On 9/30/07, Peter Verswyvelen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is of course very easy to do manually, but does a command line tool
exist for extracting source code from literate Haskell files?
There are a lot of good answers already. You can also use some GHC
command line options.
Please see:
Hi folks
(For those of you at ICFP, my best regards and humblest apologies! I
have unavoidable and troublesome distractions which keep me within
the UK, but at quite a high average speed.)
On 30 Sep 2007, at 15:58, Felipe Almeida Lessa wrote:
On 9/30/07, PR Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
f x = x + x
Is the x use to create a pattern in the definition and when f is
called it's replaced by a value?
What's actually happening here?
Thanks, Paul
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
PR Stanley wrote:
Hi
f x = x + x
Is the x use to create a pattern in the definition and when f is
called it's replaced by a value?
Basically, uh, yeah.
If you say f 5, this is basically equivilent to 5 + 5 by the above
definition.
(I'm sure a huge number of others will chime in on this
PR Stanley:
f x = x + x
Is the x use to create a pattern in the definition and when f is
called it's replaced by a value?
Those equation-like definitions are syntactic sugar for lambda
abstractions. f could as well be defined as f = \x - x + x.
___
f x = x + x
Is the x use to create a pattern in the definition and when f is
called it's replaced by a value?
Those equation-like definitions are syntactic sugar for lambda
abstractions. f could as well be defined as f = \x - x + x.
Please elaborate
If you've never been exposed to lambda calculus, then you're in for a
real treat! There is no shortage of tutorials on this.
If Greek letters and symbol manipulations are not your thing, take a
look at http://worrydream.com/AlligatorEggs/ which describes a game
that teaches children about
On 10/1/07, PR Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
f x = x + x
Is the x use to create a pattern in the definition and when f is
called it's replaced by a value?
Those equation-like definitions are syntactic sugar for lambda
abstractions. f could as well be defined as f = \x - x + x.
Hello,
I have just read the thread about installation of GLUT package started
at 9/3/2007 by Ronald Guida. Installation of the GLFW package is very
much related to that. However, I haven't found the solution for
installing the GLFW successsfully.
I have downloaded
Dear all,
I'm getting a rather unfriendly error when trying to load a plugin
with hs-plugins:
my_program: Ix{Int}.index: Index (65536) out of range ((0,7))
The exact numbers in the message vary depending on what I'm trying to
do. I'm using GHC-6.6.1 on MacOS X. Here are three files that
By the way, this was with hs-plugins-1.0-rc1. I appear to be unable to
install hs-plugins-0.9.10 now (perhaps because of 1.0-rc1). In case it
helps this is the not so pretty output from doing a make check in
1.0rc1:
=== testing testsuite/conf/simple ... ===
testing
Sorry for the long delay, work has been really busy...
On Sep 27, 2007, at 12:25 PM, Aaron Denney wrote:
On 2007-09-27, Aaron Denney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, not so much. As Duncan mentioned, it's a matter of what the
most
common case is. UTF-16 is effectively fixed-width for the
On Oct 1, 2007, at 21:59 , Björn Buckwalter wrote:
Dear all,
I'm getting a rather unfriendly error when trying to load a plugin
with hs-plugins:
my_program: Ix{Int}.index: Index (65536) out of range ((0,7))
This tends to mean that hs-plugins doesn't understand the format of
the .hi
I had a similar problem, I solved it by using the development version of
hs-plugins (ie. darcs get --set-scripts-executable
http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~dons/code/hs-plugins)
On 02/10/2007, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 1, 2007, at 21:59 , Björn Buckwalter wrote:
14 matches
Mail list logo