David House wrote:
* What would be a compulsory feature list?
Ability to subscribe to forums by email and to post/followup by email.
Alternatively, or in addition, a two-way NNTP gateway.
(If you want us forum-allergic to participate in the discussions there,
that is.)
| I'm working on a project for which the solution is highly
| parallelizable. I've been writing it so far for GHC as a
single-threaded
| app. I'd like to be able to split the job into multiple pieces, and
| spawn different system threads for each piece, so they will run on
| separate CPUs. Either
Andreas, Nikunj, and others
I don't have any experience of using GHC to build XLLs, or getting VBA
to call Haskell via a DLL. However, this is something we'd like to be
easy and reliable using GHC. If any of you are experts on the VBA/DLL
side of the question, and can figure out what we should
On 23.09 15:00, Adam Langley wrote:
Erlang's bit syntax[1] is a great for building and breaking up binary
structures. I've knocked up something similar (although a little
clumsy) for Haskell:
http://www.imperialviolet.org/binary/bitsyntax/
I don't think GHC is to blame in this case. If you follow all the
API (ABI) guidelines for building XLLs things work fine.
But there's a lot of things to get right.
-- Lennart
On Sep 25, 2006, at 05:16 , Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
Andreas, Nikunj, and others
I don't have any
Hi,
3GLs: programming based on algorithms (C, Java, ...)
There are algorithms in Haskell
4GSs: domain-specific languages (SQL,...)
There are plenty of domain specific languages in Haskell, I'd call
Parsec one of them
5GLs: automatic problem solving (Mathematica, Prolog,...)
I wouldn't
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Ch. A. Herrmann wrote:
Dear Haskellers,
do you think that Haskell is a 3GL (third generation language) or a 5GL or
that the hierarchy of programming language generations is useless?
I see a problem if the potential of a language is evaluated according to
the
Hi,
and/or visual programming (Visual Basic,...)
I can only assume you are a) joking
a bit, yes
, or b) not a visual basic user.
also true
While Visual Basic is a much insulted language, I have a soft spot for
it. However, its not a Visual programming language - its a
Hi,
Henning Thielemann wrote:
assembly language (Assembler ist deutsch :-)
for mysterious reasons it entered the English world.
3GLs: programming based on algorithms (C, Java, ...)
4GSs: domain-specific languages (SQL,...)
5GLs: automatic problem solving (Mathematica, Prolog,...)
Hallo,
On 9/25/06, Ch. A. Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Henning Thielemann wrote:
assembly language (Assembler ist deutsch :-)
for mysterious reasons it entered the English world.
'Assembly' is a language. 'Assembler' is a program.
--
-alex
http://www.ventonegro.org/
Ch == Ch A Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ch Hi,
Hello,
I'd say very strong, lots of times a where is used thats making
use of laziness.
Ch I don't agree: where is often only used to program in a top-down
Ch style
I would say in a more declarative style, the where is closer to thinking
Bernie Pope answered:
1. Why do the rules of the monomorphism restriction explicitly mention
*simple* pattern bindings?
Where is the difference, especially as there is a translation to
simple pattern bindings?
Why should
p | a==b = 2
| otherwise = 3
be
Alex Queiroz wrote:
On 9/25/06, Ch. A. Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henning Thielemann wrote:
assembly language (Assembler ist deutsch :-)
for mysterious reasons it entered the English world.
'Assembly' is a language. 'Assembler' is a program.
All this is absolutely
Hello Ch.,
Monday, September 25, 2006, 5:14:15 PM, you wrote:
do you think that Haskell is a 3GL (third generation language) or a 5GL or
it's a BottomthGL language :)
--
Best regards,
Bulatmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
On 9/24/06, David House [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.The recent thread on email vs. forums inspired a bit of interest toget some forum software on haskell.org. Were we to go ahead with this,I think it'd be great to have this software written in Haskell itself.
If you were to write all-new
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 16:50 +0200, Jerzy Karczmarczuk wrote:
. . .
(For the CDC mainframes the assembly language was called Compass
[Comprehensive Assembler]. It was a 7648764GL. You could program
in it almost like in Lisp thanks to some very exquisite macros,
and add another set of macros
Planning Systems, Inc. has a job opportunity for Haskell programmers.
My synopsis is below, and the official description is at
http://www.plansys.com/careers/job_details.cfm?JobID=28
Write Haskell code for a US government contractor. Projects include a
high-assurance authorization system build
On 9/25/06, Brian Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/24/06, David House [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
The recent thread on email vs. forums inspired a bit of interest to
get some forum software on haskell.org. Were we to go ahead with this,
I think it'd be great to have this software
Ch == Ch A Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
it's a BottomthGL language :)
Ch That's a religious statement. I was looking for some strong
Ch arguments for the nonbelievers that Haskell is a 5GL.
But what about nonbelievers in language classification by generation?
As already mentioned you
Max Vasin wrote:
Ch == Ch A Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
it's a BottomthGL language :)
Ch That's a religious statement. I was looking for some strong
Ch arguments for the nonbelievers that Haskell is a 5GL.
But what about nonbelievers in language classification
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 24.09.2006, 13:02 +0100 schrieb David House:
* What would be a compulsory feature list?
Stating the obvious: Haskell Syntax Highlighting (I didn't see it
mentioned before, but that might be because of malaria)
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim nomeata Breitner
mail: [EMAIL
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 22:22 +0200, Christoph Herrmann wrote:
. . .
What Prolog really provides concerning automatic problem solving
is little: equation solving in term algebra; you can simulate that
in Haskell without much effort. On the other hand, I saw Haskell
classified as a 3GL. The
Nikunj,
The symptoms that you describe hint at some incorrect pointer handling.
I believe the culprit is that pesky BSTR. I will try to dig up the code
that
I wrote a while ago to pass a BSTR to Haskell.
Meanwhile, another hint. The GHC FAQ 1.4.1 says:
For utterly horrible reasons, programs
23 matches
Mail list logo
