Hello Piotr,
Monday, July 3, 2006, 10:27:22 AM, you wrote:
- syntax highlighting, including highlighting of bracket's pair
- fast access to help about identifier
- auto-indenting with user-tuned style
Personally I consider these 3 essential, so I'd vote for them to be
implemented in first
On 03/07/06, Bulat Ziganshin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i answer in cafe so that Thiago can see you preferences :)
Ups. That's that 'Replay to all' phenomena again ;)
smart indentation is not easy for Haskell, i think. I don't even sure
that myself has some strict indenting rules. moreover,
Bulat,
Thanks for the suggestions (by the way, very good article on IO). Some
comments below.
On 7/3/06, Bulat Ziganshin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- background compilation with errors highlighting
There is already some support for background compilation using GHC.
Error highlighting doesn't
Hello Pepe,
Monday, July 3, 2006, 2:15:59 PM, you wrote:
As you may know, this project was accepted for Google SoC and work started a
few weeks ago. There are now some observable results that can be tested, and
I have set up a wiki page at:
http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Ghci/Debugger
As we
Thiago Arrais wrote:
Bulat,
Thanks for the suggestions (by the way, very good article on IO). Some
comments below.
On 7/3/06, Bulat Ziganshin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- auto-indenting with user-tuned style
This one seems very challenging and interesting, not a must-have for
me but a very
Hi all,
I have a module Test.hs:
module Test where
import IO
readMsgFile = do
putStr Input file:
ifile - getLine
putStr Output file:
ofile - getLine
s - readFile ifile
writeFile ofile (test s)
--test function
test :: String - String
test s
|s
Sara,
--test function
test :: String - String
test s
|s == true = True
|s == false = False
|otherwise = []
Then, I run
*Test readMsgFile
Input file: test1.txt
Output file: result1.txt
The content of test1.txt is string true. So I expect the result in
result1.txt is
Hi Sara,
Just a guess, but your input file is probably true\n - with a
trailing newline. In fact, many text editors won't let you create a
file without that training newline.
Thanks
Neil
On 7/3/06, Sara Kenedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have a module Test.hs:
module Test where
Hello Thiago,
Monday, July 3, 2006, 4:18:01 PM, you wrote:
- background compilation with errors highlighting
There is already some support for background compilation using GHC.
Error highlighting doesn't still work as I'd like to, but is there
too.
now i'm using editor with just syntax
Are you use GHC library?
Not yet, but it may turn to be a very wise decision to make in the
future. EclipseFP is being written in Java, I wonder how the GHC
library would be accessed on such a environment. Need to take a look
at the paper.
I think the way to go is to call it via JNI. This
On 03/07/06, Stefan Holdermans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
test s
| ...
| ...
| otherwise = error $ The file contains: ++ s
Or perhaps,
...
| otherwise = error $ The file contains: ++ show s
Then all the newlines and other control characters will be printed in
Leif,
On 7/3/06, Leif Frenzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the way to go is to call it via JNI. This has worked fine for me
in the past on Windows with dlls
Although it required quite some glue code written in C, and it did not
look very pretty. Have you already taken a look at this thing
Concerning packages, Alex asks:
| We covered this extensively in the Cabal vs Haskell thread starting
| here:
http://www.haskell.org//pipermail/libraries/2005-April/003607.html
|
| You concluded it by saying on April 22:
|
|And this observation points towards a simpler solution: rather than
Hi,
I was experimenting with forall and higher rank types briefly, in particular:
x :: [forall a . a]
This is illegal because of:
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/type-extensions.html#universal-quantification
Which is fine, however its surprising to compare the error
On 03/07/06, Neil Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In normal Haskell, I tend to view [x] as equivalent to [(x)] (provided
that x is not a tuple) but in this case it has a different meaning -
albeit both are erronous meanings.
How would tuples make a difference?
--
-David House, [EMAIL
On 7/3/06, David House [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 03/07/06, Neil Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In normal Haskell, I tend to view [x] as equivalent to [(x)] (provided
that x is not a tuple) but in this case it has a different meaning -
albeit both are erronous meanings.
How would tuples
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 02:27:17PM +0100, David House wrote:
Hi all. I need a decent regex library and JRegex seems the perfect
choice: simple API, yet well-featured, as well as PCRE support. I want
to use it on a simple project which involves input files a little
larger than typical --
Another suggestion:
Put your strings in an ordered binary tree (other data structures might also
work here).
Make your Atom an encoding of the structure of the tree (resp. other
structure). This is logically a sequence of bits, 0 for left (less than), 1
for
right (greater than) - if you
Perhaps you could post a new entry page on our shootout wiki?
http://www.haskell.org/hawiki/ShootoutEntry
This makes it easier for people to keep contributing.
Cheers,
Don
daniel.is.fischer:
Am Sonntag, 2. Juli 2006 01:58 schrieb Brent Fulgham:
We recently began considering another
Bulat,
Thank you for the detailed responses. I apologize for not answering
before, I was waiting for a quieter time to be able to answer
properly.
On 7/3/06, Bulat Ziganshin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
now i'm using editor with just syntax highlighting and therefore i
wrote about things those
I have managed to call Haskell from Java on Linux -- I had to manually
invoke gcc for the linking step because ghc won't output a shared
object. It was very ugly indeed, but I can show you what I did if it
will help.
jvm-bridge also seems more developed now than when I was doing this, so
21 matches
Mail list logo
