Duncan Coutts [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It would be useful if some darcs 2 hackers, contributors could help the
ghc people evaluate if darcs 2 is still in the running.
This looks like a very easy and low-investement way to get involved.
Expanding a bit on this: The page at
1) Ideally I could parse stuff lazily. I have tried this with FTP and
it is more complex than it seems at first, due to making sure you
never, never, never consume too much data.
PolyParse has lazy variants of its combinators, which would probably be
of use here.
Software:
Hi,
what is currently the recommend way to interface with COM from haskell?
I need to create an Excel Sheet and thus need to use Excel via COM.
Günther
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
wren ng thornton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[Bug trackers are an excellent source of tasks for active developers to
use so things don't get lost, but they're awful for new developers. For
someone just joining the project it's rarely clear how important a task
is, how hard, or how far
-- Haddock 2.2.1
A new version of Haddock, the Haskell documentation tool, is out.
The homepage will be updated soon, containing a windows binary release.
Please use the bug tracker to submit bug reports
Günther Schmidt пишет:
Hi,
what is currently the recommend way to interface with COM from haskell?
I need to create an Excel Sheet and thus need to use Excel via COM.
Günther
You have the HDirect package, you need some tweaking to compile it with
the current GHC.
I only have a professionnal
What about the idea of creating a GUI interface to darcs? I love the
command line as much as the next guy, but I think darcs could really
benefit from a polished GUI. I used tortoise darcs on a small project
a while ago and it was pretty nice, but I think there is potential for
much better.
I
It would be useful if some darcs 2 hackers, contributors could help the
ghc people evaluate if darcs 2 is still in the running. That would mean
identifying the key bugs (eg windows case-insensitive file bugs, slow
pulls) and seeing how hard they are to fix. Also doing a test conversion
to darcs 2
Could darcs 2 performance be improved by making use of the
order of patches in the reference repo, to identify reference
versions and reign in exponential permutation issues? In other
words, all repos are equal, all patches are equal, but once a patch has made the
roundtrip through the reference
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Fernand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you need to simply create and Excel Sheet, you may also try it using the
new Microsoft XML format (it will only work with Office 2007, though) ; then
you do not need COM.
Sincerely yours,
Fernand
Hi Fernand and Günther,
A
Ooops, I just realized that hpaste truncated my source file at 5k
(it's 8k long). Unfortunately the Excel file creation code is in the
truncated part of the file ;-)
So if you are interested in getting the full source, just ask.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing
On Aug 2, 2008, at 19:26 PM, Jason Dusek wrote:
Eric Kow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would contribute to darcs if only...
...there were interest in binary file handling.
I'm interested in binary file handling.
But what do you mean -- do you want darcs to do some kind of binary
deltas
On 2008 Aug 4, at 6:10, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
A283 SEARCH {4} {21}
TEXTstring not in mailbox
Assuming the first line can be read strictly, and the remainder should
be lazy, the parser might look something like this:
FWIW, the actual data looks more like
A283 SEARCH {4}
TEXT
{21}
zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason Dusek wrote:
Eric Kow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would contribute to darcs if only...
...there were interest in binary file handling.
...what do you mean -- do you want darcs to do some kind of
binary deltas and then merge them? Sounds crazy.
http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/haddock-2.2.1
depends on ghc-paths
http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/ghc-paths-0.1.0.2
ghc-paths failed for me with:
Setup.hs:7:7:
Could not find module `Distribution.Simple.PackageIndex':
I've ghc-6.8.3 and
On 2008.08.04 19:32:13 +0200, Christian Maeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled
3.0K characters:
http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/haddock-2.2.1
depends on ghc-paths
http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/ghc-paths-0.1.0.2
ghc-paths failed for me with:
On 8/3/08, Andrew Appleyard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi PJ,
On 2/08/2008 4:09 AM, you wrote:
I am having issues getting hdbc/odbc working on windows.
When using GHC, I am not able to compile a simple program. It ends up
with linker errors like
[...]
Is there an easy workaround for
Right,
http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/Cabal-1.4.0.1
works.
It seems that the dependencies for ghc-paths could be improved.
Thanks Christian
Gwern Branwen wrote:
On 2008.08.04 19:32:13 +0200, Christian Maeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled
3.0K characters:
Hi,
I'm familiar with the capitalization rules for identifiers in Haskell
and know that they are very useful and practical e.g. by allowing
variables to be distinguished from constants in patterns etc.
However I'm trying to understand on a much deeper level whether or not
they can really be
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 19:51 +0100, Brian Hulley wrote:
Hi,
I'm familiar with the capitalization rules for identifiers in Haskell
and know that they are very useful and practical e.g. by allowing
variables to be distinguished from constants in patterns etc.
However I'm trying to understand
On 2008.08.04 20:47:12 +0200, Christian Maeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled
1.1K characters:
Right,
http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/Cabal-1.4.0.1
works.
It seems that the dependencies for ghc-paths could be improved.
Thanks Christian
Yes, I emailed Marlow
=
Call for Participation
The 13th ACM SIGPLAN International Conference
on Functional Programming (ICFP 2008)
http://www.icfpconference.org/icfp2008
Jonathan Cast wrote:
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 19:51 +0100, Brian Hulley wrote:
For example, why is there any distinction between a type variable and
a type constant?
forall a b. (a - b) - List a - List b
Now this begs the question: why does List need to start with a
capital? (supposing
Working with HOpenGL and GLUT, I find myself approaching a common
problem with a common solution that I don't really like all that much,
as it reeks of procedural programming. Basically the problem is that
of complex program state, such that when the user provides input to
the program in the form
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 23:04 +0100, Brian Hulley wrote:
Jonathan Cast wrote:
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 19:51 +0100, Brian Hulley wrote:
For example, why is there any distinction between a type variable and
a type constant?
forall a b. (a - b) - List a - List b
Now this begs the
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 10:13 PM, Tim Newsham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone interested in critiquing some code? I'm looking for ideas
for making it faster and/or simpler:
http://www.thenewsh.com/%7Enewsham/store/Server5.hs
The code looks fairly reasonable, although most of your strictness
You should try profiling this. I can see a few possible problems (such
as reading String from a socket, instead of a ByteString), but it's
difficult to predict what might be causing your code to be so slow.
Haskell code ought to be much more competitive with C for an
application like this.
I
On 2008 Aug 4, at 23:45, Tim Newsham wrote:
Anyway, I haven't yet used any ByteString IO functions. I ran
some tests when I was starting and it seems that using Handle IO
functions was a bit slower than using the Socket IO functions
directly.
It looks like there are a bunch of Handle IO
28 matches
Mail list logo
