On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 08:18:04PM -0800, John Meacham wrote:
People tend to concentrate on the lambda which cooresponds to the
functional aspect of haskell when designing logos. Not nearly enough
attention is paid to the other striking feature, the laziness.
If we want to emphasize the
From the code, I think it is what I want. But still, I need some time
to understand it
Anyway, thank you.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:02 PM, o...@okmij.org wrote:
Multi-parameter type classes are more flexible. Here is how you can
write your old code:
{-# LANGUAGE MultiParamTypeClasses,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:28:47AM +0100, Alexander Bernauer wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 08:18:04PM -0800, John Meacham wrote:
People tend to concentrate on the lambda which cooresponds to the
functional aspect of haskell when designing logos. Not nearly enough
attention is paid to the
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Roman Cheplyaka r...@ro-che.info wrote:
Hi Cafe,
Does anyone currently work on Test.SmallCheck?
I recall this being an unfortunate problem from the first release. As
I recall the author was interested in getting the concept out there
but had no motivation (or
On 16/11/2011 04:50 AM, heathmatlock wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:18 PM, John Meacham j...@repetae.net
mailto:j...@repetae.net wrote:
People tend to concentrate on the lambda which cooresponds to the
functional aspect of haskell when designing logos. Not nearly enough
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Andrew Coppin andrewcop...@btinternet.com
wrote:
On 16/11/2011 04:50 AM, heathmatlock wrote:
If you're going to draw a piece of graphics, why use ASCII workarounds
like _|_, when you can use the real thing (i.e., ⊥)?
Noted, will change.
Are we going to
2011/11/16 Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Jason Dusek jason.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Tried a modifySTRef' defined this way:
modifySTRef' ref f = do
val - (f $!!) $ readSTRef ref
writeSTRef ref (val `seq` val)
...but
Hi all,
I spent some time today documenting a library and the experience left me
wanting a better markup language. In particular, Haddock lacks:
* markup for bold text: bold text works better than italics for emphasis
on computer monitors.
* hyperlinks with anchor texts: having the actual URL
2011/11/16 Tristan Ravitch travi...@cs.wisc.edu:
Have you tried building the vector using things besides
write/ST? It might be a bit faster to use something like
Vector.unfoldr or Vector.generateM and ByteString.index to
build up a pure Vector. After that you could use
Vector.unsafeThaw to
Hi all,
Data.Map is getting split into Data.Map.Lazy and Data.Map.Strict (with
Data.Map re-exporting the lazy API). I want to better document the
strictness properties of the two new modules. Right now the
documentation for Data.Map.Strict reads:
Strictness properties
=
*
On 18 November 2011 16:09, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I spent some time today documenting a library and the experience left me
wanting a better markup language. In particular, Haddock lacks:
* markup for bold text: bold text works better than italics for emphasis on
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not entirely happy with this formulation. I'm looking for
something that's clear (i.e. precise and concise, without leaving out
important information), assuming that the reader already knows how
lazy evaluation
On 18 November 2011 16:44, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not entirely happy with this formulation. I'm looking for
something that's clear (i.e. precise and concise, without leaving out
important
Any ideas for further improvements?
I feel like there should be a canonical what is WHNF page on
haskell.org that docs like this can link to. Namely, what it is
theoretically, what that means for various examples of thunks (i.e.
show how a sample graph would get reduced), and what that means
Last time to upload images for a long time, the break is here and I have
work to do! I got a bit tired of explaining that it's a lamb, and not
something similar to a rat, so I made the face less abstract. My little
niece liked it better than the old one for some reason. Here's some images
I threw
On 18 November 2011 18:16, Magicloud Magiclouds
magicloud.magiclo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
For example: data A = B { c :: Int }. Then I must use it this way
(B 0) { c = 1 }. Anyway I could make it like (B 0) { d = 1 }?
No, but you *can* write a function of type `B - Int - B' to do it for you.
16 matches
Mail list logo
