[Posted to haskell-cafe, since it's getting quite off topic]
Kent Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
for a long time. 16 bit unicode should be gotten rid of, being the worst
of both worlds, non backwards compatable with ascii, endianness issues
and no constant length encoding utf8
- Original Message -
From: Ketil Malde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
for a long time. 16 bit unicode should be gotten rid of, being the worst
of both worlds, non backwards compatable with ascii, endianness issues
and no constant length encoding utf8 externally and utf32 when
worknig
Kent Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You have endianness issues, and you need to explicitly type text files
or insert BOMs.
You have to distinguish between the encoding form (what you use internally)
and encoding scheme (externally).
Good point, of course. Most of the arguments apply
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001 15:03:15 -0700 Ashley Yakeley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
At 2001-10-08 09:27, Diego Dainese wrote:
what are the reasons behind the rule stating that a type must not be
declared as an instance of a particular class, more than once in the
program?
It's so that the members
hello,
Why aren't instance declarations handled by the module system like
every other symbol, so that a module can decide when to import an
instance declaration and when to export it? Are there technical
difficulties with this approach?
i beleive the reason is that instances don't have
What is the rationale for when Haskell demands a = and when it demands
a -? Ideas that occur to me are:
(a) The distinction helps the parser a lot
(b) There's a semantic difference that the language's grammar is trying
to express that isn't obvious to me
-- Mark
Title: RE: Unicode support
-Original Message-
From: Ketil Malde [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
...
But as I said: they will not go away now, they are too
firmly established.
Yep. But it appears that the right choice for external encoding
scheme would be UTF-8.
You're free to
Está para sair a 22 de Outubro... até eu estou a ficar surpreendido com a
evolução destes tipos. Qd penso do 1o Linux que instalei (à cerca de dois
anos? - andava eu no 4o ano) sinto-me como aquelas velhas que dizem eu ainda
sou do tempo..., err... em que tinha de andar a alterar XF86Config à
I just accidently sent a mail written in portuguese about SuSE 7.3.
I'm really sorry, it will not happen again.
My apologies
J.A.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Iavor S. Diatchki wrote:
hello,
Why aren't instance declarations handled by the module system like
every other symbol, so that a module can decide when to import an
instance declaration and when to export it? Are there technical
difficulties with this approach?
i beleive the
At 2001-10-09 11:55, Mark Carroll wrote:
What is the rationale for when Haskell demands a = and when it demands
a -?
What? Example please...
--
Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 9 Oct 2001, Ashley Yakeley wrote:
At 2001-10-09 11:55, Mark Carroll wrote:
What is the rationale for when Haskell demands a = and when it
demands a -?
Okay, I can't give you anything formal, but here's my intuitive
understanding of things
12 matches
Mail list logo