AFAIK there is no way to do that, thouhg scion[1] may offer it.
Personally I develop more complex local functions at the top-level,
and once I'm happy with it I perform some re-factoring and move it in.
/M
[1]: https://github.com/nominolo/scion/blob/master/README.markdown
--
Magnus Therning
Hello,
I'm writing a small Haskell library for functional reactive programming.
The core of the library consists of two data types and several
primitives. However, I have programmed this core *twice*: once as a
*model* that displays the intended semantics, and once as the actual
Dear Cafe,
Can someone please help me with getting the value of the table cell with HXT
in the following html:
table class=tblc
tr
td class=tdcx/td
tdy/td
/tr
tr
td class=tdca/td
tdb/td
/tr
/table
I need the value of the second cell in a row that has first cell with some
predefined
ncurses is proving too difficult to setup, so I'm working on a new library
called charm. The C code works by itself, but I can't compile a Haskell
wrapper for it. While the tutorials at
HaskellWikihttp://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/FFI_complete_examplesare
helpful, they're outdated. Argh! The
Hi!
Is there for $ (fmap) operator some nice looking symbol in mathematics, LaTeX?
I am looking here:
http://www.soi.city.ac.uk/~ross/papers/Applicative.html
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/6.12.1/html/libraries/base/Control-Applicative.html
but only for other operators there are nice symbols,
On Friday 08 April 2011 14:05:46, Mitar wrote:
I have also tried \mathbin{\$} but it adds space around $ (at least
in lhs2tex), so it looks ugly.
Would \mathbin{\langle\$\rangle} look better?
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
Mitar schrieb:
Hi!
Is there for $ (fmap) operator some nice looking symbol in mathematics,
LaTeX?
I am looking here:
http://www.soi.city.ac.uk/~ross/papers/Applicative.html
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/6.12.1/html/libraries/base/Control-Applicative.html
but only for other
Magnus Therning schrieb:
AFAIK there is no way to do that, thouhg scion[1] may offer it.
Personally I develop more complex local functions at the top-level,
and once I'm happy with it I perform some re-factoring and move it in.
I would not write large local functions at all. I would leave
Hi!
Uuu, nice. Thanks Daniel and Henning.
Mitar
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 5:24 AM, Henning Thielemann
schlepp...@henning-thielemann.de wrote:
Magnus Therning schrieb:
AFAIK there is no way to do that, thouhg scion[1] may offer it.
Personally I develop more complex local functions at the top-level,
and once I'm happy with it I perform some
On 08/04/11 11:54, Heinrich Apfelmus wrote:
Hello,
I'm writing a small Haskell library for functional reactive programming.
The core of the library consists of two data types and several
primitives. However, I have programmed this core *twice*: once as a
*model* that displays the intended
On Friday 08 April 2011 14:25:41, Mitar wrote:
Hi!
Uuu, nice. Thanks Daniel and Henning.
Alternatively, you can kill off the spaces '' and '' produce using
\mspace,
\newcommand{\ltgt}[1]{\mathbin{\mspace{-6mu}#1\mspace{-6mu}}}
\newcommand{\fmap}{\ltgt{\$}}
The value used in \mspace can
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 13:24, Henning Thielemann
schlepp...@henning-thielemann.de wrote:
Magnus Therning schrieb:
AFAIK there is no way to do that, thouhg scion[1] may offer it.
Personally I develop more complex local functions at the top-level,
and once I'm happy with it I perform some
Currently what I do is declare a signature for helper, and then if it
gets a type error try to figure out how to fix it. It's usually not
very hard, but it would be slick to have the signature filled in
automatically.
Try ghc-mod on Hackage if you are an Emacs user.
If GHC can guess the
I made a mistake. Use M-t instead of C-cC-t.
Currently what I do is declare a signature for helper, and then if it
gets a type error try to figure out how to fix it. It's usually not
very hard, but it would be slick to have the signature filled in
automatically.
Try ghc-mod on Hackage if
Agda's concept of holes seems perfect for this. Does Haskell have
anything similar?
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Kazu Yamamoto k...@iij.ad.jp wrote:
I made a mistake. Use M-t instead of C-cC-t.
Currently what I do is declare a signature for helper, and then if it
gets a type error try to
I'm trying out GHC-7.0.3-x86_64 for Mac OS X and see what seems to be a bug in
System.Time.diffClockTimes. The TimeDiff tdPicosec field returns values that
seem to jump around erratically:
test = do
startTime - System.Time.getClockTime
endTime - System.Time.getClockTime
let dt =
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 19:04 +0200, Ertugrul Soeylemez wrote:
Hello fellow Haskellers,
I'm trying to solve a very practical problem: I need a stateful
iteratee monad transformer. Explicit state passing is very inconvenient
and would destroy the elegance of my library.
There are two
On 8 April 2011 22:48, Warren Harris warrensomeb...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying out GHC-7.0.3-x86_64 for Mac OS X and see what seems to be a bug
in System.Time.diffClockTimes. The TimeDiff tdPicosec field returns values
that seem to jump around erratically
Strange. This doesn't happen on my
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Warren Harris warrensomeb...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying out GHC-7.0.3-x86_64 for Mac OS X and see what seems to be a bug
in System.Time.diffClockTimes. The TimeDiff tdPicosec field returns values
that seem to jump around erratically:
test = do
startTime -
On 4/8/11 8:55 AM, Twan van Laarhoven wrote:
-- this class is useful beyond this FRP library,
-- you might already be able to find it on hackage somewhere
class Functor f = Filterable f where
filter :: (a - Bool) - f a - f a
-- filter p . fmap f == fmap f . filter (p . f)
-- filter (const True)
On 4/8/11 8:24 AM, Henning Thielemann wrote:
Magnus Therning schrieb:
AFAIK there is no way to do that, thouhg scion[1] may offer it.
Personally I develop more complex local functions at the top-level,
and once I'm happy with it I perform some re-factoring and move it in.
I would not write
Hi,
After a few weeks of hard work I have managed to add the CTR, CMAC and
SIV modes of operation. The implemententation passes all the KATS I
could find and is made as efficiently as possible without forgetting the
risk of timing attacks over them. The patch is attached here and you can
free it
I would not write large local functions at all. I would leave them
top-level but do not export them. This also allows to test them from GHCi.
The downside to this is when you want to use the worker/wrapper transform in
order to capture some local variables for a recursive function, instead of
24 matches
Mail list logo
