While having a single standardised library is a nice goal, I think a
first step would be to highlight the current state and pros and cons
of the various options.
Perhaps we could at least have wiki pages with recommendations? So
that a potential user of some particular functionality - whether
On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 12:38 +0200, John Hughes wrote:
One thing I've observed repeatedly is that many students in later
years, who learned functional programming early, have a strong
impression that functional languages are only suitable for toy
programs. Of course, that's because in their
Bulat Ziganshin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
| Moreover, Haskell type classes supports inheritance. Run-time
| polymorphism together with inheritance are often seen as OOP
| distinctive points, so during long time i considered type classes as a
| form of OOP implementation. but that's wrong!
Hi,
I've just uploaded a package ('rlwrap') to cygwin that I like to use
with ghci. You can use it like this:
rlwrap ghcii.sh
and then you will use ghci as if it were readline aware (i.e., you can
press up arrow to get last typed lines etc.). 'rlwrap' is very stable
and I never had
Hi,
Does anyone know of a package for genetic programming for Haskell? I
tried some links from Haskell wiki and some I found on google, and found
many interesting papers, but none of them pointed to downloadable code.
Does anyone know where can I find a good implementation (even an
The Q Programming Language can do symbolic manipulation -- Haskell?
The Q Programming Language can do the following:
sqr X = X*X
==sqr 5
25
==sqr (X+1)
(X+1)*(X+1)
Can Haskell do symbolic manipulation?
Or are term-rewriting and the lambda calculus sufficiently far enough
apart concepts?
--
On 8/16/06, Casey Hawthorne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Q Programming Language can do symbolic manipulation -- Haskell?
The Q Programming Language can do the following:
sqr X = X*X
==sqr 5
25
==sqr (X+1)
(X+1)*(X+1)
Can Haskell do symbolic manipulation?
Or are term-rewriting and the
