On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 7:47 AM, David Sankel cam...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm wondering if a monetary incentive would keep the person who does this
work more accountable. I personally would be willing to contribute to
continue getting this service. I wonder if there are others as well.
I don't
While I would not be opposed to being paid, I don't think it's at all
necessary or even really appropriate. I liken the job to volunteering
at a local community action group -- not really the kind of thing you
get paid for.
That said, if any of you have time machines/time dilation devices
On 27 apr 2010, at 22:12, Jason Dusek wrote:
So UU parsers can construct input?
The perform an editing action on the input so it becomes a sentence of the
language recognised.
The presence of an
empty list in the 2nd slot of the tuple is the only
indicator of errors?
The parser wants
I think that formatted plain-text output would be much better than XML,
something that is human-readable and relatively easy to parse via
machine. Something similar to the GHC error output would work well
because developers are familiar with it.
Test n:Result
Location
Error message
I think that, rather than having Cabal try to combine the results of
different frameworks, Cabal should specify interfaces that frameworks
need to conform to.
E.g., rather than integrating test-framework into Cabal so that HUnit
works with it, modify HUnit so it emits the format that Cabal
Hi, I have code as below. How come case version works wrong and
gives me overlap compiling warning? Thanks.
if dayOfMonth == firstDayOfMonth
then v day (x, y)
else if dayOfMonth == lastDayOfMonth
then not_ $ v day (x, y)
else Mider day (x, y)
case dayOfMonth of
On 28 April 2010 09:24, Richard G. richa...@richardg.name wrote:
I think that formatted plain-text output would be much better than XML,
something that is human-readable and relatively easy to parse via machine.
Something similar to the GHC error output would work well because
developers are
2010/4/28 Magicloud Magiclouds magicloud.magiclo...@gmail.com:
Hi, I have code as below. How come case version works wrong and
gives me overlap compiling warning? Thanks.
if dayOfMonth == firstDayOfMonth
then v day (x, y)
else if dayOfMonth == lastDayOfMonth
then not_ $ v day (x,
Hi
I do not have an example for you, but I do have some text conversion
functions you may find useful. I have attached the text conversion
functions in a file.
/Mads
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 09:46 +, Johannes Waldmann wrote:
Hi - I'm looking for an example/demo happstack server
that handles
Hi
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 14:55 -0700, Don Stewart wrote:
We could bind to Rts.c in the GHC runtime, and get all the stats
programmatically that you can get with +RTS -s
That would be nice.
/Mads
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Uwe Schmidt u...@fh-wedel.de writes:
The HTML parser in HXT is based on tagsoup. It's a lazy parser
(it does not use parsec) and it tries to parse everything as HTML.
But garbage in, garbage out, there is no approach to repair illegal HTML
as e.g. the Tidy parsers do. The parser uses tagsoup
Joe Fredette jfred...@gmail.com writes:
That said, if any of you have time machines/time dilation devices in
the works, I'm happy to beta test.
Don't be silly, you don't need more time, you need more _you_
(i.e. clones); after all, nothing ever goes wrong with clones! :p
--
Ivan Lazar
2010/4/28 Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com:
Joe Fredette jfred...@gmail.com writes:
That said, if any of you have time machines/time dilation devices in
the works, I'm happy to beta test.
Don't be silly, you don't need more time, you need more _you_
(i.e. clones); after all,
minh thu not...@gmail.com writes:
2010/4/28 Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com:
Joe Fredette jfred...@gmail.com writes:
That said, if any of you have time machines/time dilation devices in
the works, I'm happy to beta test.
Don't be silly, you don't need more time, you need
2010/4/28 Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com:
minh thu not...@gmail.com writes:
2010/4/28 Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com:
Joe Fredette jfred...@gmail.com writes:
That said, if any of you have time machines/time dilation devices in
the works, I'm happy to beta
Ivan Miljenovic schrieb:
So you don't want the labels to be part of the actual datatype? And
for users to then have to deal with any labels they want themselves?
No, you would continue to provide labelled and unlabelled graphs, where
unlabelled graphs (or just Graphs) are the base type and
Henning Thielemann schlepp...@henning-thielemann.de writes:
Ivan Miljenovic schrieb:
So you don't want the labels to be part of the actual datatype? And
for users to then have to deal with any labels they want themselves?
No, you would continue to provide labelled and unlabelled graphs,
Hi Ivan,
Uwe Schmidt u...@fh-wedel.de writes:
The HTML parser in HXT is based on tagsoup. It's a lazy parser
(it does not use parsec) and it tries to parse everything as HTML.
But garbage in, garbage out, there is no approach to repair illegal HTML
as e.g. the Tidy parsers do. The parser
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:30 AM, Richard G. richa...@richardg.name wrote:
I think that, rather than having Cabal try to combine the results of
different frameworks, Cabal should specify interfaces that frameworks need
to conform to.
E.g., rather than integrating test-framework into Cabal so
Hi
From
http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/6.12.1/html/libraries/base-4.2.0.0/Control-Exception.html#3
... The difference between using try and catch for recovery is that in
catch the handler is inside an implicit block (see Asynchronous
Exceptions) which is important when catching asynchronous
I want to save the state of the system to disk, I want to be able to
play the game, pick a point to stop, freeze it and turn off the
computer, and then come back later and resume. Why is that unwise?
What are the alternatives?
B
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Christopher Lane Hinson
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Duncan Coutts
duncan.cou...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 28 April 2010 09:24, Richard G. richa...@richardg.name wrote:
I think that formatted plain-text output would be much better than XML,
something that is human-readable and relatively easy to parse via machine.
Bradford Larsen wrote:
I don't have the book handy (it was from the library), but I seem to
remember reading something along those lines in ``Datatype-Generic
Programming: International Spring School, SSDGP 2006, Nottingham, UK,
April 24-27, 2006, Revised Lectures'', edited by Backhouse,
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Richard G. richa...@richardg.name wrote:
I think that formatted plain-text output would be much better than XML,
something that is human-readable and relatively easy to parse via machine.
Something similar to the GHC error output would work well because
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010, Ben wrote:
I want to save the state of the system to disk, I want to be able to
play the game, pick a point to stop, freeze it and turn off the
computer, and then come back later and resume. Why is that unwise?
What are the alternatives?
B
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Ben
Hello Christin,
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/download_ghc_6_10_4.html#x86solaris
is supposed to work under open solaris, too.
it does actually, quite nicely too, in the *global* zone.
It's just when I try to install it into a separate zone the install fails.
Have you managed to install it
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Duncan Coutts
duncan.cou...@googlemail.com wrote:
Yes, it means the testing agent (cabal-install or some other
program/system) can do more than simply run all the tests. It means it
can enumerate them and not run them (think a GUI or web interface), run
a
Richard G. schrieb:
I think that formatted plain-text output would be much better than XML,
something that is human-readable and relatively easy to parse via
machine. Something similar to the GHC error output would work well
because developers are familiar with it.
Test n:Result
If the goal is continuous integration, perhaps it would be sufficient to
require cabal test to return an error code of 0 if all tests succeed, and
something else if any of them fail; it can additionally print whatever output
it wants in either case. The continuous integration system would
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Rogan Creswick cresw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Duncan Coutts
duncan.cou...@googlemail.com wrote:
Yes, it means the testing agent (cabal-install or some other
program/system) can do more than simply run all the tests. It means it
Interesting topic. I find it a bit annoying that Haskell doesn't
provide support to save functions. I understand this is problematic,
but it would be very nice if the Haskell runtime provided a way to
serialize (part of) the heap, making sure that pointers to compiled
functions get resolved
minh thu schrieb:
2010/4/28 Magicloud Magiclouds magicloud.magiclo...@gmail.com:
Hi, I have code as below. How come case version works wrong and
gives me overlap compiling warning? Thanks.
if dayOfMonth == firstDayOfMonth
then v day (x, y)
else if dayOfMonth == lastDayOfMonth
I agree. This would be an extremely useful feature, not only for game
development, but also for web development. We often use continuations as a way
to add state to the web, but this fails for two reasons: whenever the server
restarts, or when we scale to multiple machines.
However, I think it
Hi,
I have recently updated Hoogle so it points at specific documentation.
If anyone finds any further bugs, please let me know.
I'm hoping to go through Hoogle and revise much of it in the near
future, and intend to put things in place to stop this happening again
(and keep it up to date).
On Apr 28, 2010, at 3:41 PM, Limestraël wrote:
I think the problem with function serialization is that unlike languages
which run over a virtual machine, bytecode generated by GHC is
platform-specific (just as compilated C or C++) and therefore can run
directly on top of the system, which
I like this. One area that would be helpful is the ability to run the
tests when different compile flags are used. E.g., the HUnit tests have
different behaviors when compiled with and without optimization; it
would be very handy if I could automate the testing of both cases.
I don't
The benchmarks game has been updated to use 6.12.2
Please dive in and help tweak/improve/spot any regressions.
Esp. with respect to multicore flags/options/...
- Forwarded message from Isaac Gouy -
Subject: fyi benchmarks game updated to ghc 6.12.2
On 28/04/10 21:05, Don Stewart wrote:
The benchmarks game has been updated to use 6.12.2
Please dive in and help tweak/improve/spot any regressions.
Esp. with respect to multicore flags/options/...
chameneos is using -N5, which is probably killing it.
Cheers,
Simon
On 28/04/10 14:45, Mads Lindstrøm wrote:
Hi
From
http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/6.12.1/html/libraries/base-4.2.0.0/Control-Exception.html#3
... The difference between using try and catch for recovery is that in
catch the handler is inside an implicit block (see Asynchronous
Exceptions) which is
As a side note, it's interesting that C# doesn't allow serialization
of closures (anonymous delegates). The compiler-generated name
assigned to an anonymous delegate can be different after each
re-compilation. This is also really annoying in C#/.NET, since one
must explicitly add a named method if
We are working towards a version of CPSA with the property that
whenever it successfully terminates, every possible execution is
described by its output. However, the current implementation
occasionally fails to find some executions.
That is concerning - is it due to ...
We have formally
I think y'all are talking past each other, a little bit. There are two ways to
serialize a function:
1) Serialize the bytecode for the function.
2) Serialize a persistant reference to a function that resides inside the
executable.
Personally, I think that either strategy is dubious. If you
thanks for the comments, i'll try to respond to them all. but to
start off with, let me mention that my ultimate goal is to have a way
of writing down causal and robust (restartable) computations which
happen on infinite streams of data in a nice way -- by which i mean
the declarative /
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 09:55 -0700, Rogan Creswick wrote:
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Duncan Coutts
duncan.cou...@googlemail.com wrote:
Yes, it means the testing agent (cabal-install or some other
program/system) can do more than simply run all the tests. It means it
can enumerate
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 04:16:08PM -0700, Ben wrote:
so i tried state machines of a sort
newtype STAuto s a b = STAuto { unSTAuto : (a, s) - (b, s) }
where the interruptibility would come from being able to save out the
state s. i was not successful, unfortunately, in this level of
Ben,
On 29/04/2010, at 6:16 AM, Ben wrote:
[...]
newtype STAuto s a b = STAuto { unSTAuto : (a, s) - (b, s) }
As Felipe observes in detail, this can be made to work. He uses Read and Show
for serialisation, but clearly you can use whatever you like instead.
I just wanted to add that one
46 matches
Mail list logo
