8.2-related packages in
Haskell Unsafe on etch.
Ian uploaded 6.8.2 the day before
yesterday... Maybe when he's finished with this work, a
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 06:07:35PM +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 11:23:59AM +0100, Wagner Ferenc wrote:
Ian uploaded 6.8.2 the day before yesterday... Maybe when he's
finished with this work, a rebuild on Etch won't be too
Hi Serge,
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 03:58:14PM +0300, Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
main
in the ghci interpreter outputs something like this:
[([1, 2, 3), []),\n\n([4, 5, 6), [7]),\n\n([9, 8, 0],\n\n[0, 0, 0])]
It shouldn't do; can you give a complete example please?
1. If we give to
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 10:05:36PM +, C.M.Brown wrote:
Looks like your version of cabal is a bit old. Try updating to the 1.2.3
or 1.3 series. You can find it on hackage.haskell.org
I'm using the runghc command from ghc-6.8.2, is that right?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/filepath-1.0 $ which
Hi Marcus,
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 10:01:49PM +0100, Marcus D. Gabriel wrote:
code in libraries/base/Data/List.hs
for merge is
merge cmp xs [] = xs
merge cmp [] ys = ys
merge cmp [] ys = ys
merge cmp xs [] = xs
This actually came up a while ago, in this thread:
Hi Robin,
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 04:38:25PM +, Robin Houston wrote:
import qualified Data.IntSet as IntSet
main = print $ IntSet.empty
gives the errors:
/usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols:
___stginit_containerszm0zi1zi0zi1_DataziIntSet_
Hi all
I am confused by the GHC profiling output. I have put some abstracts
below to illustrate my confusion.
I compiled my code with:
HFLAGS=-Wall -package lang -prof -auto-all hmake -ghc main
and then ran it with:
./main -t +RTS -p test5.hs
Here is some of main.prof:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 06:42:52PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
p_aexp_list Parser 00.0 0.0 0.0 0.3
[...]
Now basically my problem is how things under p_aexp_list can be entered
896 times if p_aexp_list is entered 0 times - am I reading it wrong
601 - 700 of 1147 matches
Mail list logo
