On 24/10/09 23:08, Iain Barnett wrote:
[..]
If you're in business, you're trying to keep your costs lower than your
income. That means that a language with a stable code base, good/many
libraries, and a large pool of developers is a good choice.
I'm not sure it necessarily means that. There
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 10:04:23PM -0200, Maurício CA wrote:
Something like 'CComplex CDouble' has been proposed before...
I know, I started most of the discussions :)
The wiki says before asking for a ticket I should try to talk
about it in the mailing list. My attempts never got much
http://www.haskell.org/hoogle/ is VERY great for haskeller. However, i feel
hoogle should be improved by providing more examples as :
isInfixOf :: Eq a = [a] - [a] - Bool
The isInfixOf function takes two lists and returns True iff the first list
is contained, wholly and intact, anywhere within
This is not a job for Hoogle, it's for library documenters.
However, that might be a good suggestion for haddock: introduce a
input/output examples haddock field and present it in hoogle
results. That, however, will only be useful if many library authors
use this feature.
2009/10/25 zaxis
Hi Curt,
Thanks for the tips. Looks like return () would be a good candidate for that
null statement I was seeking earlier.
Michael
--- On Sun, 10/25/09, Curt Sampson c...@starling-software.com wrote:
From: Curt Sampson c...@starling-software.com
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Is there a null
Hi
just starting out on haskell so thought I'd try and install a few packages.
from unix-2.3.2.0:
$ runhaskell Setup.hs configure
checking target system type... i686-pc-cygwin
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating unix.buildinfo
config.status: creating
On 2009-10-25 02:46 -0700 (Sun), zaxis wrote:
However, i feel hoogle should be improved by providing more examples...
On 2009-10-25 12:55 +0300 (Sun), Eugene Kirpichov wrote:
This is not a job for Hoogle, it's for library documenters.
What he said.
But zaxis, here's another thing to look
On 2009-10-25 04:58 + (Sun), Iain Barnett wrote:
...
Ok, let me sum up the basic, serious points first, and then I'll get
into the fun usenet-style tit-for-tat afterwards.
No web application doing significant traffic is running on Rails as
you'd roll it out by installing the appropriate
On 25 Oct 2009, at 08:31, Magnus Therning wrote:
Also, as I'm sure you've found out re libraries, more isn't
necessarily
better.
Definitely. Choice can become a real pain, especially in the face of
lacking documentation.
I'd argue that many, if not most, commonly used libraries
Curt,
I really do think you should lay off characterising other people's
comments. If you want clarification ask for it or ask a question. I
never said Haskell was failing, for example, but I would like an
example of it succeeding in the area that Ruby is being so heavily
criticised for.
Fellow Haskellers,
I'm happy to announce the release of haskell-mode 2.5.
* By web: http://projects.haskell.org/haskellmode-emacs/
* By darcs: http://code.haskell.org/haskellmode-emacs/
Furthermore, there is a change of maintainer; if you have
issues, you should now contact me instead of Stefan
2009/10/25 Svein Ove Aas svein@aas.no:
Fellow Haskellers,
I'm happy to announce the release of haskell-mode 2.5.
* By web: http://projects.haskell.org/haskellmode-emacs/
* By darcs: http://code.haskell.org/haskellmode-emacs/
Furthermore, there is a change of maintainer; if you have
On 2009-10-25 14:48 + (Sun), Iain Barnett wrote:
On 25 Oct 2009, at 08:31, Magnus Therning wrote:
Also, as I'm sure you've found out re libraries, more isn't
necessarily better.
Definitely. Choice can become a real pain, especially in the face of
lacking documentation.
Or if the
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Svein Ove Aas svein@aas.no wrote:
Fellow Haskellers,
I'm happy to announce the release of haskell-mode 2.5.
Thank you for stepping up, Svein! Also thanks to Stefan for
maintaining haskell-mode for so long. I updated the Wiki entry:
On 25/10/09 14:48, Iain Barnett wrote:
On 25 Oct 2009, at 08:31, Magnus Therning wrote:
I'd argue that many, if not most, commonly used libraries are
excellent for common tasks, but as soon as you go into a niche many fall
short of your requirements for scalability, speed, resource usage,
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Paulo Tanimoto tanim...@arizona.edu wrote:
I updated the Wiki entry:
http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Haskell_mode_for_Emacs
with your name and download links. Can you check if it's OK? I
wasn't sure which of your email addresses to use. On a side note,
Magnus == Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org writes:
Magnus Again, in my own experience the amount of work to find a
Magnus good developer is about the same, and sometimes stacked in
Magnus favour of using an obscure language.
I would be inclined to agree with you.
Coming from the
Hello Colin,
Sunday, October 25, 2009, 7:59:54 PM, you wrote:
developers, I would probably find it very difficult indeed to find
another job as an Eiffel developer, so I would have to look elsewhere,
Haskell developers have another risk - they may be considered as
overqualified for doing
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Svein Ove Aas svein@aas.no wrote:
It looks fine, ignoring the mess. :P
While you're at it, you might want to copy the minimal setup from
what is described in the README, i.e. including the indentation setup.
Or not, if you wish; I'll leave that to your
Hi Eugene,
here are some answers:
I'm mainly interested in the following:
- What supercompilers do exist, except for the ones mentioned above?
We have prototype implementations of supercompilers for both GHC and
the Timber compiler, but they are not yet in a suitable form for
public
Thanks you very much Peter, that helped quite a lot!
I'll be looking into all the material you provided.
2009/10/25 Peter A. Jonsson p...@csee.ltu.se:
Hi Eugene,
here are some answers:
I'm mainly interested in the following:
- What supercompilers do exist, except for the ones mentioned
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Svein Ove Aas svein@aas.no wrote:
Fellow Haskellers,
I'm happy to announce the release of haskell-mode 2.5.
* By web: http://projects.haskell.org/haskellmode-emacs/
* By darcs: http://code.haskell.org/haskellmode-emacs/
Make that 2.5.1. There were some
Hello,
I'm happy to announce the first release of the attempt package[1]. It is
meant to solve the how should I represent a failure issue. It is based on
extensible exceptions and provides a monad, a monad transformers and helper
functions to replace many standard, unsafe functions like head.
Philippos Apolinarius phi50...@yahoo.ca writes:
Thank you for your help. I am sure that you are right as to the cause
of the problem. However, I do not know what I should do to solve
it. The Haskell program is generated by LaTeX macros. It is useless
to import System.IO.UTF8. I did it.
Are
2009/10/25 Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org:
On 24/10/09 23:08, Iain Barnett wrote:
If you're in business, you're trying to keep your costs
lower than your income. That means that a language with a
stable code base, good/many libraries, and a large pool of
developers is a good choice.
Something like 'CComplex CDouble' has been proposed before...
2) Since all (few) answers were favorable, should I ask for a
ticket to be created? How?
Well, before trying to get it standardized, you need to get it
implemented and tested by at least one compiler to explore the
design space
Hi,
In case of this:
case bala of
[ bala
, bala
, bala ] - bala bala bala
_ - bala
ghc 6.10.4 would fail to compile, because of the wrong indent of
line , bala.
--
竹密岂妨流水过
山高哪阻野云飞
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://xmonad.org
The xmonad dev team is pleased to announce xmonad 0.9!
We think this is a great release.
The headlines:
* Actions.SpawnOn: Windows go to the workspace they were launched
on, even if you're no longer viewing that workspace. Especially
Is there a way to embed a Haskell interpreter/compiler in a browser.
I think this would be a safer language than JavaScript.
--
Regards,
Casey
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Translating Fortran mixed mode arithmetic
expressions into Haskell is quite a challenge.
Believe it or not
c=10.**(11-int(alog10(r)+10))
translates to
let c = (**) 10.0 $ fromIntegral $ subtract 11 $ truncate $ (+) (logBase 10.0
r) 10.0
I finally broke the expression below into two parts
(k1
Am Montag 26 Oktober 2009 03:39:13 schrieb Magicloud Magiclouds:
Hi,
In case of this:
case bala of
[ bala
, bala
, bala ] - bala bala bala
_ - bala
ghc 6.10.4 would fail to compile, because of the wrong indent of
line , bala.
Yes. It must, because the `of' opens a new layout
Am Montag 26 Oktober 2009 04:21:06 schrieb michael rice:
Translating Fortran mixed mode arithmetic
expressions into Haskell is quite a challenge.
Believe it or not
c=10.**(11-int(alog10(r)+10))
translates to
let c = (**) 10.0 $ fromIntegral $ subtract 11 $ truncate $ (+) (logBase
10.0 r)
Hi Daniel,
I guess I only accidentally got the right answer for c=
For my r value of 60.0
*Main truncate $ (+) (logBase 10.0 60.0) 10.0
11
*Main
and subtract 11 11 == 0
Thanks for correcting me.
Also missed that 11-10=1 simplification. Forest for the trees stuff.
Your translation's
Ah, I see.
The reason I have to use my style is the same as others: the list is
too long
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Daniel Fischer
daniel.is.fisc...@web.de wrote:
Am Montag 26 Oktober 2009 03:39:13 schrieb Magicloud Magiclouds:
Hi,
In case of this:
case bala of
[ bala
,
34 matches
Mail list logo
