This is ghc 6.6. Anyone else seeing this?
not here.
what do these output:
ghc --version
and
ghci --version
? are they different?
besides that.. why do you use 6.6? may it bee.. is your Unix-like OS sth
between OSX and linux? (i remenber there exists a Gnu/Darwin package manager
without the
| abi compatibility would be very nice to have (if the library/binding
| code
| doesn't change, newer ghc major versions should still be able to link
| to
| bindings compiled with older ones). that is only going to become more
| important as fewer libraries are going to be shipped with ghc itself
That is all true. ABI compatibility would be nice. But I don't see how
to combine with GHC's other goals. Notably, we frequently add new
information to interface files, and it would be a major constraint not to
be able to do so.
that is the bit i never quite understood: if newer formats
I'm not sure if you're talking about C++ ABIs or C ABIs? If you're already
using a C ABI, and you're getting incompatibilities, well I have nothing
useful to say :-)
If you're talking about C++ ABIs, technically it's possible to use a
Generator to drop-down into a C ABI, pump across the
Hi Bulat,
can anyone provide wxHaskell already compiled/compilable with ghc 6.6.1 on
Windows?
This is precisely the reason I switched to Gtk2Hs - Duncan provides
Windows installers as each new GHC release comes out. If wxHaskell
wants to stand any chance as an alternative GUI framework there
Hi all,
The following lines of code:
import GHC
main :: [PackageIdentifier] - IO ()
main pkgs
= GHC.defaultErrorHandler defaultDynFlags $
do GHC.init (Just GHC_LIBDIR)
interactive pkgs
seemingly worked in GHC 6.6 but they do not work in 6.6.1 anymore with
error message:
[1
Hello,
This may be a bit off topic, but maybe someone here has importante related
information. I am running Kubuntu, the lattests stable version, but I am
running unstable Haskell packages, that is, I fetch the dsc, diff and
tarballs and build the debs myself of what will come in the next
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 07:23:37PM +0100, Andrew Coppin wrote:
As for robust... it tiles windows. What could possibly go wrong?
I'm told that early versions of DWM had a habit of segfaulting if you
looked at them wrong. Just usual C stuff. Which in a normal setup,
will cause the rest of your
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 04:16:29AM -0500, Ben wrote:
hi folks --
a haskell newbie here, searching for comments and wisdom on my code.
i had a project to try to implement external sort in haskell as a
learning exercise. (external sort is sorting a list that is too large
to fit in main
