On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 6:22 PM, PJ Durai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do have the import library. It came with the DLL. It links properly
when I use CCALL on the haskell import statements. Doesnt link when I
use STDCALL. It looks for function name with something like '@4 or
@8' tacked on at
Felipe Lessa wrote:
Hi,
I tried googling and searching the haskellwiki about this but wasn't
lucky enough. My question is: is there a way to send struct arguments
to C functions via the FFI or do I need to create a C wrapper? I guess
there isn't, and while I can live without it, I'd like to
Adrian Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
while studying for a exam I came across this little pearl:
Y = (L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L)
where
L = λabcdefghijklmnopqstuvwxyzr. (r (t h i s i s a f i x e d
p o i n t c o m b i n a t o r))
posted by Cale
At Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:27:59 -0400,
Jeff Polakow wrote:
[1 text/plain; US-ASCII (7bit)]
[2 text/html; US-ASCII (7bit)]
Hello,
data LSet t where
Nil :: LSet Nil
Ins :: (Member a t b
, If b t (a ::: t) r)
= L a - LSet t - LSet r
Try replacing both
Hi I am learnig Haskell form SOE book, but I can't find out how to import SOE
module. I use eclipsefp IDE and I get no error when I have SOE.hs in my
project and in SimpleGraphics.hs I make import SOE. But when trying to run
it I get error: Could not find module `SOE': Use -v to see a list of the
Actually I have already found the way how to do it but not in eclipsefp.
Either I run ghci and when both modules are in the same dir it works or I
use -idirs but in eclipsefp it doesn't. Can somebody help me how to
configure eclipsefp. I don't want to go to command prompt every time I want
to run
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 22:45 -0300, Felipe Lessa wrote:
Hi,
I tried googling and searching the haskellwiki about this but wasn't
lucky enough. My question is: is there a way to send struct arguments
to C functions via the FFI or do I need to create a C wrapper? I guess
there isn't, and
fero wrote:
Actually I have already found the way how to do it but not in eclipsefp.
Either I run ghci and when both modules are in the same dir it works or I
use -idirs but in eclipsefp it doesn't. Can somebody help me how to
configure eclipsefp. I don't want to go to command prompt every time
It works when I put -idirs c:\eworkspace2\Soe\src\SOE to extra compiler
options and set GHCi to use GHC setting, but you need to restart ecpilse.
And the module, wht is loaded is SOE so I always need to switch module..
Fero
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 1:18 PM, fero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
i've attached an example program which seems to indicate that the
magnitude function from Data.Complex is very slow compared to a more
naive implementation (for Complex Float). on my machine (intel core2
duo, osx 10.4) the CPU time using the library function is about 6-7
times as
If the struct is passed by reference of course then you're fine, but if
it's by value then you need a C wrapper. The reason is because it's
beyond the scope of the FFI to know the structure layout and how to map
that to haskell types. That's the domain of FFI pre-processors. However
I don't know
Hello,
Thanks. This sort of works, but shifts the problem to another context.
Now it
seems that I can't hide the extra type information in the existential
types, which is what I want to do.
I think that you can't abstract over a type context, i.e. you can't expect
type inference to
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, stefan kersten wrote:
i've attached an example program which seems to indicate that the magnitude
function from Data.Complex is very slow compared to a more naive
implementation (for Complex Float). on my machine (intel core2 duo, osx 10.4)
the CPU time using the library
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Duncan Coutts
Sent: 17 July 2008 12:46
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 22:45 -0300, Felipe Lessa wrote:
Hi,
I tried googling and searching the haskellwiki about this but wasn't
lucky enough. My question is: is there a way to send
An abstraction stack:
Impure Pure
How about strict vs. lazy? I ask because I assumed there were lazy
variants of uvector or storablevector, using the bytestring list of
chunks approach, but apparently not? Making a lazy version seems
pretty easy, but rewriting all the basic
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Evan Laforge wrote:
An abstraction stack:
Impure Pure
How about strict vs. lazy? I ask because I assumed there were lazy
variants of uvector or storablevector, using the bytestring list of
chunks approach, but apparently not?
For storablevector there
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 05:18:01PM +0200, Henning Thielemann wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, stefan kersten wrote:
i've attached an example program which seems to indicate that the
magnitude function from Data.Complex is very slow compared to a more naive
implementation (for Complex Float).
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:08 PM, kyra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, but programmer *knows* the structure layout, so she usually can emulate
it with a sequence of primary ffi type arguments. It's pretty trivial for
the original example (see my previous post on this subj) and can be extended
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Bayley, Alistair
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- inline your *vect-vect wrapper (ends up in generated .c file)
#def void funcWrapper(vect *v) { func(*v); }
foreign import stdcall funcWr unsafe funcWrapper :: VectorC - IO ()
I am using hsc2hs currently, but
On 17.07.2008, at 17:42, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 05:18:01PM +0200, Henning Thielemann wrote:
Complex.magnitude must prevent overflows, that is, if you just square
1e200::Double you get an overflow, although the end result may be
also
around 1e200. I guess, that to this end
Evan Laforge wrote:
An abstraction stack:
Impure Pure
How about strict vs. lazy? I ask because I assumed there were lazy
variants of uvector or storablevector, using the bytestring list of
chunks approach, but apparently not?
wait list of chunks makes something that
Hello everyone,
I have this piece of code I've been working on, and I've been stuck on
tracking down a space leak in it for some time now. The code is
essentially a tight loop that updates a rather largish data structure
with embedded functions that are called by the driver loop. The code
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Peter Gavin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone,
I have this piece of code I've been working on, and I've been stuck on
tracking down a space leak in it for some time now. The code is essentially
a tight loop that updates a rather largish data structure
On 17.07.2008, at 17:18, Henning Thielemann wrote:
i've attached an example program which seems to indicate that the
magnitude function from Data.Complex is very slow compared to a
more naive implementation (for Complex Float). on my machine
(intel core2 duo, osx 10.4) the CPU time using
If scaleFloat and exponent are implemented with bit twiddling they can
be quite fast.
I have a feeling that they involve slow FFI calls in GHC (being the
original author of a lot of the code involved).
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 8:21 PM, stefan kersten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 17.07.2008, at
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 05:18:01PM +0200, Henning Thielemann wrote:
Complex.magnitude must prevent overflows, that is, if you just square
1e200::Double you get an overflow, although the end result may be also
around 1e200. I guess, that to this end
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, stefan kersten wrote:
On 17.07.2008, at 17:18, Henning Thielemann wrote:
i've attached an example program which seems to indicate that the
magnitude function from Data.Complex is very slow compared to a more naive
implementation (for Complex Float). on my machine (intel
Peter, from 500 feet, we can't see much, but your strictness might
actually be your problem depending on what largish looks like and
whether you're reading your data from disc. It's entirely possible
that your data structure updates or disc reads are head-strict and
you're evaluating or loading
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Peter Gavin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
evaluated anywhere. I've used retainer profiling, and the functions that
are leaking space according to the profiler output are strict throughout.
Have you looked at the Core code generated? That might show something that
Felipe Lessa wrote:
Hi,
I tried googling and searching the haskellwiki about this but wasn't
lucky enough. My question is: is there a way to send struct arguments
to C functions via the FFI or do I need to create a C wrapper? I guess
there isn't, and while I can live without it, I'd like to
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 13:36 -0300, Felipe Lessa wrote:
I am using hsc2hs currently, but googling about #def with Cabal I
found out that some people were having trouble to make Cabal discover
that hsc2hs had created a new C file. Specifically, bug #245 [1] which
says that the milestone is
Thanks for the responses.
This is basically what I've got looks like (grossly simplified):
data Monad m = Foo m a b =
Foo
{ action :: m (Foo m a b, b)
, update :: a - Foo m a b
}
The driver loop injects new values with update, and executes action
whenever it's ready to,
Replying to myself...
Interesting. I removed all the bangs other than the obvious loop
variables, and all the uses of seq that I had inserted, and there's
still no leak.
Does anyone know why the leak would disappear when GHC is using IO other
than a generic (unspecified) monad? Is there
33 matches
Mail list logo
