JHC itself is based upon Boquist's GRIN language described in his PhD
thesis: Code Optimization Techniques for Lazy Functional Languages
http://mirror.seize.it/papers/Code%20Optimization%20Techniques%20for%20Lazy%20Functional%20Languages.pdf
On 13 January 2012 01:50, Jason Dagit dag...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Serge D. Mechveliani mech...@botik.ru wrote:
People,
(I wonder: is this for beginn...@haskell.org ?)
I don't think so.
I need to organize a string interface for a Haskell function
Main.axiom and a C program
fifoFromA.c
via
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 04:34:37PM +0100, Chadda?? Fouch?? wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Serge D. Mechveliani mech...@botik.ru
wrote:
People,
(I wonder: is this for beginn...@haskell.org ?)
I don't think so.
I need to organize a string interface for a Haskell
Hello,
I'd like to announce the first release of JuicyPixels, an image loading library
written entirely in Haskell. The focus of this library is ease of use and
correct loading. In this first version the library is capable of the following
actions :
- PNG(.png)
* Reading
-
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:25, Serge D. Mechveliani mech...@botik.ruwrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 04:34:37PM +0100, Chadda?? Fouch?? wrote:
Now that seems interesting, but just to be clear : did you choose
this solution (and why won't you use the FFI instead) or is this just
to see how
Hi,
My question is regarding the correct us of STM in Haskell. I have put
to together a simple example, which represents more verbose code in a
library that I am writing.
The question is a simple one. Must all operations on a TVar happen
within *the same* atomically block, or am I am I
Quoth Serge D. Mechveliani mech...@botik.ru,
[ ... why in Haskell instead of FFI ... ]
Because it is a direct and the simplest approach. Why does one need a
foreign language, if all the needed functions are in the standard
Haskell library?
The GHC Haskell library makes some compromises with
Brandon, can you elaborate? Are you talking about UNIX named pipes or
FIFO/queue data structures in general?
Mike Craig
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Brandon Allbery allber...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:25, Serge D. Mechveliani mech...@botik.ruwrote:
On Fri, Jan 13,
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Rob Stewart
robstewar...@googlemail.comwrote:
The question is a simple one. Must all operations on a TVar happen
within *the same* atomically block, or am I am I guaranteed thread
safety if, say, I have a number of atomically blocks in an IO
function.
If
I thank people for the notes.
People write that the example without unsafePerformIO is desirable.
So I present the improved question and improved, pure code.
--
I need to organize a string interface for a Haskell function
Aha, thanks both.
The haskell organisation looks bigger, I think I'd like to upload feed there. Could the owner add contact info or a
how-to-join note to the page ?
-Simon
On 1/10/12 12:22 PM, David Terei wrote:
There is also:
https://github.com/haskell
where a bunch of us are hosting
I (Sergei) am invesigating (so far) only Unix named pipes.
I hope you are aware of the many gotchas involved with FIFOs.
There are very good reasons why they are not widely used.
At least in C - C, the Unix named pipes do work.
And I am trying to replace the first end with Haskell.
On
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:08:04AM -0800, Donn Cave wrote:
Quoth Serge D. Mechveliani mech...@botik.ru,
[ ... why in Haskell instead of FFI ... ]
Because it is a direct and the simplest approach. Why does one need a
foreign language, if all the needed functions are in the standard
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 13:23, Michael Craig mks...@gmail.com wrote:
Brandon, can you elaborate? Are you talking about UNIX named pipes or
FIFO/queue data structures in general?
I mean POSIX named pipes. They work, but they don't do what most people
think they do, and they're rather annoying
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 04:34:37PM +0100, Chadda?? Fouch?? wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Serge D. Mechveliani mech...@botik.ru
wrote:
[..]
I need to organize a string interface for a Haskell function
Main.axiom and a C program
fifoFromA.c
via
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Simon Michael si...@joyful.com wrote:
Aha, thanks both.
The haskell organisation looks bigger, I think I'd like to upload feed
there. Could the owner add contact info or a how-to-join note to the page ?
The Haskell organization on GitHub is for core libraries
Quoth Serge D. Mechveliani mech...@botik.ru,
...
Initially, I did the example by the Foreign Function Interface for C.
But then, I thought But this is unnatural! Use plainly the standard
Haskell IO, it has everything.
So, your advice is return to FFI ?
Well, it turns out that the I/O system
Thanks for this upload! I searched something like this a time ago. I'll
test it soon and, if I have any issue, send you some feedback. Thanks again
for the work. I made a library to work with PPM images (not released to
Hackage), but I'm glad to see a Haskell implementation of PNG and JPG.
Good
I'm not happy with asynchronous I/O in Haskell. It's hard to reason
about, and doesn't compose well. At least in my code.
I'm currently trying to build a networking layer for my application
using Network.TLS. Here is a rather minimalist API:
newtype Connection = Connection (TLSCtx Handle)
On 01/14/2012 06:24 AM, Joey Adams wrote:
I'm not happy with asynchronous I/O in Haskell. It's hard to reason
about, and doesn't compose well. At least in my code.
[--snip--]
Async I/O *is* tricky if you're expecting threads to do their own
writes/reads directly to/from sockets. I find
20 matches
Mail list logo
